New Smurf Mini Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
GargamelxD
59 Posts
| ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
| ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
| ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
i am a pink unicorn and i cant speak sorry | ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
| ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
lynchbait will be lynch bait even behind a smurf going to figure out his alignment | ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
either way i think goldrom is VA and i want to kill him with fire ##Vote 77Goldrom | ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
expand on gargamel and rom are bad and then this post | ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
| ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
so i guess after realizing that im willing to vote both, and its not LS | ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
in rom you have a guy who apologizes for being late, claims his role, asks about the latest news and in the next post acts like he doesnt care. | ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
the player is town | ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
On February 12 2016 15:00 Wartrukk wrote: wait lol LS got modkilled, was the guy who was lying (and obviously LS) and ALSO VT I didn't really care about this game before and now I REALLY don't care hearing it from me was just as good as a modconfirmation, yams | ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
valdiano is hts and town imo. | ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
On February 12 2016 07:41 Wartrukk wrote: Scumtama and lying LS on the same wagon on a lurker. Wowie On February 13 2016 09:06 Wartrukk wrote: So on first read I hate gargamel and want him to be died. He quite obviously cares less about this game than I do and that's just fucked incompatibility detected | ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
| ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
i also have the sneaking suspicion that bh is in this game | ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
On February 14 2016 00:00 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: Gargamel i don't like how you are using very loose smurf hunting for reads. Wartrukks incompatibility: um between those two posts both those players died. You think he should have scum reads on flipped townies? he also said the rom wagon looked like shit, was that after his flip`? | ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
why are you failing to notice this nnn? theres the feeling you are biased towards wartrukk | ||
GargamelxD
59 Posts
On February 14 2016 03:59 keanuisgod wrote: I think I implicated suspicion on Wartuk on N1 far better than saitama. If the point of the NK was because of reads on a scum Warty, why not shoot me? Saitama's posts about Warty on N1: + Show Spoiler + On February 12 2016 10:20 saitamaofonepunch wrote: Wartrukk is scum. Lynch tomorrow. On February 12 2016 13:47 saitamaofonepunch wrote: My PoE says wartrukk and then garg. Barring that I'd have to say I am wrong and that's why I am so hesitant to give reads. On February 12 2016 15:26 saitamaofonepunch wrote: Your thinking I scumread you for omgus is like your having thought that with nnn Compare to what I posted about him on N1: + Show Spoiler + On February 12 2016 10:03 keanuisgod wrote: It's really nice to come back to activity 1-2 hours before the lynch and shout how the "wagon looks like trash" isn't it? It's also really nice to vote right at the last moment to someone who is OBVIOUSLY not getting lynched and making no effort to try to get him lynched It also isn't suspicious at all to vote someone completely unrelated to the lynch and wait until the last second (when you KNOW your vote doesn't count and thus you can't be held accountable for anything) by just saying "I have real reasons but am still busy" Anyways, we know Bhaal is town now, so please explain your read on him. These are your only posts about him Why exactly was he in your "leanscum" pile? What does the "lying LS" thing have to do with anything? Did you even pay attention to my case on him and the later change of heart of many people in the thread about him? Saitama said "Warty is scum based on PoE, but I may be wrong so I'm hesitant to give out reads". You think that is enough to implicate Warty? i just think it looks bad on you if you post reasons for being suspicious about warty in something that looks like a defense of him. for you the nk implication should be secondary since you already have arguments for being suspicious of him so why make the NK argument the center of your post here? it just doesnt seem to be in line with your apparent preferences. if you think the nk argument is bad you might as well think "doesnt matter i have other reasons to scumread him, i think they are better and heres why" which would have seemed like a more townie way of approaching this. kita or bh | ||
| ||