EPTAbout smurfs on TSL
| Forum Index > Razer TSL Forum |
|
aTnClouD
Italy2428 Posts
| ||
|
jingXD
United States283 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On March 30 2008 15:05 Plexa wrote: You must create an account with your known ID in it. Do not take this request lightly. If we find out you have been smurfing in any way, you will be disqualified. If you are worried about which ID you should use or whether this rule applies to you, ask Manifesto7 via private message. Since all accounts must be new, we recommend gamers use a TSL- tag with their name. Ex. TSL-Nony, TSL-FakeSteve. If you find someone else using your known name, PM Mani. If you feel that not smurfing gives you an unfair disadvantage, you must appeal to Mani. We will then give you a predetermined smurf name. Failure to do this will lead to disqualification. If you want to change names, you must inform us. No exceptions. | ||
|
aTnClouD
Italy2428 Posts
 actually I was debating with other TL players about this and it seems no one of us read that carefully. | ||
|
ATeddyBear
Canada2843 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/3817/kruemelmonsteryn0.gif) | ||
|
rANDY
United Kingdom748 Posts
On April 16 2008 09:24 ATeddyBear wrote: loooooooool | ||
Carnac
Germany / USA16648 Posts
| ||
|
Worked!
Canada264 Posts
| ||
|
JoMal
Trinidad/Tobago1177 Posts
| ||
|
Stegosaur
Netherlands1231 Posts
On April 16 2008 10:12 Worked! wrote: anyone who needs to smurf, = loser pussy oo; Some people get dodged based on reputation, people are afraid of losing points | ||
|
praetor.at
Austria92 Posts
 | ||
|
Coulthard
Greece3359 Posts
 | ||
|
Daveed
United States236 Posts
On April 16 2008 22:52 praetor.at wrote: according to this reasoning, mondragon should have been smurfing. yet he didn't, and he's doing well "some", not "all" people dodge. | ||
|
Asta
Germany3491 Posts
| ||
|
Xeln4g4
Italy1209 Posts
Some of the guys (i.e.:Cloud) also realized their replays to the community and this is a sign of transparency and fairplay. Allowing smurfs (except for excellent and proved reson) is not fairplay. In my opinion smurf shouldn't be allowed anymore in the future. An option might be creating a list of all the smurf, available for consulting to the first 100-200 players in the TSL-ladder ranking. But in general i think that we have already enough fake and hackers in this community and don't need more. Mondragon proved to anyone that if u are good, you don't need to HIDE. And he was maybe the only one with a decent reason to use a smurf (90% of the community watched tons of his replays!). If he doesn't need smurf, none need. | ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36401 Posts
| ||
|
Louder
United States2276 Posts
| ||
|
TheDarKo
Sweden109 Posts
![[image loading]](http://www.localarcade.com/arcade_art/data/thumbnails/2/smurf.jpg) | ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
On April 17 2008 01:43 Hot_Bid wrote: Everyone has the option of smurfing or not, so I don't see how it's unfair. Well, let's look at it from a logical perspective. 1) The condition for having a smurf is that it must be approved (means that a player should need/have a very valid reason for smurfing). 2) All the very top players (Mondragon, Draco, Testie) and really famous players too such as Nazgul, Eriador, and practically everyone, are using their real ID's. 3) Therefore, if all the top players are using their real ID's, and you can justifiably make the argument that every single player considered a "top player" can be found not smurfing the ladder, who could possibly have a valid reason to smurf ? 4) I would then conclude that because all the top players are using their real ID's, there really can't be a valid reason for anybody to use a smurf account. Then, you can look at why most top players smurf on ladders in the first place. 1) Their reputation might make it hard to get games, 2) they want to game without being distracted by people messaging them. (I believe these are the two most likely reasons). SO; since these are the reasons people smurf ladders, and it's already been established that anyone who would be significantly hampered by the above mentioned 1) and 2) are NOT smurfing... there really is no reason for ANYBODY to smurf on this ladder (or have valid reasons). The ONLY exception I can really think of that justifies a smurf is 1) Someone with a bad reputation of hacking / cheating, trying to play the ladder to redeem their name/play in peace. However, can you think of anyone that fits under this category? Mistrzzz and Haypro aren't smurfing and theyre the only names I could think of. Overall conclusion: I can't fathom anybody having a valid reason to smurf this ladder other than the top players (who aren't smurfing anyways). | ||
|
aTnClouD
Italy2428 Posts
| ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32278 Posts
On April 16 2008 09:24 ATeddyBear wrote: looooool | ||
| ||
