EPTOn February 07 2010 19:17 Rekrul wrote:
my old cat jumped out the 3rd floor window cuz it was too damn horny and never came back
what a slut
LOL WTFmy old cat jumped out the 3rd floor window cuz it was too damn horny and never came back
what a slut
Are some people just born bad... - Page 2
| Blogs > hymn |
|
hyst.eric.al
United States2332 Posts
| ||
DivinO
United States4796 Posts
On February 07 2010 19:17 Rekrul wrote: my old cat jumped out the 3rd floor window cuz it was too damn horny and never came back what a slut Rekrul laying down the law...? | ||
|
7mk
Germany10157 Posts
On February 07 2010 20:42 HeaDStrong wrote: it's not an uncommon or unknown fact that people are just cruel by nature, kids are the worst i think... some time later common sense kicks in and gives them some self-control. too bad you had to find this out in such a harsh way. very true, so many kids are such selfish rude fucking bastards. | ||
|
Frits
11782 Posts
On February 08 2010 00:14 G.s)NarutO wrote: I once saw a boy, he was maybe 12/13 throwing stones at a cygnet. I went to him and punched im in his fucking face. I throw a stone at him after and asked if he liked that. I'd fucking kill someone who kill a cat with an air rifle. ya totally reasonable reaction against a 12/13 year old kid fucking retard | ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
On February 08 2010 01:37 Frits wrote: ya totally reasonable reaction against a 12/13 year old kid fucking retard So what? Is it reasonable what he does? Don't tell me he's 13, he doesn't know he could kill the cygnet when throwing stones at him. Probably you have no heart? Retard. | ||
|
Sadistx
Zimbabwe5568 Posts
| ||
|
Chef
10810 Posts
 I don't think people are born bad. I don't believe in a criminal gene, and I think assuming one exists is dangerous thinking and leads to eugenics. There are traits we're all born with that can be used for 'good' or for 'evil.' I think sadism is a learned quality that all humans are capable of acquiring, though obviously that's not a good thing. The only young kids I've ever known (when growing up) that never had a cruel moment, are kids who were already suffering and knew what it was like to be on the other side of the fence. So I also think sympathy is learned from personal tragedy. Do you feel bad accidentally stepping on ants? Or purposely crushing mosquitoes? Maybe because they are like natural enemies we don't have to feel sympathy for them. I'm not saying it's wrong to feel bad for your pet cat, I'm just trying to encourage intelligent thought about what we do and don't perceive as cruel, and why. To you your cat was a furry friend who kept you company. To most people it was a cute cat, and someone's pet. To another person with little experience of the world, it was just some lower life form. The same way a cat will kill a bird, splay its intestines on the ground, and then not eat it, is the same way a kid who doesn't know cats are supposed to be pets thinks of it as target practice. So again: No, people are not born bad, or born good (whatever either of those terms really mean). | ||
|
Frits
11782 Posts
On February 08 2010 01:39 G.s)NarutO wrote: So what? Is it reasonable what he does? Don't tell me he's 13, he doesn't know he could kill the cygnet when throwing stones at him. Probably you have no heart? Retard. Did you really just use the 'he started it' argument? wow | ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
On February 08 2010 02:08 Frits wrote: Did you really just use the 'he started it' argument? wow You act like I took a whole mountain and slammed it into the kids face...;; It was a small stone, I'm not a retard, but still for me an animal is nothing to touch / harm. I would also do something over a guy being harsh to a girl. I know its a complete wrong thing, still. Sorry for calling you a retard btw-_-; .. seems we just have different opinions on that; | ||
|
Achromic
773 Posts
| ||
|
Squallcloud
France466 Posts
I totally wish the death of the guy who shot your cat. Pet or not someone who torture something for kicks deserves to die. About the kid who throw stone at cygnet, i'm conflicted i feel that he deserves the "punishment" (maybe it was a bit too much... ^^) but if i saw my kid punched by a stranger i sure won't be happy about it. xD | ||
|
StorkHwaiting
United States3465 Posts
There are serious issues with stray cat populations booming out of control and wiping out the local wildlife. It might look like a domestic little pussycat to you, but that little kitten becomes a savage motherfucker when it gets out of the house. None of you have any clue why the cat was shot. I can think of several good reasons for why someone would want to drive a cat away from their property. You cannot let a cat run wild outside of the house and expect it to be okay. People have the right to shoot a cat, which is a ruthless killer, if it goes on their property. I say this as someone who has lost HIS pets to stray cats before and have been really damn steamed about it. I've also been a cat owner before but new a lot better than to go, "Oops! Lost track of little buddy! Hope he comes back safe!" As a veterinarian, I'm sure the OP has seen numerous cases of other pets coming in with wounds from a cat attack. Or at least know the dangers of a stray cat as a carrier for disease. It's incredible to me that he would have this righteous anger about it as if anyone who dared to shoot the cat is some twisted psychopath sadist. While it could be a kid trying out his aim, it could also be someone who knows what cats can do when they're not under watch. I doubt people would freak out this badly if this was a story about a coyote being shot by a rancher. And the coyote would actually be killing other animals for his survival. Quite often, a housecat kills something and leaves it in the owner's tree. Sorry, but it's hard for me to get as lathered up in rage as some of the people here. Kitty is not as innocent and harmless as cat lovers would like to think. | ||
|
Navi
5286 Posts
On February 08 2010 02:17 G.s)NarutO wrote: You act like I took a whole mountain and slammed it into the kids face...;; It was a small stone, I'm not a retard, but still for me an animal is nothing to touch / harm. I would also do something over a guy being harsh to a girl. I know its a complete wrong thing, still. Sorry for calling you a retard btw-_-; .. seems we just have different opinions on that; Ya know fritz, attitudes like yours are what cause animal cruelty to be punished so lightly in today's world. If the boy in question was stoning a little girl, everybody would say "OMG punch that dickhole in the face!!!" But just because its a "lower life form" and probably can't philosophize about the pain its in and how easily it can be killed, its totally wrong to punish the boy in question. I personally think the punching in the face might have been pushing the point, but still, those kinds of people should learn how to empathize. They should realize how they dislike having rocks thrown at them, and thus in the future will be less likely to throw rocks at animals for no good reason. | ||
|
StorkHwaiting
United States3465 Posts
On February 08 2010 03:23 Navi wrote: Ya know fritz, attitudes like yours are what cause animal cruelty to be punished so lightly in today's world. If the boy in question was stoning a little girl, everybody would say "OMG punch that dickhole in the face!!!" But just because its a "lower life form" and probably can't philosophize about the pain its in and how easily it can be killed, its totally wrong to punish the boy in question. I personally think the punching in the face might have been pushing the point, but still, those kinds of people should learn how to empathize. They should realize how they dislike having rocks thrown at them, and thus in the future will be less likely to throw rocks at animals for no good reason. It would be ridiculously hypocritical to try to punish people for animal cruelty and then give subsidies to the agricultural industry. In my opinion, if they try to push this animal cruelty thing any further, the law would be an absolute sham. And this is coming from an animal lover who hates cruelty to animals. But I also hate illogical rationales for lawmaking. While animal cruelty is morally repugnant, it is even more repugnant to say that it is okay to abuse animals in the context of profiteering but illegal in the context of pleasure. It doesn't work. | ||
|
ThunderGod
New Zealand897 Posts
On February 08 2010 03:17 StorkHwaiting wrote: + Show Spoiler + You know, I'd feel a lot more pity if this was a dog, but I am very very much against cats being let outside of the house. You know why? Because cats go out murdering other animals 24/7 out of "instinct" and rarely even eat the animals they kill. They just do it for "fun." Strange how people condemn this imaginary kid for shooting the cat with an air rifle, yet don't think for a second the cat could be out there killing all kinds of birds, turtles, mice, etc. There are serious issues with stray cat populations booming out of control and wiping out the local wildlife. It might look like a domestic little pussycat to you, but that little kitten becomes a savage motherfucker when it gets out of the house. None of you have any clue why the cat was shot. I can think of several good reasons for why someone would want to drive a cat away from their property. You cannot let a cat run wild outside of the house and expect it to be okay. People have the right to shoot a cat, which is a ruthless killer, if it goes on their property. I say this as someone who has lost HIS pets to stray cats before and have been really damn steamed about it. I've also been a cat owner before but new a lot better than to go, "Oops! Lost track of little buddy! Hope he comes back safe!" As a veterinarian, I'm sure the OP has seen numerous cases of other pets coming in with wounds from a cat attack. Or at least know the dangers of a stray cat as a carrier for disease. It's incredible to me that he would have this righteous anger about it as if anyone who dared to shoot the cat is some twisted psychopath sadist. While it could be a kid trying out his aim, it could also be someone who knows what cats can do when they're not under watch. I doubt people would freak out this badly if this was a story about a coyote being shot by a rancher. And the coyote would actually be killing other animals for his survival. Quite often, a housecat kills something and leaves it in the owner's tree. Sorry, but it's hard for me to get as lathered up in rage as some of the people here. Kitty is not as innocent and harmless as cat lovers would like to think. Yeah but you forgot that Grey is a lovely nice cat who never hurts anything and just wants cuddles even if you slap him silly. | ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
| ||
|
Squallcloud
France466 Posts
On February 08 2010 03:17 StorkHwaiting wrote: You know, I'd feel a lot more pity if this was a dog, but I am very very much against cats being let outside of the house. You know why? Because cats go out murdering other animals 24/7 out of "instinct" and rarely even eat the animals they kill. They just do it for "fun." Strange how people condemn this imaginary kid for shooting the cat with an air rifle, yet don't think for a second the cat could be out there killing all kinds of birds, turtles, mice, etc. There are serious issues with stray cat populations booming out of control and wiping out the local wildlife. It might look like a domestic little pussycat to you, but that little kitten becomes a savage motherfucker when it gets out of the house. None of you have any clue why the cat was shot. I can think of several good reasons for why someone would want to drive a cat away from their property. You cannot let a cat run wild outside of the house and expect it to be okay. People have the right to shoot a cat, which is a ruthless killer, if it goes on their property. I say this as someone who has lost HIS pets to stray cats before and have been really damn steamed about it. I've also been a cat owner before but new a lot better than to go, "Oops! Lost track of little buddy! Hope he comes back safe!" As a veterinarian, I'm sure the OP has seen numerous cases of other pets coming in with wounds from a cat attack. Or at least know the dangers of a stray cat as a carrier for disease. It's incredible to me that he would have this righteous anger about it as if anyone who dared to shoot the cat is some twisted psychopath sadist. While it could be a kid trying out his aim, it could also be someone who knows what cats can do when they're not under watch. I doubt people would freak out this badly if this was a story about a coyote being shot by a rancher. And the coyote would actually be killing other animals for his survival. Quite often, a housecat kills something and leaves it in the owner's tree. Sorry, but it's hard for me to get as lathered up in rage as some of the people here. Kitty is not as innocent and harmless as cat lovers would like to think. It's only a cat. If it's a nuisance you shoo it away! At worse you take a broom. Taking out your gun is pushing it a bit far i think... | ||
|
Starparty
Sweden1963 Posts
On February 08 2010 00:14 G.s)NarutO wrote: I once saw a boy, he was maybe 12/13 throwing stones at a cygnet. I went to him and punched im in his fucking face. I throw a stone at him after and asked if he liked that. I'd fucking kill someone who kill a cat with an air rifle. You sir are my new idol. Seriously. I wish i had been there to see how owned that fucking retarded kid got... | ||
|
seppolevne
Canada1681 Posts
On February 08 2010 04:11 CharlieMurphy wrote: is this for real? this op in written in such a trollish manner is this for real? this post | ||
|
WindCalibur
Canada938 Posts
| ||
| ||
