Again, how do you come up with this analogy? It's so random and makes no sense whatsoever.

Let's say a family has a child and the father is drafted to go fight a war. The father dies in the war and the mom is now a single mother. Because we deny homosexuals the right to adopt, that baby should be taken away from it's mother? That is logical to you? The army guys comes to tell the widow that her husband is fallen and then says "I'm sorry but we're going to have to take your kid because homosexuals can't adopt."

The way you are debating this is really strange. I never said anything about taking away a child from a single parent because homosexuals can't adopt.

Baksteen

Netherlands438 Posts

June 29 2010 20:21 GMT

#224

What is the hurt when 2 men who are homosexual adopt a child who would otherwise never have a loving family.

I am all for these kind of things, equal rights to everyone plx.

Pineapple

New Zealand126 Posts

June 29 2010 22:41 GMT

#225

Whenever I see a thread with a topic like this I just click on all pages and then control F the word 'God' then start reading from there.

Romantic

United States1844 Posts

June 29 2010 22:45 GMT

#226

On June 30 2010 07:41 Pineapple wrote:
Whenever I see a thread with a topic like this I just click on all pages and then control F the word 'God' then start reading from there.

God just told me homosexuality isn't a big deal. After all, why did he make Adam first? Adam was made in God's image. God must be a man. Despite the fact he wouldn't need a sex\gender. Guess who he made to be his friend? A man.

Solid, irrefutable logic.

a176

Canada6688 Posts

June 29 2010 23:17 GMT

#227

On June 30 2010 05:21 Baksteen wrote:
What is the hurt when 2 men who are homosexual adopt a child who would otherwise never have a loving family.

I am all for these kind of things, equal rights to everyone plx.

i agree on principal but theres so many other social factors that would make me disagree as well ...

Kashmir

New Zealand178 Posts

June 29 2010 23:52 GMT

#228

Congratulations to Iceland! I've never had a problem with gay marriage or adoption to be honest. Just one less stumbling block on the road to equality.

Masamune

Canada3401 Posts

June 30 2010 05:27 GMT

#229

On June 29 2010 22:13 Biff The Understudy wrote:

Show nested quote +

lol

How dare you?

EDIT: Actually, it made me laugh out loud. <3 Calvin & Hobbes.

I think the comic was directed at Moltke, as it sums up his posts in this thread quite well.

Saying Nietzsche can't be taken seriously also made me laugh.

[UoN]Sentinel

United States11320 Posts

July 01 2010 01:22 GMT

#230

On June 30 2010 07:45 Romantic wrote:

Show nested quote +

Adam wasn't meant to be his only friend though, and god gave him a companion so he wouldn't be lonely. This companion was a woman.

Logic refuted.

DreaM)XeRO

Korea (South)4667 Posts

July 01 2010 01:26 GMT

#231

i dont know why christians dont think gays aren't found in nature. I dont know about you but i see more gay's in nature than say.. angels?

Romantic

United States1844 Posts

July 01 2010 05:06 GMT

#232

On July 01 2010 10:22 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:

Show nested quote +

Adam wasn't meant to be his only friend though, and god gave him a companion so he wouldn't be lonely. This companion was a woman.

Logic refuted.

Crap!

Trinton07

United States70 Posts

July 01 2010 05:36 GMT

#233

On June 30 2010 02:08 BlackJack wrote:

Show nested quote +

I think what he was trying to say is that if you don't think a homosexual couple can have children it must be because you think only a man/women couple should be aloud to have children, and obviously there's not a man/women couple in the case of a single parent. Am I right?

But regardless, <3 Iceland.

Chesner

Iceland817 Posts

July 02 2010 07:20 GMT

#234

I'm really glad for the change. I don't see a reason as too why gay marriage is a bad thing.
They are people, they should be able to have their rights.

On the other hand.. this means I might have to go to a wedding this year or next.. god damn,
I hate attending weddings!