EPT
I'm like you...
| Blogs > Barrin |
|
Randomaccount#77123
United States5003 Posts
| ||
|
South
80 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25561 Posts
| ||
|
Dispersion
Korea (South)504 Posts
On December 03 2011 03:24 South wrote: Maybe because it seems like you're taking yourself too seriously. This post, for example. QFT, the only people I'd be careful about arguing with are IdrA and iNcoNtroL, because one could metaphorically tear my heart out through my eyes, and the other physically could. This is a public Internet forum, true posters say whatever the fuck they want. | ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
Barrin Plexa Be very afraid of: Mani Naz Got it! No seriously I've had similar thoughts as you after what if you were on staff? questions. I would have to curtail the blunt posts I make. Obviously not everyone takes that stance or at least has their own definition of toned down but it's something that's always nagged me. If I were you, could I post the same way I did before? The answer is probably not. On the other side of the quote in your post there is the idea that people are less likely to argue with a hammer. Yes and no. I can't deny some people would meekly excuse themselves if they found themselves on the opposite side of your argument but for the most part I'd like to believe that the only measure of respect given is the quality in the argument. A person is a lot less likely to make a redundant, half assed and venomous post towards someone on staff than they are another user. Or maybe I'm completely wrong on that one- I'm sure more than one banling would disagree but I still feel like it's easier in general to argue without grounds against a regular user over a banling. Oh yeah this was my conclusion. Slipped my mind cos I'm staring at skyrim and the NASL timer. TL Staff weren't drawn out of a hat. In a long discussion thread I'll skip over posts arguing with each other with some frequency because I naturally assume it's grounded closer to personal attacks than meritorious debate. That's my own bias. I read what staff right because they weren't accidentally selected as part of staff. If they were idiots I would know about it already or they wouldn't be on staff. So all and all, it's less based on fear for me and more based on an assumption that if you didn't know what the hell you were talking about then you probably wouldn't be adamant about your viewpoint. | ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES51100 Posts
| ||
|
altered
Switzerland646 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25561 Posts
On December 03 2011 03:31 BLinD-RawR wrote: So your hammer is not for novelty purposes? Trivia fact: When Barrin bans you he literally shows up at your house and hits you with a hammer. Things like this are why users like Ti-XX keep on trying to make accounts-- repetitive blows to the head. | ||
|
Kindream
Estonia66 Posts
| ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
| ||
|
FourFace
701 Posts
| ||
|
Crisium
United States1618 Posts
| ||
Ares[Effort]
DEMACIA6550 Posts
| ||
|
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES51100 Posts
On December 03 2011 03:37 Crisium wrote: So if I respond to this blog with a meme image you won't warn me? Don't push it bro, he's still gotta enforce the general rules | ||
|
Crisium
United States1618 Posts
 This is like many things in life, such as promotions above your once peers as well. If you watch the new season of Dexter (I'll try not to spoil specifically) a character gets promoted to Lieutenant of the cops and finds out it is harder to have just everyday lunch break talks with those who were once of equal rank. Authority/power does that, I guess. | ||
|
chingchong99
Nauru64 Posts
User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
Gamegene
United States8308 Posts
O N E O F U S ! O N E O F U S ! O N E O F U S ! | ||
|
surfinbird1
Germany999 Posts
| ||
|
HwangjaeTerran
Finland5967 Posts
| ||
|
DusTerr
2520 Posts
 | ||
| ||
