EPT![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/UND8p8B.png)
Not a big fan of the Dota 2 wiki listing DPC points earned per PLAYER alongside tournament prize money earned per TEAM, seems like a big inconsistency (e.g. it should be 30k and 90 points or 10k and 30 points for third/fourth place).
Liquipedia Feedback Thread - Page 76
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
lungalung
United States19 Posts
Not a big fan of the Dota 2 wiki listing DPC points earned per PLAYER alongside tournament prize money earned per TEAM, seems like a big inconsistency (e.g. it should be 30k and 90 points or 10k and 30 points for third/fourth place). | ||
|
rapture
Germany645 Posts
| ||
Clubfan
Germany913 Posts
| ||
|
canetoado1
3 Posts
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Special:PendingChanges More than 1 month later and changes aren't even in. Meanwhile, there is history being made in tournaments every other week... | ||
CynicalDeath
Italy3518 Posts
| ||
|
RadgeRayden
20 Posts
| ||
|
canetoado1
3 Posts
| ||
|
SunnyChoppers
1 Post
Recently I made a Liquid account so I too can also edit/update Liquipedia's CSGO section when need be, and I have a few things to bring up. I wanted to update Team Liquid's CSGO page since nitr0 has been IGL for Liquid since Mykonos. On the banner on the right side of the page, it still listed stanislaw (at the time) as team captain despite on the player list the blue crown indicating captain/IGL to be nitr0. I proceeded to update the page to make the change, and an admin declined the change despite nitr0 being the IGL for over two months now. Secondly, for IEM Oakland going on currently, I was going through the info for the matches the night before, and when clicking on the "i" button for the HLTV match page for Team Liquid and Faze, it directed me to Renegades and Gambit's match. I know it is easy to oversight something like this, but I feel like the admins could do a little better in terms of making sure we have the right info posted on tournament pages, team pages, player pages etc so that people who go to Liquipedia on the daily basis can know that we do an excellent job making sure that we update the sight with the correct and factual information. I have nothing against Liquipedia; I believe this is one of the best esports sites on the web, but there is nothing wrong with stepping up some to make sure we have the correct and factual info on Liquipedia. Thanks. | ||
tofucake
Hyrule19180 Posts
| ||
FO-nTTaX
Johto4958 Posts
| ||
|
razarza
Australia21 Posts
On November 15 2017 09:55 SunnyChoppers wrote: + Show Spoiler + Hi Recently I made a Liquid account so I too can also edit/update Liquipedia's CSGO section when need be, and I have a few things to bring up. I wanted to update Team Liquid's CSGO page since nitr0 has been IGL for Liquid since Mykonos. On the banner on the right side of the page, it still listed stanislaw (at the time) as team captain despite on the player list the blue crown indicating captain/IGL to be nitr0. I proceeded to update the page to make the change, and an admin declined the change despite nitr0 being the IGL for over two months now. Secondly, for IEM Oakland going on currently, I was going through the info for the matches the night before, and when clicking on the "i" button for the HLTV match page for Team Liquid and Faze, it directed me to Renegades and Gambit's match. I know it is easy to oversight something like this, but I feel like the admins could do a little better in terms of making sure we have the right info posted on tournament pages, team pages, player pages etc so that people who go to Liquipedia on the daily basis can know that we do an excellent job making sure that we update the sight with the correct and factual information. I have nothing against Liquipedia; I believe this is one of the best esports sites on the web, but there is nothing wrong with stepping up some to make sure we have the correct and factual info on Liquipedia. Thanks. Copy of my Discord message: I would also hope that you can understand that mistakes can occasionally happen such as the wrong HLTV page being linked when there are thousands of edits made every month to the CS wiki, you can see some editor stats here http://wiki.teamliquid.net/statistics/?view=activeusers&wikis[]=counterstrike Also with high traffiic pages such as a live premier tournament there will always be a couple people trying to update the page as fast (sometimes too fast) as possible and like tofucake says, admins are not checking over every single edit. The basic hierarchy of users goes like this: User - can make edits, need to be approved (you) Editor - can approve edits and move pages (users with automatically checked edits) http://wiki.teamliquid.net/counterstrike/index.php?title=Intel_Extreme_Masters/Season_XII/Oakland&action=history Admin - (liquipedia staff such as myself or shen)^ | ||
|
Qazior
Finland2 Posts
This idea came to my mind because there are often tournaments with lots of info such as talent lists first in the tournament pages that I have already scrolled over 50 times when I rather just go check the bracket. Now that I think of it, maybe I could get used to the content space on the left  Anyway, what do people think about this? Is it too redundant? | ||
|
Clubfan
Germany913 Posts
A possible option is adding a {{#vardefine:current_stage|CURRENT_STAGE}} before each stage, but that seems to be a lot of work. Alternatively, one might do something similar automatically with an extension for MediaWiki, but that seems to be a lot of work. If someone has a simpler/better idea for how to make it work, feel free to suggest it. | ||
|
-NegativeZero-
United States2142 Posts
| ||
|
FO-nTTaX
Johto4958 Posts
| ||
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
On November 27 2017 21:14 FO-nTTaX wrote: As a historical reference probably yes, but the LotV one FTFY | ||
|
DeadAntelope
4 Posts
| ||
|
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
| ||
|
DeadAntelope
4 Posts
On December 01 2017 01:06 salle wrote: That is fairly easy to add yes, but do we have those numbers? I've noticed events usually tweet out how many tickets they sold, or put together a press release after with how much engagement they had e.g. attendance, peak stream viewers etc. Would involve digging around but I think it would be cool to see how tournaments and attendance grew over the years. | ||
|
Seldon_
2 Posts
Also you can implement settings show/don't show results | ||
| ||
