i thought the movie was HORRIBLE! i really don't like movies with Nicholas Cage. they usually turn out bad. sure he got an academy award for best award (way back in 1995) but none of his more recent (post 2000) movies have been any good...

swat

Australia142 Posts

August 05 2009 07:41 GMT

#22

yeah I wasn't a fan of the movie, only decent thing in it was Beethoven's 7th symphony, but even then it wasn't a good mix with this movie.

food

United States1951 Posts

August 05 2009 07:43 GMT

#23

no doubt

Perguvious

United States1783 Posts

August 05 2009 07:56 GMT

#24

airplanes fall and trains flip and cage tries to act epic in those scenes and then he finds out everyone's gonna die and basically goes "meh" and then everyone dies <- my idea of the movie

Pholon

Netherlands6142 Posts

August 05 2009 08:55 GMT

#25

On August 05 2009 13:42 Sky wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

The determinism really bothered me. If they could predict everything (including the major disaster in the end) what would be the point of putting humans on Earth (if the humans are only going to last a short span of time relative to planet).

EDIT: The angel/alien vagueness was a cop-out.

Em yes, this question is actually the whole point of the movie.

Roxen000

1226 Posts

August 05 2009 09:22 GMT

#26

The movie was trash.

BUT. The scene where the plane crashes looked fucking awesome in the theater and was nice and loud. Really cool sequence.

Carnivorous Sheep

Baa?21245 Posts

August 05 2009 09:45 GMT

#27

On August 05 2009 16:41 swat wrote:
yeah I wasn't a fan of the movie, only decent thing in it was Beethoven's 7th symphony, but even then it wasn't a good mix with this movie.

My thoughts exactly.

What a crappy ending lol, makes no sense.

foeffa

Belgium2115 Posts

August 05 2009 12:42 GMT

#28

I was expecting the troll end to completely destroy my good impression of the rest of the movie, so I was not that disappointed. If I had expected the movie to stay consistently strong, I would 've felt ripped off for sure.

disciple

9071 Posts

August 05 2009 13:49 GMT

#29

just because of the epic CGI scenes I would give this movie 2/10. All in all I would prefer having a syphilis than watching this movie again. Its the absolute peak of the inability of the Hollywood writers and directors,in the past 3 years, to come up with interesting and original story.

cujo2k

Canada1044 Posts

August 05 2009 14:01 GMT

#30

I wasn't a huge fan of the ending, but I liked the movie overall.. Certainly better than most out there imo.

EpiK

Korea (South)5757 Posts

August 05 2009 15:10 GMT

#31

Rose Byrne is so cute

p4ge

Canada160 Posts

August 06 2009 06:53 GMT

#32

for some reason i really enjoyed this movie, but the ending was really nostalgic for me so i dunno, definitely one of those weird ones

rapture

Germany645 Posts

August 06 2009 09:45 GMT

#33

nicholas cage possibly the worst actor of all time.. and the rest of the movie was at most average

nibbles

United Kingdom179 Posts

August 06 2009 09:54 GMT

#34

this is one of the last films i saw in cinema, and i have to say it was distinctly average. tbh, i haven't seen any particularly good films since like The Dark Knight, i don't know why they're so hard to come by.