|
4492 Posts
I think I have explained myself pretty clearly last game, so I'll keep this short: This is pretty poor play by BC, and all his reasonings are faulty. Why? Refer to my post in previous game, same applies here. Waaay tooo many possibilities that we can't account for.
Also, the VI hasn't revealed himself to help the Town (this time he needs it a lot more, because he can be killed at night), neither is anybody else acting nuts ATM. However, for the VI, the best strategy is to act ASAP, before he can be killed (Night 1), so the VI IS acting already, I'm almost sure of it. So then who is the VI? It's pretty obvious. (OK not 100%, but a very high chance of BC being the VI)
The question is rather should we lynch BC because of this or not? Should we get rid of BC now and give him his MSPaint, or ignore him and go on like nothing happened? (And maybe let the Mafia do the dirty job.)
|
4492 Posts
Wait a second. Who said there's only 1 insane DT in the game? Or am i missing something?
|
4492 Posts
BC, I'm curious to hear what you perceive me as now. Of course it will probably be irrelevant once you flip VI and get your picture, but I'd still like to hear it.
|
4492 Posts
On December 31 2008 12:54 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On December 31 2008 12:45 Mynock wrote:
BC, I'm curious to hear what you perceive me as now. Of course it will probably be irrelevant once you flip VI and get your picture, but I'd still like to hear it. Really haven't bother analyzing your previous gameplay. Your bandwagoning with ace, much like normal. But most people view him as a saint so i wont hold that against you. Show nested quote +Ace United States. December 31 2008 12:35.
you can't ever compare my playstyles in games to one another. I play different behind and the scenes than when I'm in public. So anything you try to do will be useless, especially since I play as a helpful townie even when I'm mafia. What are you smoking? Everytime your red you argue publically against being lynched(anyone would) but when you get called out you use skewed logic to favour yourself and then you drop down to saying how someone who was blue wouldnt play the DT role like that, then when you die you post some random curses or other bs. Behind the scenes you play the innocent townie to get intertwined and screw the town, as any intelligent mafia would. Its when you get called out your gameplay shifts. When your townie you rally to be the town voice, then treat anyone not blue or who agrees with you like trash so no, its a pretty accurate way to guide someone game by game. You may have more experience with the game, but that doesn't make everyone in it sheep who have to play the way you think they should. Stop ralleying behind your mafia buddy and let him die, at least this time you didnt get rolecalled first. Edit: added in a end quote tag.
You know what's funny tho? Every time I was rallied behind Ace is when both him and me were Town (we were only once Mafia together, last game, and yeah, you could see how that played out). I dunno, but from my point of view it says something about my perception rather than just blunt stabs and bandwagoning, don't you think?
Finally, whatever I say will always be based on the most solid logic known to me, rather than anything else. If I am Mafia I never feel the need to withhold sound advice from Town, as that's not in mí best interest either (because it would differ from my "usual" style). That is because I'm confident I can always gain Town's trust, and that is because NO MATTER what role I am, I will play it like a Townie, so it will be in Towns interest to listen to what I say.
Ad I can tell you this:
1) the VI has not identified himself yet.
2) You played your role extremely bluntly and based on very vague logic (how can you assume only 1 DT is insane? Yes I read your post, I just think it's completely unsound) if you really are a DT.
3) The best way for a DT to play is gather info until he can find a confirmed blue and then provide it all to the inner link. That, or use a mouthpiece as a minimum.
I put you on a VI, and want to tell youo that even if you get what you want, using the same strat as RoL did last time is pretty lame.
|
4492 Posts
Ah I was too late to set my master-plan in motion :/
Next game I'm playing under an alias.
|
4492 Posts
On January 03 2009 05:38 Caller wrote:
By the way, any mafia that attacks the meth dealer dies, suicide bomber or not.
mafia must assign hits, i.e.
Bob --> Tom
Jim --> Stan
If Tom is a meth dealer, Bob and Tom die. If Jim is a doc and is protecting Bob, both hits go through, but Jim dies too.
so if a suicide bomber attacks (not bombs) a meth dealer, both die.
but i dunno if it was bomb or attack this time around ^^
Of course it was a simple attack, there was no "Tarp!" picture added.
You're trying to screw around with our brains... And that's what we have Zombies for.
|
4492 Posts
On January 03 2009 05:49 Caller wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2009 05:47 Mynock wrote:On January 03 2009 05:38 Caller wrote:
By the way, any mafia that attacks the meth dealer dies, suicide bomber or not.
mafia must assign hits, i.e.
Bob --> Tom
Jim --> Stan
If Tom is a meth dealer, Bob and Tom die. If Jim is a doc and is protecting Bob, both hits go through, but Jim dies too.
so if a suicide bomber attacks (not bombs) a meth dealer, both die.
but i dunno if it was bomb or attack this time around ^^ Of course it was a simple attack, there was no "Tarp!" picture added. You're trying to screw around with our brains... And that's what we have Zombies for. you're dead stop talking ^_^
So are you, why are you still talking?? 
|
4492 Posts
On January 04 2009 01:27 Caller wrote:
Why fail? Santa was red.
|
4492 Posts
On January 04 2009 04:11 LTT wrote:
Look at how he was suspended...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://failblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/fail-owned-santa-dead-fail.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://philipscheel.net/facepalm.jpg)
