Rank 1 Master + UofT Fighting Article

slained

Canada966 Posts

January 11 2011 20:08 GMT

ALso a CSL article written a few weeks ago got published about the uoft team,

I'm Long Do btw:
JPG version:
http://imgur.com/Uq060.jpg

PDF version
http://individual.utoronto.ca/dolong/CSLarticle.pdf

edit: fix

edit: already dropped ranksapparently therse a bug you cant lose points in master, or you're never favoured

KoKoRo

United States186 Posts

January 11 2011 20:29 GMT

I just made master's too! :O I went from 2800+ to 2327 so I guess that was my actual Points? Anywho.

andiCR

Costa Rica2273 Posts

January 11 2011 20:46 GMT

mm nice, ill see if i get master division too :D

kineSiS-

Korea (South)1068 Posts

January 11 2011 20:48 GMT

For some reason this new patch causes me to run the game at 5 fps. Needless to say I lost 4 games in a row...

This is coming from a 65% win ratio =[[ to like a 0000% raito now.

MacroNcheesE

United States508 Posts

January 11 2011 20:49 GMT

Hmm i went from 2200 diamond points to 1987 Master's points. lol, this mmr shit is so weird.

Megaliskuu

United States5123 Posts

January 11 2011 20:54 GMT

On January 12 2011 05:49 AdamFox wrote:
Hmm i went from 2200 diamond points to 1987 Master's points. lol, this mmr shit is so weird.

It depends on your bonus pool.

NrG.NeverExpo

Canada2114 Posts

January 11 2011 21:28 GMT

2200 diamond shudnt be in master's league, whats the point of even implementing a master's league if its just gunna dump all the diamond players in it?

laLAlA[uC]

Canada963 Posts

January 11 2011 21:30 GMT

It's based on MMR isn't it?
Obviously he has the skill of someone over 2.2k.

slained

Canada966 Posts

January 11 2011 21:32 GMT

yea its mmr, neverexpo knows im not but therse people 2.2k i guess. The cut off is pretty low

BlasiuS

United States2405 Posts

January 11 2011 21:42 GMT

#10

On January 12 2011 06:30 laLAlA[uC] wrote:
It's based on MMR isn't it?
Obviously he has the skill of someone over 2.2k.

yeah based on MMR, but only MMR within diamond (?)

That means people who played like 25 games, got into diamond, then stopped playing probably have a pretty bad MMR. There's a lot of these inactive players. The more inactive players there are sitting at the bottom of diamond, the easier it is to get into the top 5% of diamond.

That is, assuming that master's cutoff is the top 5% of diamond, and not the top X% overall.

edit: for reference, diamond makes up about 7.5% of all players right now. Therefore top 5% of diamond = (.05 * .075) = .00375 = about top .4% overall.

MacroNcheesE

United States508 Posts

January 11 2011 22:08 GMT

#11

Yeah, and I was only 2200 points because I didn't play much in November, and played mostly 2v2 for the first half of December, the other half I was out of town, and started playing again on Jan. 4th.

Incanus

Canada695 Posts

January 11 2011 22:31 GMT

#12

It's weird how so many people with high MMRs went to 2327 when they got promoted to Masters league. Perhaps they're still trying to mask people's MMR in the new system.

Congrats on the article btw. UofT ftw.

Please or register to reply.

Rank 1 Master + UofT Fighting Article

Completed

Ongoing

Upcoming