|
On October 18 2011 06:42 Kaal wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2011 06:39 Gao Xi wrote:On October 18 2011 06:34 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:33 Kaal wrote:
Actually if you poison the fish in order to poison the predators it's a violation of law, and you'd definitely be prosecuted for it. I've heard of cases like that all the time.
Your best bet is to somehow frame one of your neighbors, perhaps putting a heat-guided crossbow on their roof in order to shoot the birds so that you don't get the blame. Well the thing is, how would he get caught? Would the police know to investigate his fish pond when hawks start showing up dead? He could also poison the fish in other areas as well, to cover his trail. He wouldn't get caught, cause when someone sees the dead hawk, they probably think it died from natural causes. Well I mean whatever doesn't kill the fish, and kills the hawk, might kill other things. So you might see some kind of complete ecological meltdown. Or some environmentalist/scientist might dissect the hawk and find that it died from unnatural causes, and if it was a protected species there would be an investigation, they could find what it last ate, and it would lead back to blasty.
Which is why I said he should not only poison his own pond, but ponds all around the area, so they couldn't single his out. That way, he covers his tracks.
|
On October 18 2011 06:38 Kupon3ss wrote:
Just ask the housekeeper to go to the zhugeliang temple and ask for guidance in front of his statue
I'll do my best to summon the East Winds
|
On October 18 2011 06:44 Sentenal wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2011 06:42 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:39 Gao Xi wrote:On October 18 2011 06:34 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:33 Kaal wrote:
Actually if you poison the fish in order to poison the predators it's a violation of law, and you'd definitely be prosecuted for it. I've heard of cases like that all the time.
Your best bet is to somehow frame one of your neighbors, perhaps putting a heat-guided crossbow on their roof in order to shoot the birds so that you don't get the blame. Well the thing is, how would he get caught? Would the police know to investigate his fish pond when hawks start showing up dead? He could also poison the fish in other areas as well, to cover his trail. He wouldn't get caught, cause when someone sees the dead hawk, they probably think it died from natural causes. Well I mean whatever doesn't kill the fish, and kills the hawk, might kill other things. So you might see some kind of complete ecological meltdown. Or some environmentalist/scientist might dissect the hawk and find that it died from unnatural causes, and if it was a protected species there would be an investigation, they could find what it last ate, and it would lead back to blasty. Which is why I said he should not only poison his own pond, but ponds all around the area, so they couldn't single his out. That way, he covers his tracks.
This is very similar to Pang Tong telling Cao Cao to chain his boats together, IMO. He would just get even more screwed in the end when they find him. Plus how would he not get caught by the neighbors? He would have to seduce all the wives.
|
On October 18 2011 06:52 Kaal wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2011 06:44 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:42 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:39 Gao Xi wrote:On October 18 2011 06:34 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:33 Kaal wrote:
Actually if you poison the fish in order to poison the predators it's a violation of law, and you'd definitely be prosecuted for it. I've heard of cases like that all the time.
Your best bet is to somehow frame one of your neighbors, perhaps putting a heat-guided crossbow on their roof in order to shoot the birds so that you don't get the blame. Well the thing is, how would he get caught? Would the police know to investigate his fish pond when hawks start showing up dead? He could also poison the fish in other areas as well, to cover his trail. He wouldn't get caught, cause when someone sees the dead hawk, they probably think it died from natural causes. Well I mean whatever doesn't kill the fish, and kills the hawk, might kill other things. So you might see some kind of complete ecological meltdown. Or some environmentalist/scientist might dissect the hawk and find that it died from unnatural causes, and if it was a protected species there would be an investigation, they could find what it last ate, and it would lead back to blasty. Which is why I said he should not only poison his own pond, but ponds all around the area, so they couldn't single his out. That way, he covers his tracks. This is very similar to Pang Tong telling Cao Cao to chain his boats together, IMO. He would just get even more screwed in the end when they find him. Plus how would he not get caught by the neighbors? He would have to seduce all the wives.
how do i seduce when i am in the US
|
On October 18 2011 06:52 Kaal wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2011 06:44 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:42 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:39 Gao Xi wrote:On October 18 2011 06:34 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:33 Kaal wrote:
Actually if you poison the fish in order to poison the predators it's a violation of law, and you'd definitely be prosecuted for it. I've heard of cases like that all the time.
Your best bet is to somehow frame one of your neighbors, perhaps putting a heat-guided crossbow on their roof in order to shoot the birds so that you don't get the blame. Well the thing is, how would he get caught? Would the police know to investigate his fish pond when hawks start showing up dead? He could also poison the fish in other areas as well, to cover his trail. He wouldn't get caught, cause when someone sees the dead hawk, they probably think it died from natural causes. Well I mean whatever doesn't kill the fish, and kills the hawk, might kill other things. So you might see some kind of complete ecological meltdown. Or some environmentalist/scientist might dissect the hawk and find that it died from unnatural causes, and if it was a protected species there would be an investigation, they could find what it last ate, and it would lead back to blasty. Which is why I said he should not only poison his own pond, but ponds all around the area, so they couldn't single his out. That way, he covers his tracks. This is very similar to Pang Tong telling Cao Cao to chain his boats together, IMO. He would just get even more screwed in the end when they find him. Plus how would he not get caught by the neighbors? He would have to seduce all the wives.
He doesn't even live their anymore. When they find a bunch of ponds in the area being poisoned, don't you think they would investigate the people who actually live there?
|
On October 18 2011 07:32 Sentenal wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2011 06:52 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:44 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:42 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:39 Gao Xi wrote:On October 18 2011 06:34 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:33 Kaal wrote:
Actually if you poison the fish in order to poison the predators it's a violation of law, and you'd definitely be prosecuted for it. I've heard of cases like that all the time.
Your best bet is to somehow frame one of your neighbors, perhaps putting a heat-guided crossbow on their roof in order to shoot the birds so that you don't get the blame. Well the thing is, how would he get caught? Would the police know to investigate his fish pond when hawks start showing up dead? He could also poison the fish in other areas as well, to cover his trail. He wouldn't get caught, cause when someone sees the dead hawk, they probably think it died from natural causes. Well I mean whatever doesn't kill the fish, and kills the hawk, might kill other things. So you might see some kind of complete ecological meltdown. Or some environmentalist/scientist might dissect the hawk and find that it died from unnatural causes, and if it was a protected species there would be an investigation, they could find what it last ate, and it would lead back to blasty. Which is why I said he should not only poison his own pond, but ponds all around the area, so they couldn't single his out. That way, he covers his tracks. This is very similar to Pang Tong telling Cao Cao to chain his boats together, IMO. He would just get even more screwed in the end when they find him. Plus how would he not get caught by the neighbors? He would have to seduce all the wives. He doesn't even live their anymore. When they find a bunch of ponds in the area being poisoned, don't you think they would investigate the people who actually live there?
my house keeper isn't a ninja that flies rooftop to rooftop to poison other people's roof top ponds
|
On October 18 2011 07:39 Blasterion wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2011 07:32 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:52 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:44 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:42 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:39 Gao Xi wrote:On October 18 2011 06:34 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:33 Kaal wrote:
Actually if you poison the fish in order to poison the predators it's a violation of law, and you'd definitely be prosecuted for it. I've heard of cases like that all the time.
Your best bet is to somehow frame one of your neighbors, perhaps putting a heat-guided crossbow on their roof in order to shoot the birds so that you don't get the blame. Well the thing is, how would he get caught? Would the police know to investigate his fish pond when hawks start showing up dead? He could also poison the fish in other areas as well, to cover his trail. He wouldn't get caught, cause when someone sees the dead hawk, they probably think it died from natural causes. Well I mean whatever doesn't kill the fish, and kills the hawk, might kill other things. So you might see some kind of complete ecological meltdown. Or some environmentalist/scientist might dissect the hawk and find that it died from unnatural causes, and if it was a protected species there would be an investigation, they could find what it last ate, and it would lead back to blasty. Which is why I said he should not only poison his own pond, but ponds all around the area, so they couldn't single his out. That way, he covers his tracks. This is very similar to Pang Tong telling Cao Cao to chain his boats together, IMO. He would just get even more screwed in the end when they find him. Plus how would he not get caught by the neighbors? He would have to seduce all the wives. He doesn't even live their anymore. When they find a bunch of ponds in the area being poisoned, don't you think they would investigate the people who actually live there? my house keeper isn't a ninja that flies rooftop to rooftop to poison other people's roof top ponds
Well you wouldn't have to necessarily hire your housekeeper. There are professionals that do these kinds of things.
|
This thread is awesome. Why is it not featured?
|
On October 18 2011 07:40 Kaal wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2011 07:39 Blasterion wrote:On October 18 2011 07:32 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:52 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:44 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:42 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:39 Gao Xi wrote:On October 18 2011 06:34 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:33 Kaal wrote:
Actually if you poison the fish in order to poison the predators it's a violation of law, and you'd definitely be prosecuted for it. I've heard of cases like that all the time.
Your best bet is to somehow frame one of your neighbors, perhaps putting a heat-guided crossbow on their roof in order to shoot the birds so that you don't get the blame. Well the thing is, how would he get caught? Would the police know to investigate his fish pond when hawks start showing up dead? He could also poison the fish in other areas as well, to cover his trail. He wouldn't get caught, cause when someone sees the dead hawk, they probably think it died from natural causes. Well I mean whatever doesn't kill the fish, and kills the hawk, might kill other things. So you might see some kind of complete ecological meltdown. Or some environmentalist/scientist might dissect the hawk and find that it died from unnatural causes, and if it was a protected species there would be an investigation, they could find what it last ate, and it would lead back to blasty. Which is why I said he should not only poison his own pond, but ponds all around the area, so they couldn't single his out. That way, he covers his tracks. This is very similar to Pang Tong telling Cao Cao to chain his boats together, IMO. He would just get even more screwed in the end when they find him. Plus how would he not get caught by the neighbors? He would have to seduce all the wives. He doesn't even live their anymore. When they find a bunch of ponds in the area being poisoned, don't you think they would investigate the people who actually live there? my house keeper isn't a ninja that flies rooftop to rooftop to poison other people's roof top ponds Well you wouldn't have to necessarily hire your housekeeper. There are professionals that do these kinds of things.
Rofl I wasn't going to post my idea but as this makes just as much sense, strap bombs to the fish that will go off if it senses a change in water/oxygen. and hope they don't jump out of the pool at any point in time. If it is the house keeper you'll hear about it later.
|
On October 18 2011 07:40 Kaal wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2011 07:39 Blasterion wrote:On October 18 2011 07:32 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:52 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:44 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:42 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:39 Gao Xi wrote:On October 18 2011 06:34 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:33 Kaal wrote:
Actually if you poison the fish in order to poison the predators it's a violation of law, and you'd definitely be prosecuted for it. I've heard of cases like that all the time.
Your best bet is to somehow frame one of your neighbors, perhaps putting a heat-guided crossbow on their roof in order to shoot the birds so that you don't get the blame. Well the thing is, how would he get caught? Would the police know to investigate his fish pond when hawks start showing up dead? He could also poison the fish in other areas as well, to cover his trail. He wouldn't get caught, cause when someone sees the dead hawk, they probably think it died from natural causes. Well I mean whatever doesn't kill the fish, and kills the hawk, might kill other things. So you might see some kind of complete ecological meltdown. Or some environmentalist/scientist might dissect the hawk and find that it died from unnatural causes, and if it was a protected species there would be an investigation, they could find what it last ate, and it would lead back to blasty. Which is why I said he should not only poison his own pond, but ponds all around the area, so they couldn't single his out. That way, he covers his tracks. This is very similar to Pang Tong telling Cao Cao to chain his boats together, IMO. He would just get even more screwed in the end when they find him. Plus how would he not get caught by the neighbors? He would have to seduce all the wives. He doesn't even live their anymore. When they find a bunch of ponds in the area being poisoned, don't you think they would investigate the people who actually live there? my house keeper isn't a ninja that flies rooftop to rooftop to poison other people's roof top ponds Well you wouldn't have to necessarily hire your housekeeper. There are professionals that do these kinds of things.
but then again I would like a maid over a housekeeper, some one that's no a grandmother, in their 20s maybe, and possibly have ninja skills
|
On October 18 2011 07:39 Blasterion wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2011 07:32 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:52 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:44 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:42 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:39 Gao Xi wrote:On October 18 2011 06:34 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:33 Kaal wrote:
Actually if you poison the fish in order to poison the predators it's a violation of law, and you'd definitely be prosecuted for it. I've heard of cases like that all the time.
Your best bet is to somehow frame one of your neighbors, perhaps putting a heat-guided crossbow on their roof in order to shoot the birds so that you don't get the blame. Well the thing is, how would he get caught? Would the police know to investigate his fish pond when hawks start showing up dead? He could also poison the fish in other areas as well, to cover his trail. He wouldn't get caught, cause when someone sees the dead hawk, they probably think it died from natural causes. Well I mean whatever doesn't kill the fish, and kills the hawk, might kill other things. So you might see some kind of complete ecological meltdown. Or some environmentalist/scientist might dissect the hawk and find that it died from unnatural causes, and if it was a protected species there would be an investigation, they could find what it last ate, and it would lead back to blasty. Which is why I said he should not only poison his own pond, but ponds all around the area, so they couldn't single his out. That way, he covers his tracks. This is very similar to Pang Tong telling Cao Cao to chain his boats together, IMO. He would just get even more screwed in the end when they find him. Plus how would he not get caught by the neighbors? He would have to seduce all the wives. He doesn't even live their anymore. When they find a bunch of ponds in the area being poisoned, don't you think they would investigate the people who actually live there? my house keeper isn't a ninja that flies rooftop to rooftop to poison other people's roof top ponds
Well then, go hire a ninja.
BTW, how does it make you feel that this blog is more popular than your Guide to Yuri?
|
On October 18 2011 07:46 Sentenal wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2011 07:39 Blasterion wrote:On October 18 2011 07:32 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:52 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:44 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:42 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:39 Gao Xi wrote:On October 18 2011 06:34 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:33 Kaal wrote:
Actually if you poison the fish in order to poison the predators it's a violation of law, and you'd definitely be prosecuted for it. I've heard of cases like that all the time.
Your best bet is to somehow frame one of your neighbors, perhaps putting a heat-guided crossbow on their roof in order to shoot the birds so that you don't get the blame. Well the thing is, how would he get caught? Would the police know to investigate his fish pond when hawks start showing up dead? He could also poison the fish in other areas as well, to cover his trail. He wouldn't get caught, cause when someone sees the dead hawk, they probably think it died from natural causes. Well I mean whatever doesn't kill the fish, and kills the hawk, might kill other things. So you might see some kind of complete ecological meltdown. Or some environmentalist/scientist might dissect the hawk and find that it died from unnatural causes, and if it was a protected species there would be an investigation, they could find what it last ate, and it would lead back to blasty. Which is why I said he should not only poison his own pond, but ponds all around the area, so they couldn't single his out. That way, he covers his tracks. This is very similar to Pang Tong telling Cao Cao to chain his boats together, IMO. He would just get even more screwed in the end when they find him. Plus how would he not get caught by the neighbors? He would have to seduce all the wives. He doesn't even live their anymore. When they find a bunch of ponds in the area being poisoned, don't you think they would investigate the people who actually live there? my house keeper isn't a ninja that flies rooftop to rooftop to poison other people's roof top ponds Well then, go hire a ninja. BTW, how does it make you feel that this blog is more popular than your Guide to Yuri?
I cry a little on the inside
|
On October 18 2011 02:53 Kupon3ss wrote:
From my vast amounts of anecdotal experience living in Chengdu and being an avid fisherman, I'd assume the death of the fish is probably the resultant of environmental factors. The worsening of the pollution in Chengdu most likely exacerbated the aging of the fish as they approached the end of their natural life-cycles. The lack of minnows in said pool is probably the best indicator of this bio-crysis many years in the making.
Carp can live so long...
I blame Hawk.
|
On October 18 2011 07:47 Blasterion wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2011 07:46 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 07:39 Blasterion wrote:On October 18 2011 07:32 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:52 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:44 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:42 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:39 Gao Xi wrote:On October 18 2011 06:34 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:33 Kaal wrote:
Actually if you poison the fish in order to poison the predators it's a violation of law, and you'd definitely be prosecuted for it. I've heard of cases like that all the time.
Your best bet is to somehow frame one of your neighbors, perhaps putting a heat-guided crossbow on their roof in order to shoot the birds so that you don't get the blame. Well the thing is, how would he get caught? Would the police know to investigate his fish pond when hawks start showing up dead? He could also poison the fish in other areas as well, to cover his trail. He wouldn't get caught, cause when someone sees the dead hawk, they probably think it died from natural causes. Well I mean whatever doesn't kill the fish, and kills the hawk, might kill other things. So you might see some kind of complete ecological meltdown. Or some environmentalist/scientist might dissect the hawk and find that it died from unnatural causes, and if it was a protected species there would be an investigation, they could find what it last ate, and it would lead back to blasty. Which is why I said he should not only poison his own pond, but ponds all around the area, so they couldn't single his out. That way, he covers his tracks. This is very similar to Pang Tong telling Cao Cao to chain his boats together, IMO. He would just get even more screwed in the end when they find him. Plus how would he not get caught by the neighbors? He would have to seduce all the wives. He doesn't even live their anymore. When they find a bunch of ponds in the area being poisoned, don't you think they would investigate the people who actually live there? my house keeper isn't a ninja that flies rooftop to rooftop to poison other people's roof top ponds Well then, go hire a ninja. BTW, how does it make you feel that this blog is more popular than your Guide to Yuri? I cry a little on the inside
Not everyone likes Yuri bro.
But it's okay. You get my vote for best thread in the last month.
|
On October 18 2011 07:47 Blasterion wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2011 07:46 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 07:39 Blasterion wrote:On October 18 2011 07:32 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:52 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:44 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:42 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:39 Gao Xi wrote:On October 18 2011 06:34 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:33 Kaal wrote:
Actually if you poison the fish in order to poison the predators it's a violation of law, and you'd definitely be prosecuted for it. I've heard of cases like that all the time.
Your best bet is to somehow frame one of your neighbors, perhaps putting a heat-guided crossbow on their roof in order to shoot the birds so that you don't get the blame. Well the thing is, how would he get caught? Would the police know to investigate his fish pond when hawks start showing up dead? He could also poison the fish in other areas as well, to cover his trail. He wouldn't get caught, cause when someone sees the dead hawk, they probably think it died from natural causes. Well I mean whatever doesn't kill the fish, and kills the hawk, might kill other things. So you might see some kind of complete ecological meltdown. Or some environmentalist/scientist might dissect the hawk and find that it died from unnatural causes, and if it was a protected species there would be an investigation, they could find what it last ate, and it would lead back to blasty. Which is why I said he should not only poison his own pond, but ponds all around the area, so they couldn't single his out. That way, he covers his tracks. This is very similar to Pang Tong telling Cao Cao to chain his boats together, IMO. He would just get even more screwed in the end when they find him. Plus how would he not get caught by the neighbors? He would have to seduce all the wives. He doesn't even live their anymore. When they find a bunch of ponds in the area being poisoned, don't you think they would investigate the people who actually live there? my house keeper isn't a ninja that flies rooftop to rooftop to poison other people's roof top ponds Well then, go hire a ninja. BTW, how does it make you feel that this blog is more popular than your Guide to Yuri? I cry a little on the inside
In one day, this blog already has more replies than your Yuri Guide. I guess that means people are much more interested in booby trapping fish and getting away with it, than Yuri.
Also, I just had a great idea. Instead of framing your neighbors, wouldn't your housekeeper be the best fall-guy? Just secretly lay a trap in your own pond, without even letting your housekeeper know. And then, once the poison is tracked back to your place, you can be like "Dude, I live in the US, how exactly did I poison a pond in China". And that would leave your housekeeper as the #1 most likely person to take the fall.
|
On October 18 2011 07:50 Sentenal wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2011 07:47 Blasterion wrote:On October 18 2011 07:46 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 07:39 Blasterion wrote:On October 18 2011 07:32 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:52 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:44 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:42 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:39 Gao Xi wrote:On October 18 2011 06:34 Sentenal wrote:
[quote]
Well the thing is, how would he get caught? Would the police know to investigate his fish pond when hawks start showing up dead? He could also poison the fish in other areas as well, to cover his trail. He wouldn't get caught, cause when someone sees the dead hawk, they probably think it died from natural causes. Well I mean whatever doesn't kill the fish, and kills the hawk, might kill other things. So you might see some kind of complete ecological meltdown. Or some environmentalist/scientist might dissect the hawk and find that it died from unnatural causes, and if it was a protected species there would be an investigation, they could find what it last ate, and it would lead back to blasty. Which is why I said he should not only poison his own pond, but ponds all around the area, so they couldn't single his out. That way, he covers his tracks. This is very similar to Pang Tong telling Cao Cao to chain his boats together, IMO. He would just get even more screwed in the end when they find him. Plus how would he not get caught by the neighbors? He would have to seduce all the wives. He doesn't even live their anymore. When they find a bunch of ponds in the area being poisoned, don't you think they would investigate the people who actually live there? my house keeper isn't a ninja that flies rooftop to rooftop to poison other people's roof top ponds Well then, go hire a ninja. BTW, how does it make you feel that this blog is more popular than your Guide to Yuri? I cry a little on the inside In one day, this blog already has more replies than your Yuri Guide. I guess that means people are much more interested in booby trapping fish and getting away with it, than Yuri. Also, I just had a great idea. Instead of framing your neighbors, wouldn't your housekeeper be the best fall-guy? Just secretly lay a trap in your own pond, without even letting your housekeeper know. And then, once the poison is tracked back to your place, you can be like "Dude, I live in the US, how exactly did I poison a pond in China". And that would leave your housekeeper as the #1 most likely person to take the fall.
That is sickly brilliant good job sending her to jail is the best excuse to ask my step mother to hire a new house keeper hopefully a maid, which unfortunately I'll almost never get to see =(
|
On October 18 2011 07:43 OmniEulogy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2011 07:40 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 07:39 Blasterion wrote:On October 18 2011 07:32 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:52 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:44 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:42 Kaal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:39 Gao Xi wrote:On October 18 2011 06:34 Sentenal wrote:On October 18 2011 06:33 Kaal wrote:
Actually if you poison the fish in order to poison the predators it's a violation of law, and you'd definitely be prosecuted for it. I've heard of cases like that all the time.
Your best bet is to somehow frame one of your neighbors, perhaps putting a heat-guided crossbow on their roof in order to shoot the birds so that you don't get the blame. Well the thing is, how would he get caught? Would the police know to investigate his fish pond when hawks start showing up dead? He could also poison the fish in other areas as well, to cover his trail. He wouldn't get caught, cause when someone sees the dead hawk, they probably think it died from natural causes. Well I mean whatever doesn't kill the fish, and kills the hawk, might kill other things. So you might see some kind of complete ecological meltdown. Or some environmentalist/scientist might dissect the hawk and find that it died from unnatural causes, and if it was a protected species there would be an investigation, they could find what it last ate, and it would lead back to blasty. Which is why I said he should not only poison his own pond, but ponds all around the area, so they couldn't single his out. That way, he covers his tracks. This is very similar to Pang Tong telling Cao Cao to chain his boats together, IMO. He would just get even more screwed in the end when they find him. Plus how would he not get caught by the neighbors? He would have to seduce all the wives. He doesn't even live their anymore. When they find a bunch of ponds in the area being poisoned, don't you think they would investigate the people who actually live there? my house keeper isn't a ninja that flies rooftop to rooftop to poison other people's roof top ponds Well you wouldn't have to necessarily hire your housekeeper. There are professionals that do these kinds of things. Rofl I wasn't going to post my idea but as this makes just as much sense, strap bombs to the fish that will go off if it senses a change in water/oxygen. and hope they don't jump out of the pool at any point in time. If it is the house keeper you'll hear about it later.
Should get the fire to wear steal plated armor with spikes =0
But on another note/mini rant
Man, It's so hard to take care of my estate when abroad >.<, but seriously, If I can get a condo like that in the US I'd be good, yet I share an apartment with a roommate here. Why is all my good/useful assets not in the country I live in.
|
fail
User was warned for this post
|
so today I fired my housekeeper, as for her replacement, I'll just think of something I guess
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
