EPTSo I spent $1500 to play SC... - Page 2
| Blogs > WheelOfTime |
|
Navane
Netherlands2751 Posts
| ||
|
Boblion
France8043 Posts
| ||
|
Ricjames
Czech Republic1047 Posts
| ||
|
Ricjames
Czech Republic1047 Posts
| ||
|
Whiplash
United States2929 Posts
| ||
|
Biochemist
United States1008 Posts
| ||
|
tarpman
Canada720 Posts
 *glares at his 1024x768 CRT | ||
|
WheelOfTime
Canada331 Posts
On December 23 2009 00:19 Biochemist wrote: On Nvidia vs GeForce: I've purchased maybe 6 ATI cards in my lifetime, and every single one has made me swear I would never make the same mistake again. Driver problems, compatibility issues, etc. Are they still like that or are they actually pretty decent now? ATI and Nvidia have always been relatively even in terms of value, reliability, performance, and support. There are horror stories of driver and compatibility issues for both, and high praise for both as well. At times one has the lead over the other, but eventually the other catches up and the cycle starts again. As of now, ATI offers both better value and better performance (the Radeon 5970 beats out TWO GTX295s when overclocked). Drivers and compatibility is good, although this varies from game to game. | ||
|
SixSongs
Poland1455 Posts
| ||
|
zer0das
United States8519 Posts
On December 23 2009 00:19 Biochemist wrote: On Nvidia vs GeForce: I've purchased maybe 6 ATI cards in my lifetime, and every single one has made me swear I would never make the same mistake again. Driver problems, compatibility issues, etc. Are they still like that or are they actually pretty decent now? I bought my first ATI card about 5 months ago (4850) and I haven't had many driver issues at all. Although with Team Fortress 2's recent update I got a few bsods but I think that had to do with the sound card deciding it wanted to be on two IRQ channels instead of one, and one of those happened to conflict with the card. I have no idea why that would happen on its own. | ||
|
Biochemist
United States1008 Posts
On December 23 2009 02:50 WheelOfTime wrote: ATI and Nvidia have always been relatively even in terms of value, reliability, performance, and support. There are horror stories of driver and compatibility issues for both, and high praise for both as well. At times one has the lead over the other, but eventually the other catches up and the cycle starts again. As of now, ATI offers both better value and better performance (the Radeon 5970 beats out TWO GTX295s when overclocked). Drivers and compatibility is good, although this varies from game to game. I haven't purchased an ATI card since the first Radeons came out (2002ish?), so it's good to hear that they've cleaned up their act since then. | ||
|
MiniRoman
Canada3953 Posts
PS3 ftw | ||
|
Jonoman92
United States9108 Posts
| ||
|
Jonoman92
United States9108 Posts
On December 22 2009 21:48 Boblion wrote: AMD bought ATI. Does this mean in the future ATI video cards won't work with intl mobos? | ||
|
Boblion
France8043 Posts
On December 23 2009 03:53 Jonoman92 wrote: Does this mean in the future ATI video cards won't work with intl mobos? If Intel wants to pay even more fines and new reparations to AMD maybe o,o | ||
|
phase
United States399 Posts
On December 23 2009 03:58 Boblion wrote: If Intel wants to pay even more fines and new reparations to AMD maybe o,o Lol. Hilarious, and so true. It seems Intel is getting screwed by everyone lately (EU, now FTC) | ||
| ||
