EPTIt's not "per say". It's spelled "per se", it's latin.
You're welcome. Good night.
Feel free to correct any common mistake that wakens the grammar nazi inside you.
Bug Fix
| Blogs > Kukaracha |
|
Kukaracha
France1954 Posts
It's not "per say". It's spelled "per se", it's latin. You're welcome. Good night. Feel free to correct any common mistake that wakens the grammar nazi inside you. | ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
(I thought of putting in an intentional spelling error for someone else to catch, but figured they'd think it was an actual error, as opposed to a purposeful mistake) | ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
On September 07 2011 09:45 Mr. Wiggles wrote: "Latin" should be capitalized. :p So should be Nazi?  | ||
|
andycz
288 Posts
On September 07 2011 09:45 Mr. Wiggles wrote: "Latin" should be capitalized. :p (I thought of putting in an intentional spelling error for someone else to catch, but figured they'd think it was an actual error, as opposed to a purposeful mistake) But isn't that the whole point of doing this? | ||
|
Kukaracha
France1954 Posts
Actually I do remember my very feminine and yet male high school English teacher telling me about this rule. But I'm never sure, do you always capitalize a language or nationality? I will leave this mistake unedited for educational purposes. | ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
It depends. If he's referring to National Socialists in a historic sense, then yes, but as a derogatory term, then it can be lowercase as well. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Nazi 3. Sometimes Offensive . ( often lowercase ) a person who is fanatically dedicated to or seeks to control a specified activity, practice, etc.: a jazz nazi who disdains other forms of music; tobacco nazis trying to ban smoking. | ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
On September 07 2011 09:52 Mr. Wiggles wrote: It depends. If he's referring to National Socialists in a historic sense, then yes, but as a derogatory term, then it can be lowercase as well. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Nazi God damnit, almost were 100% correct. Thanks though. | ||
tofucake
Hyrule18937 Posts
| ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
On September 07 2011 09:58 tofucake wrote: Should be "dammit" btw; and also "awakens" not "wakens". I think them misspelling something was the point.  | ||
|
Alejandrisha
United States6565 Posts
On September 07 2011 09:38 Kukaracha wrote: Hi TL, It's not "per say". It's spelled "per se", it's latin. You're welcome. Good night. Feel free to correct any common mistake that wakens the grammar nazi inside you. Inside of you maybe? Idk is one right and one wrong or do they both fly? | ||
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
| ||
|
drmaul
United States51 Posts
| ||
|
jorge_the_awesome
United States463 Posts
| ||
|
LML
Germany1734 Posts
On September 07 2011 10:33 jorge_the_awesome wrote: It really irks me when people use chatspeak in real life. Yea, people who say "Lol" instead of laughing, just glorious! What might annoy the most are people saying "your" instead of "you are" or "you're", as "your" is actually a real word and as it seems more than 70% of the people seem to use it wrong nowadays, so you slightly start to read it as "you're" already and when there is actually a sentence containing the real "your" word you have to reread it because you already read it as "you're" and the sentence doesn't make sense. I believe there was something else that got so populated but I don't remember right now. | ||
|
Magus
Canada450 Posts
On September 07 2011 09:58 tofucake wrote: Should be "dammit" btw; and also "awakens" not "wakens". Should also be "was" and not "were" in the post with dammit. Hell we can go farther and say it should be, "God dammit. I was almost 100% correct. My thanks though," just to be completely proper. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43529 Posts
On September 07 2011 09:38 Kukaracha wrote: Hi TL, It's not "per say". It's spelled "per se", it's latin. You're welcome. Good night. Feel free to correct any common mistake that wakens the grammar nazi inside you. You should be using a semicolon after "per se", not a comma. You're separating two independent clauses. | ||
|
Kukaracha
France1954 Posts
Oh, and "omnubilated" doesn't exist. It's spelled "obnubilated". "Ob" = above if I recall corectly, "nubes" = clouds. | ||
|
LML
Germany1734 Posts
| ||
|
Alejandrisha
United States6565 Posts
| ||
| ||
