EPT[T] Cell (Mini?) Mafia III
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
DEBAC gone. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
smurfs are scum. Not really holyflare says this sometime: How about you vote me and so I can set the groups at D -> A -> C -> B -> E? Since my group will be the first, I literally cannot change the ordering without being lynched for lying. Easier to vote for me, don't you think? What in the world is this?? who lies about setting up the order????/ People that care this much are covering. Aka rikoty and apathy. among others. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Hes also really angry. Why are you so angry? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On August 29 2014 00:22 marvellosity wrote: Do we get any more of your wisdom, Oatsie? no | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On August 29 2014 00:47 marvellosity wrote: splendid. How do you like Amiko? haut | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
they actually arent but I made you look  Bleh amiko keeps talking about our cell being 3rd for whatever reason. Stuff like "we are active players so long filters lotta stuff to read", and, "day 3 is important cause at least we get one for town and not lose 3-0". Filler. Its pretty much useless. He seems really happy though. Amiko, are you a happy guy? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Also, is posting prewritten posts scummy or townie? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On August 29 2014 01:08 marvellosity wrote: What makes you think he's happy, cupcake? On August 28 2014 09:34 Amiko wrote: Ah okay I know who it is now  the korea should have tipped me off anyway hahaOn August 28 2014 09:40 Amiko wrote: @Holyflare: Do you have any comments on the content of this game? Or the thoughts I posted above? Since you wanted to talk about it On August 28 2014 05:55 Amiko wrote: I really wanted Blazinghand and MysteryMeat1 to be in the same cell. >:D On August 28 2014 04:37 Amiko wrote:  What about you Marv? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On August 29 2014 01:08 Professor Apathy wrote: it's mostly just horribly stupid because it would most likely start a a giant discussion over nothing. That being said, if I'd do it now that I stated that, yes it would certainly be scummy because I realize that such a discussion would be hurting town for no reason. As for other people, depends on wether I think they're stupid or doing it on purpose. Whats the difference between stupid and on purpose and why is someone scummy or townie either way? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On August 29 2014 01:27 Professor Apathy wrote: Are you asking how to differentiate the two or are you really asking why I plan on treating someone who's doing things with ill intent differently than someone who's just know to be doing stupid things? Im asking whether you think someone that changes the publicly claimed order is scum. simple. not complex. Is anyone colorful at all in this game marv? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
You never explained how his pregame stand is town favored and how his in game stand is scum favored. You didn't do jack shit about showing how that contradiction makes him scum, just cherry picked something that 'looks' bad but actually isn't. Try harder for the mislynch please. Marv the last scum game I played was Palmers 9 player scum favored game. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
How is amiko attempting to get reads? He made up his mind already. With no conversation with any of the parties | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
His initial campaign push felt extremely fake and forced and he spends pretty much 1 page talking about the same thing over and over. He doesn't care about finding scum and instead, spends his time talking about whether it's marv or marv and other pointless things. Distracting people. There is literally nothing that he says about actually winning the game. Wrong ppriorities, fluff, wrong focus =scum. ##vote: batsnacks | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On August 29 2014 12:45 Amiko wrote: Everything you said here is pretty awful so I'll take a minute to address it-. It doesn't matter whether his pregame stance is townfavored and his ingame stance is scum favored. Pregame he said one strategy was the best, but ingame he proposes the opposite. I didn't say that made him scum, and I didn't vote for him. If you had read my next posts you'd see that I was looking at ritoky and batsnacks. It's something to bring up, see how BH responds, and then make reads accordingly. If you found that post worth commenting on, why don't you weigh in on the way that batsnacks / marvellosity / WaveofShadow / Apathy voted for BH and their explanation (or lack thereof)? Come on dude, Btw, the fact that the post I put above on Blazinghand is super obvious and also 2 of the first 4 posts of his filter makes me think that the people who were voting for him didn't read his filter at all. this post obviously means that you think its scummy and that hes scum. You are just avoiding taking a stand because its 'suspicious'. In fact, your pussyfooting around the lynch is really weird considering you appear to have made your decision and are just waiting for the right time and feel to vote. Or want to wait for a better candidate to appear. Again this. batsnacks, marvellosity, WaveofShadow, and Professor Apathy all voted for Blazinghand without really making an argument or noting the (what I think was fairly obvious) slip. Does this mean anything to you on their alignment? You think that the slip is a reason to vote for BH. Therefore the slip is scummy. You maintain the stance that you dont really know who is scum. Inconsistent. | ||
| ||
