EPT[GG] Mafia XII - The Summer Season
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 03 2009 07:38 BloodyC0bbler wrote: OK first off I AM RUNNING FOR OFFICE I am already seeing idiocy of players that has led to many vets getting insanely discouraged with playing these games. I appreciate Plexa for trying to make this game interesting with the addition of different roles, tweaking how some work, and the addition of fog. Now lets outline why I should be in office. You make it sound as if your campaign is "I'm smart, you're all idiots, that's why I should be in office" | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 03 2009 14:12 motbob wrote: A solid campaign, considering how the elected officials acted in Pyrr's game. EDIT: took out unnecessary "the" Which is exactly my point. JeeJee ran under the premise he was experienced, and he was one of the main reasons the town lost. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 03 2009 14:40 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: Well, not much else to talk about until day post / voting thread, I guess. Oh I beg to differ. We've got elections to worry about. I know you're hard set on your vote but with only three candidates there's a lot to worry about. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 03 2009 16:07 HeavOnEarth wrote: soo. i wonder if mafia players have their roles yet That is by far the most useless post in this topic, and that's quite a feat considering there's already a bunch of other useless posts. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 03 2009 16:13 BloodyC0bbler wrote: And hey a bunch of useless posts by you. Heres some tips for you. Stop just insulting people and post something useful towards the town, like possible avenues for the town to win, or to deal with mafia, etc... we have three people running for office, of those three two have provided some form of platform, So concentrate on voting for two people. This creates as L said, vote lists to check later. Oh yes I'm sorry, I should be listening to you because you're smarter than me and a better player than me right? Even though you hardly know anything about me you must be a better player than me, it only makes sense. The fact that you think my posts are useless (I know some of them are relax) just shows how annoying you are. And I'll be damned if when you're elected Emperor you don't lynch MrBabyHands; I'm sure you're just going to wait until tomorrow to actually start figuring out the mafia. See I've competently lead(along with sog) a town to victory in a elected position, and we manhandled the mafia. The people I've talked to seem to think this is an incredible exaggeration, but I'm going to assume that's just a minor discrepancy. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 04 2009 01:48 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: ... And it's a better reason than reducing mafia kp night 1 by voting for foggy? Praytell, redtooth, what trickery is this? On a sidenote i wish this is how the weather was like in real life. Don't want to go to school today? Vote snow!! Even if you were an assassin, using a kill the first night when there's not as much information to go around is risky. Assassins are better off waiting until we can pin down for sure suspects. Right now fog is probably the best option, go read through Pyrry's and BC's posts as they have the best reasoning. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 04 2009 06:10 HeavOnEarth wrote: Actually, at this point i believe BC is town aligned and i encourage people to vote for him as he will have mine. Earlier you said that you can "almost guarentee" that one of you, L, and BC is the Godfather. Based on this statement, does that mean you now think L is the Godfather? Unless you want to claim to be the Godfather instead... | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 04 2009 06:24 JeeJee wrote: I run for office. That's a joke right? | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 04 2009 07:47 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: This has gotta be the least active game ever  nothing has really happened in the last 6 hours. I guess JeeJee started running and Heavonearth finally gave a platform but meh. Not good for town.How's this not good for the town? | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
I realize that there is a whole slew of problems with this, such as choosing another person who's innocent, DT randomly dying anyways, etc. It's just an idea. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 05 2009 05:53 MrBabyHands wrote: so it looks like emperor will either be L or BC. provided they're innocent, either would make good a good emp. but not as good as me. although its a little late, since we have lots of hours left to vote and since the votes look about even, i'd like to announce my run for emperor. i could write a post about why i'm qualified and other assorted crap, but i honestly dont think it'd make a difference-- we're all familiar with each others playing styles. so i made some quick notes instead: -i pretty much just need the BG protection while i analyze -i run a tight ship, i'm not easy to trick, and i'm accurate -it'll be easy to tell if i'm dirty: with BG protection, i have no reason to lay low. which means if i'm innocent i'll be actively hunting the mafia (and getting them too). anyway-- thats my platform. vote for the babyhands. I assume you're just running for emperor because you know L/BC are going to lynch you first, which explains you're lack of any useful information. And if you do happen to get elected, if you don't kill a mafia first night I'm sure BC/L and other important players are going to move to lynch you the next day. That being said I'm sure you've already figured out someone who is mafia (under the assumption that you are not mafia of course) so you should just probably come out with it now, or at the very least PM the important people about it. Either way you're time alive is very short, if you have useful information you're better off sharing it, not making useless posts about running for emperor with some "quick notes" that are as useless as JeeJee's campaign. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 06 2009 03:10 L wrote: I don't really mind sacrificing the priest to absorb a night's worth of hits, but we didn't need to go and kill off MBH specifically to make that threat. The moment ANYONE is killed and ressed, he is confirmed. The side advantage of hitting someone who has a higher proportion chance of being mafia is that on the odd chance that the hit flips red, we gain a massive amount of information and get rather ahead in the game. Earlier you had stated if elected you would've killed BC. Your reasoning makes it sound that BC should've killed you instead of MrBabyHands. You're advocating that killing MrBabyHands was a bad idea (or at the very least, there was better options) yet the other alternative that YOU suggest would be BC killing you. That being said, had it still been up to you, who would you have lynched that's not BC? | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 06 2009 06:54 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: BONUS: JeeJee: "also shikyo is mafia" That is by far the most brilliant post in this mafia game. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 06 2009 12:41 Faronel wrote: Edit: Is it at all possible that both bockit and vx70gto are mafia? Do you have any reasons why you suspect this? | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 06 2009 14:59 HeavOnEarth wrote: so like, L's posts are getting buried under a lot of shit. You need to change that "shit" to "good analysis", then move the shit in between "L's" and "posts", then change sad face to happy face. All better! | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 07 2009 01:37 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Also, I do not think ydg's posts are deliberately misleading at all, but rather reflect someone simply changing his mind as he learns more about the game. Some of your analysis is off as well BC. You need to read posts in the context of the thread, not in a vacuum. For example ydg goes "if the priest roleclaims publicaly, once we have the mafia down to 4 kp, put all angels on him and vote rain every day, mafia can never kill the priest." You takes this and reply with "Ydg wants us to concentrate on finding out who the priest is." This seems to me like a deliberate twisting of his words - ydg posted a possible plan of action in the case of the priest publically revealing himself - not a plan to figure out the priest, which could only be done through clues. It's a stupid plan and obviously not worth the effort, but maybe that is why absolutely nobody replied to it! The entirety of your post is like this. I'm not going to discuss every piece of it. It really gives off the impression that you are grasping at straws here, rather than forming an insightful analysis of someone's postings. My advice applies to everyone: READ POSTS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE THREAD, NOT IN A VACUUM iNfuNdiBuLuM, you have abstained from voting thus far. If you really think ydg is innocent, why have you not taken any direct action against it? The vote (at least right now) is close and you have yet to accuse anyone else or suggest that someone else be lynched instead of ydg. That being said, the summary of your post here reads, "We should not listen to BC, but I could care less who dies". It seems to me you are against BC, not against ydg being lynched. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 07 2009 06:29 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: And yes, at this point I think ydg is innocent. I would prefer not lynch him. If he does get lynched, his alignment will play a large part in how we think about BC. Are we willing to give up a day just for that, when he can be rolechecked? Also, I take it we are not double lynching today? BC hasn't said anything about that I don't think. Personally I don't think we have any strong enough suspects to o a double lynch. If we do it next day, we can create 2 lists to be checked as long as Fog isn't voted in. Do you think the DT's are in a good position to be list checking right now? I believe it was previously discussed that list checkings are useful only if coordinated properly. It seems a bit early for that to be happening. Not to mention, 13 people still haven't voted. What if none of the pledges have voted yet? So much for list checking.... | ||
| ||
