EPT/in
Tell me how you guys want me to play.
[N] Mafia Mafia Mafia Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
/in Tell me how you guys want me to play. | ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
| ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
On November 19 2017 01:16 Damdred wrote: ##lynch ve at twilight today On November 19 2017 05:32 Damdred wrote: First, confirmed town On November 19 2017 05:33 Damdred wrote: dammit just first on this page, oats is mafia though so life is easy On November 19 2017 05:41 Damdred wrote: Oats did make me laugh with his witty personity so dont think i want to lynch him today XD. My heart. Why so downcast? The ails of hopes deferred shall in time fade by a tree of life. Knowing so, you still ache as a woman before birth and a runner mid race. Lynch today I hear First town First mafia Lynch today I hear The response. Speaks more than the pain. The reaction lasts beyond the incident, thus is of more importance. It tells of the condition. The diagnosis is that we are not well. How will we address this sickness? That is of significance. I call for help to Him whom can. | ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
People trolling. People talking nonsense. Pretending their nonsense has meaning. Arguing on little, so the big is hidden in smoke. Yet here I am. Am I also a spewer if nonsense? Honesty is rare in these game if only coming by in a joking manner. Yet here I am. Hiding behind a persona. Knowing transparency would be my demise. Today is one of those days I question my ways. Prudent I have heard. Speaking plainly is not a well known option among the champions of these realms. Perhaps there is a way to play with honesty. I could always be truthful of that which I do not want to disclose. I could say my reads are confidential. My role is classified. I could play a defensive and honest game. I believe the telling of my reads will skew other town players thoughts and do not want to steer the town the wrong way unless I'm more confident. Of course, town will say no one is ever 100% confident in this game.... except for a few particular individuals who are even if they were wrong. Which begs the questions if they really were. If they had enough faith, could what they believe come to being? If it were just your faith alone, how would you explain being blindsided in life? This is where the positive thinking movements falls negative. Honesty... speaking of faith without a troll. Is speaking with troll cowardly on such subjects? To hide behind personas the same as masks? Is it the same when you let everyone know you're acting and pretending? Though some may retrospectively say they were joking when an offense was taken. This is not good. Deeper subjects is much more worthy of discussion to decide who to lynch than activity and grammar. The content and heart of the matter is more important. Let us stop looking merely at the outward appearance of paragraphs and color texts. So, we shall have a debate. The first topic is this: Shall we have a debate on a deep subject to determine who we shall lunch rather than rely on jokes and giggles? I will watch the debate and choose a winner. The response to the debate which is of a greater matter as spoken of earlier will be of surprise. Let's play mafia with deep debate. Try a new game of one of you had desires. Else you risk a game of bore. | ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
On November 19 2017 11:23 Conversion wrote: I don't see anything damdred has done that warrants him lynchable, so I don't really get anything from him You're allowed to dislike whatever you want, my friend. Honesty on the deeper matters. The last remark. How does that help with cconversion? Also, how long have you two been friends? | ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
On November 19 2017 11:23 Conversion wrote: surprised oats isn't calling people scum/bad left and right for once though Is this good, bad, or neutral? This surprise.. or do you even know? Are you just taking notes? | ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
On November 19 2017 11:17 Z-BosoN wrote: His lynch order doesn't really matter, but I am concerned he was a tad bit too defensive. Kinda felt like he felt pressured to come up with scum lists. Peaced out afterwards. KelsierSC is all passive and non-committal despite being fairly active, which I don't like, so I'm really interested to see how he will progress. Well, props to answering your own question. He did give a response to which you said nothing about. Do you agree with my dislike of his response? Does it ... tempt you? I see your questions and I question your questions. Do you love probing questions? Has this been successful in your mafia finding strategies in the past? | ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
On November 19 2017 09:27 Conversion wrote: why is Stan scum again? is this some sort of aggressive pressure to get some info? Has anyone notice the amount of questions this game? Do you think we should be questioning these questions? Does asking questions and answering questions with questions hide your true motives and draw attend to the question instead of the individual unless the question is about someone or the question is so questionable that it begs to question? | ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
On November 19 2017 07:31 KelsierSC wrote: Am I pretending to post to avoid posting? Are you questioning the questioner? | ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
On November 19 2017 12:01 Z-BosoN wrote: I do love probing questions. As to the success, I cannot testify, but I do presume it is better than sitting still. The questions do not distract anything else because there is nothing to distract from. Hopefully that answers your question and inspires newer, fresher ones. I heard of science that a question multiplies when answers are sought. Does the amount of questions correlate to answer seeking individuals? Are researchers more incline to question openly? What percentage are secret questions, which are kept in the minds of the questioner as they read the thread? | ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
On November 19 2017 11:58 Z-BosoN wrote: And so you've spoken. Let it be heard. Let us debate then, man of purpose. Until there are more people on the board, I favor a lynch of policy. Silence is an unwelcome demon, and should not be emphasized in this light. Though I am a bit curious. Explain please, to a simple mind, what the true meaning of the post you produced earlier. Are you expressing concern, since your reads must stay silent? Honesty. I have no reads. I was merely entertaining myself and others with my writing. Day 1 is a time of fun where everyone can laugh and play without too much punishment. I must agree on the silence. Some guys posted some statistics that showed increased discussion (number of posts by town in a day) correlated with increase town wins. Communication is vital. | ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
On November 19 2017 12:10 Z-BosoN wrote: While I did laugh at this, I would wager that you have already asked more questions than I. You also asked this pointless question after a very inspiring pep talk and multiple scoldings on the style I've brought to this game. I demand you answer my previous posts! I likes you. I believe I have right before reading this post. Carry on! | ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
| ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
On November 19 2017 12:28 Z-BosoN wrote: Just for curiosity, why is Rux on this list? I've strong town vibes from Chezinu unless his mafia is an evil best not spoken of. Rux is... ? Is this a meta read? As to his lynch order, it would be more relevant how he pursues it I'd say. Though I do want to understand why you and KeslierSC are at the top of his list. Seems kind of arbitrary. Whew.. deep content.. here we go! Honesty.. Some years back I played a game with a player with your username... On July 08 2013 23:42 Z-BosoN wrote: I don't want to lynch Chezinu atm. We don't know exactly the mechanics of his nuke and he's sticking his head out drawing attention to himself pretty hard, early in the game. I'm not familiar with his playstyle, but scum generally don't do this. You defended me. I was mafia that game and won with oats. I think you should know these things if you didn't recall or saw the endgame. Honesty. Activity and attention seeking is not alignment indicating for me. Reflects my busyness in RL more than anything. To know me, well.. I don't know.. search "Chezinu is Chezinu" in the search bar. I'm sure you will get plenty of results. Content. Contentment in the role we have and the activity levels of others. Honesty. I partially said the above to move from town to brown, so the mafia are less likely to kill me. Smart or wrong? Note to self: Make web association of likes. | ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
On November 20 2017 00:17 darthfoley wrote: @Oats and @Conversion, What are you thinking of this game so far? A decent amount of activity to base stuff off of Also would appreciate someone translating Petrov's posts cuz I have no idea where he's going with anything he says ooOOO! I can translate someone else! Ok, so stan was like reading the thread and didn't know what to do with Rux, a strange character he is. Then he started to hypothesize. If Rux is mafia, this Kel guy could be working with him cause of the vibes. But then something happened in the thread. A man of confidence called damdred showed up exclaiming Rux is town cause he is not so smart and thus is town by his not so smart tells. So stan was like, that.. Somewhat makes sense... But then the paranoia came. Too much somewhat sense it made. How can damdred be so confident? He must know.. Know because he is mafia!? But I myself am not completely confident. Suspicious enough to say something thought. So, Stan sought the opinion of bystanders to question his stance cause stan is a wise and prudent man who questions his ways. He is more confident that damdred is mafia than Kel, because Kel was based on Rux being mafia and that hypothesis isn't as stable. | ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
| ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
On November 20 2017 03:51 darthfoley wrote: Because it's D1 and I don't see the point of it Lol my Chez post was obviously not serious. His post was just hilarious. Your two reasons for scumreading me are really lazy Proverbs 26:18-19 " Like a maniac shooting flaming arrows of death is one who deceives their neighbor and says, “I was only joking!” " | ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
| ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
| ||
|
Chezinu
United States7466 Posts
| ||
| ||
