EPTWhy you shouldn't qq about girls - Page 3
| Blogs > Shady Sands |
|
HardlyNever
United States1258 Posts
| ||
|
EffervescentAureola
United States410 Posts
 | ||
|
OpticalShot
Canada6330 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32051 Posts
| ||
|
jumbotroN
Peru229 Posts
| ||
|
Mordanis
United States893 Posts
On October 09 2012 18:24 Ghin wrote: I agree with your sentiment but not with your facts. The reasons governing female attraction extend far beyond a mere two axis chart. I completely agree. This should be plotted as the contour lines of a 3 dimensional curve s=f(r,m)+ Show Spoiler + Sex is an increasing function of respectability and money  | ||
|
T.O.P.
Hong Kong4685 Posts
On October 10 2012 04:13 QuanticHawk wrote: where does internet superstar rank so i know how to properly gauge myself amongst my peers It's where the 2 axis intersect. | ||
|
Ryalnos
United States1946 Posts
Solid. | ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
wp | ||
|
AnachronisticAnarchy
United States2957 Posts
On October 09 2012 22:38 Alpino wrote: Sexist crap all over this blog and its answers True crap all over this blog and its answers. I have a prime example for you, too. My uncle is a genius and a lawyer, and in college he was a cheerleader. He got to hang with the football team a good bit, was good friends with a few of them, if I recall correctly. And one thing about them really impressed him: at any time, any place, any one of them could yank their expensive smartphone out of their pockets and have a hot fuck lined right up for them in seconds. Many of them did indeed do this, it wasn't just them bragging to him. That graph speaks the unpleasant truth, friend. Women are suckers for people with certain jobs. | ||
|
jpak
United States5045 Posts
On October 10 2012 03:07 Kalingingsong wrote: question btw: what if the "high official in China" is actually a woman? who would they sleep with? even higher male officials? That's not out of the question. On the other hand, sex with her butler is also not out of the question. | ||
|
Kalingingsong
Canada633 Posts
men's weakness = sex women's weakness = power+money so as men we should flip the table by Faking power+money. Get their sex, then escape like a biotch. specific plan: 1) get a bunch of guys together, pool their cash to buy a really fancy car (or a fancy suit etc) 2) get 1 guy to drive it out and pretend to be rich (don't tell people you only paid for 1% of it) 3) take people back to the hotel, promise them wealth and riches 4) bang them then escape 5) next day ==> give car to next person in the group <== repeat for 2nd guy and so on 6) after a short while ==> sell car and get new one (so people don't start recognizing it) <== repeat | ||
|
jpak
United States5045 Posts
On October 10 2012 06:00 Kalingingsong wrote: my lords I have a brilliant plan: men's weakness = sex women's weakness = power+money so as men we should flip the table by Faking power+money. Get their sex, then escape like a biotch. And it's easier than you think, as you see here: Just have a couple of your friends act as bodyguards and paparazzi, and those women will be on you like glue. | ||
|
snively
United States1159 Posts
On October 10 2012 04:13 QuanticHawk wrote: where does internet superstar rank so i know how to properly gauge myself amongst my peers LOL is that even a thing | ||
NeverGG
United Kingdom5399 Posts
On October 09 2012 19:10 Shady Sands wrote: no, it's not intentional ofc diff girls respond to diff incentives the poorer the girl, the more likely she wants money the richer the girl, the more likely she wants respectability if she has everything she could ever want... good luck (you'll need it) but honestly, finding women is just about filling a need, that's it. you gotta think of yourself as a provider... but not only that, as a provider who has the choice and not the obligation to provide--someone who isn't emotionally bound to be there but can provide huge amounts of stuff when he is. that's how to snag them Nice sweeping generalizations about my gender there. I'm not a rich woman, but I'm also not looking for a guy (or anyone else) to provide me with money. I believe in working for your own money, and not mooching off of other people/your partner. If other people want to buy you things then that's their choice, but if someone (especially a guy) buys me something then I always make sure to repay him by doing the same (for example buying meals etc.) Not sure how that fits into this little scheme of yours. Also this whole sentence ' finding women is just about filling a need, that's it' is somehow all kinds of creepy to me. | ||
|
Kukaracha
France1954 Posts
On October 10 2012 05:53 AnachronisticAnarchy wrote: True crap all over this blog and its answers. I have a prime example for you, too. My uncle is a genius and a lawyer, and in college he was a cheerleader. He got to hang with the football team a good bit, was good friends with a few of them, if I recall correctly. And one thing about them really impressed him: at any time, any place, any one of them could yank their expensive smartphone out of their pockets and have a hot fuck lined right up for them in seconds. Many of them did indeed do this, it wasn't just them bragging to him. That graph speaks the unpleasant truth, friend. Women are suckers for people with certain jobs. But... smartphones are pretty new. Your uncle must be quite young. Anyway, it's still a matter of confidence, stability and perspectives. It's simply harder to be poor and interesting, because it requires you to step out of the usual bounds; it's not suprising that most attractive poor people are artists. Many women simply tend to have a more abstract relation to attractiveness, which is why a man can seem attractive because of his situation, acts or way of life. On the other hand, men have a very concrete point of view mostly based on looks. Is she hot? No? Then no way. All in all I prefer the feminine version, that focuses more on what people do while men focus on what people are (big boobs, nice butt, cute face). | ||
|
DerNebel
Denmark648 Posts
On October 10 2012 05:53 AnachronisticAnarchy wrote: True crap all over this blog and its answers. I have a prime example for you, too. My uncle is a genius and a lawyer, and in college he was a cheerleader. He got to hang with the football team a good bit, was good friends with a few of them, if I recall correctly. And one thing about them really impressed him: at any time, any place, any one of them could yank their expensive smartphone out of their pockets and have a hot fuck lined right up for them in seconds. Many of them did indeed do this, it wasn't just them bragging to him. That graph speaks the unpleasant truth, friend. Women are suckers for people with certain jobs. I counter your anecdotal evidence with my own anecdotal evidence! I know a guy who gets lots and lots of sex and does programming all day! How useful! "Women are suckers for people with certain jobs." I'm just going to put that sentence there, to be read again. Some men become hair stylists, some women become construction workers, and with all the different, wonderful personalities in this world that is so big neither you nor I can actually comprehend it, you believe you can create a maxim as narrowminded as that and expect it to hold true? You are ridiculous. Also, I have never seen the famous "Girl went home with the richer guy" scenario. I have seen the "Girl went home with the more outgoing and forward guy" and of course the "Girl went home with the more attractive guy" scenario. But then again, women aren't just fish lying on the beach, helpless until a guy picks her up, they take the initiative as well. Sometimes it's "Guy went home with the girl who didn't give a shit about stereotypes and hit on him shamelessly". So, I guess the world is complicated after all. Happy days! | ||
|
Spiffeh
United States830 Posts
here's a tip: get outside and talk to girls. then - maybe - your theories will have a basis. | ||
|
Sajiki
Germany522 Posts
| ||
|
kollin
United Kingdom8380 Posts
On October 10 2012 06:47 Sajiki wrote: why is this featured..? Blogs are featured based on the average rating of a users blog I believe, though I could be wrong. | ||
| ||
