omg i came across a bulbasaur early in the game and tried to catch it and failed even got it down to lowest red zone hp.... have any of you found the pokemon (hacked ones) are harder to catch?
just my 2 cents

IdrA

United States11541 Posts

July 15 2008 12:21 GMT

#29

what perfect timing
we have like a week off and most of the other guys went home so ive been bored
is the game beatable in like 5 days?

you play it on a gameboy emulator imthemaster, you can find one in his other pokemon thread.

Xiberia

Sweden634 Posts

July 15 2008 12:36 GMT

#30

On July 15 2008 21:21 IdrA wrote:
what perfect timing
we have like a week off and most of the other guys went home so ive been bored
is the game beatable in like 5 days?

you play it on a gameboy emulator imthemaster, you can find one in his other pokemon thread.

I hope you're prepared to go all the way. Starcraft progaming is nothing compared to Pokemon.

IdrA

United States11541 Posts

July 15 2008 12:38 GMT

#31

no theyre really quite similar.

stim[mic]

Australia93 Posts

July 15 2008 12:43 GMT

#32

so wat pokemon are you then idra>?

IdrA

United States11541 Posts

July 15 2008 12:45 GMT

#33

the grass one, the other 2 are old arent they? i thought they always had 3 new ones as the starters

Ilikestarcraft

Korea (South)17730 Posts

July 15 2008 13:07 GMT

#34

rofl its funny imagining idra playing pokemon

Scaramanga

Australia8090 Posts

July 15 2008 13:15 GMT

#35

Idra what apm you got playing pokemon lol, nah i dont see anyone beating this in 5 days, its all hacked so like the second gym has pokemon that are super effective against you and are level 1000000000000000000

JohnColtrane

Australia4813 Posts

July 15 2008 13:33 GMT

#36

ive got emerald on GBA, but the only one ive played on emulator was fire red, very nostalgic. im happy that the cloning glitch is still around, i dont have another gen 3 pokemon game / a friend to play with, so i can clone TMs for all my pokemon.

just a question, does anyone think that the new generation games (diamond, pearl etc) are worth buying along with a nintendo DS? ive read that its a step up from gen 3 in a similar fashion that gen 2 was to gen 1.

evan, is it possible to get pokemon that evolve via trade (haunter -> gengar, seadra -> kingdra) on emulator?

Demoninja

United States1190 Posts

July 15 2008 13:46 GMT

#37

Sorry but in Emerald 386 you can't catch Mantine or w/e

JohnColtrane

Australia4813 Posts

July 15 2008 13:54 GMT

#38

that sucks, any other additions to the the game?

nosepass has got to be the most horrible pokemon ever to be concieved, and its evolution looks like mario, it has the same black moustache and red hat

dinmsab

Malaysia2246 Posts

July 15 2008 13:55 GMT

#39

On July 15 2008 20:27 Umbrella wrote:
Does anyone even play competitive pokemon here?

I feel alone lol

lol @ competetive pokemon. LiquidPokermon.net anyone?

Scaramanga

Australia8090 Posts

July 15 2008 14:02 GMT

#40

On July 15 2008 22:33 JohnColtrane wrote:
ive got emerald on GBA, but the only one ive played on emulator was fire red, very nostalgic. im happy that the cloning glitch is still around, i dont have another gen 3 pokemon game / a friend to play with, so i can clone TMs for all my pokemon.

just a question, does anyone think that the new generation games (diamond, pearl etc) are worth buying along with a nintendo DS? ive read that its a step up from gen 3 in a similar fashion that gen 2 was to gen 1.

evan, is it possible to get pokemon that evolve via trade (haunter -> gengar, seadra -> kingdra) on emulator?

No, its SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO slow, thats why i play the emulators because of the speedy button, theres alot of good games on ds though if your wondering