How the fuck is that shit fair? T_T

For the low cost of fucking 100min near the beginning they can instantly cost a zerg the game if he fucks up even once. A scrub who knows the timing with an APM of 80APM can properly execute a fucking bunker rush...

While set back only 100 FUCKING MINERALS, zerg has to pull drones, get extra lings instead of drones, and micro the drones properly and constantly to kill the fucking marines...

UGH. I just lost to one on iccup and I'm soooo fucking pissed...T_T

kk /rant.

writer22816

United States5775 Posts

February 21 2009 12:58 GMT

Blogs like this that rant, and aren't about TvP, are fundamentally flawed

LosingID8

CA10829 Posts

February 21 2009 13:00 GMT

mmm generally it requires an 8rax which really hurts your econ.

plus it keeps zergs honest from going 12hatch at nat all the time. 12hatch isn't a given, it's also a slight risk. if you were to 9pool you should be able to defend it np.

Nytefish

United Kingdom4282 Posts

February 21 2009 13:58 GMT

Pretty arrogant to believe you deserve an extra base for free, no? ^^

Chill

Calgary25993 Posts

February 21 2009 14:05 GMT

Hi, I'm going to talk about racial balance when I have no understanding of StarCraft.

I understand you're upset, but this kind of comment sets me on tilt. Learn to defend it or learn to play safer.

besiger

Croatia2452 Posts

February 21 2009 14:11 GMT

get over it, its the terrans 4 pool.

HeavOnEarth

United States7087 Posts

February 21 2009 14:21 GMT

just run past the bunker with some lings and drones and ggnore
under 80apm< as well. then make some lings to defend home and its over GG
vs proxy anyways

meegrean

Thailand7699 Posts

February 21 2009 14:22 GMT

It's to counter 12 hatch.

DoX.)

Singapore6164 Posts

February 21 2009 14:31 GMT

On February 21 2009 23:11 besiger wrote:
get over it, its the terrans 4 pool.

KrAzYfoOL

Australia3037 Posts

February 21 2009 14:50 GMT

#10

On February 21 2009 22:58 Nytefish wrote:
Pretty arrogant to believe you deserve an extra base for free, no? ^^

how is 350 minerals free?

s.a.y

Croatia3840 Posts

February 21 2009 14:51 GMT

#11

next time do a 12 pool, not 12 hatch

Hyperionnn

Turkey4968 Posts

February 21 2009 14:51 GMT

#12

go 9 pool with our without gas and dont cry if you can not defend a bunker rush with 12 hatch.

DreaM)XeRO

Korea (South)4667 Posts

February 21 2009 14:53 GMT

#13

On February 21 2009 23:05 Chill wrote:
Hi, I'm going to talk about racial balance when I have no understanding of StarCraft.

I understand you're upset, but this kind of comment sets me on tilt. Learn to defend it or learn to play safer.

oh man..what happened chill?
i remember when you used to flame posts like this

...gone are the days of old

Cloud

Sexico5880 Posts

February 21 2009 14:58 GMT

#14

For the cost of like 8 less mined minerals, an earlier scout can send all that to hell.

Total imbalance.

FreeDoM[YA]

Canada855 Posts

February 21 2009 15:18 GMT

#15

I like being bunker rushed as zerg because it's fun. It's not too hard to counter and it's a breath of fresh air to go into an early game micro fest.

They aren't hard to stop and you can easily get back into the game , or counter by constantly making lings and raid into them.

Nyovne

Netherlands19138 Posts

February 21 2009 15:44 GMT

#16

*TILT*

jello_biafra

United Kingdom6641 Posts

February 21 2009 16:54 GMT

#17

It sets the terran back more than 100 minerals...first they have to rax before depot, send a number of SCVs out when numbers are already low and it delays their expo/tech.