EPTShowdown Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 30 2014 07:35 Vivax wrote: How sure are you that I'm mafia. About 5 sure | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Your posts. "speed round" in all caps etc etc | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 30 2014 07:39 Vivax wrote: Serious posts for a start and then avoid serious answers with a bullshit answer. Do you have the guts to meet me tomorrow, at noon? So are you saying what i said is wrong or a lie? This is a typical reversal statement to avoid the original statement. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 30 2014 07:42 Vivax wrote: I'm saying that you didn't give a satisfactory answer as to how sure you are about me being scum just based on my former reasoning. Do you have the guts? I think you're confusing guts with being retarded. You yourself agreed with my complaint about games degrading and not being analytical but the moment i start with analysis why do you try and sidetrack that instead of just refuting what i said and in fact avoiding any real analysis with some useless "do you have the guts question"? Very bad vivax | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 30 2014 07:54 kushm4sta wrote: um ok so first vivax is too tryhard, must be scum.. now vivax is sidetracking analysis? those seem like contradictory points. Furthermore I would not describe vivax's play as either of those things. No. Selectively picking out something and making it seem like it's different and then writing a longer paragraph than needed on it = try hard. Scummy. Vivax then sidetracks MY analysis on his post to a silly question which he would know there's only one real answer to. Scummy. Then he keeps talking about dueling me tomorrow instead of discussing why something is wrong ot right or why specifically he picked sloosh out of 3 people that posted similarly. Scummy. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 30 2014 07:56 Palmar wrote: afk If this is the whole night, lynch him. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 30 2014 08:02 kushm4sta wrote: vivax dont you think two scummy people should duel each other, rather than 1 scummy vs 1 townie? Ultimately the best thing but not sure if it's awful with 1 town 1 mafia either cz then people have to be analytical and you can spot the inconsistencies | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 30 2014 08:06 slOosh wrote: kush, give us your feels on Vivax & HolyFlare. You're the one that vivax was targeting i think it's best from you | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 30 2014 07:34 Holyflare wrote: Other joke posts/not caring posts from me and ritoky and you pick out sloosh who is doing the same thing and write a big paragraph explaining it. Reeks of too mafia try hard. Is this wrong? You even said i was doing the same thing as sloosh straight after so why did you only mention sloosh and not ritoky and me? Why the fluffy way of phrasing how what he did was bad for town? Why is it so hard to get an answer out of you instead of repetitive questions back at me? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 30 2014 08:09 kushm4sta wrote: HF, i like the reasons why you are calling vivax scum, but I don't think those reasons apply to vivax. It scares me about your alignment because it's like you know what makes someone scummy but you are misapplying it. Set up talk is bad? I'd say it's not alignment indicative usually, but I think there is an optimal way to play this setup and if discussion can bring us towards that, it is productive and protown. How do those 2 go together? If you like the reasons then surely that means they are accurate and not misapplied? Why do they not apply to vivax? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 30 2014 08:16 Vivax wrote: It's pretty simple to explain actually, he thinks you're using sound reason to scumread somebody, but he doesn't think that those reasons to me. Further explanation doesn't seem necessary since in theory you should be more capable of understand english than me. Thanks for answering for another player. Why are you not disagreeing with this quote then seeing as apparently everything I've said is a misrepresentation and wrong but instead answering his intentions? Why does it not apply to you? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 30 2014 08:14 Vivax wrote: I picked SlOosh's post cause it interfered with my intent and was after all, a post that might or might not tell me he's scumreading me. It was one of those posts that have the potential to cause chaos while you try to get a productive discussion going, and people making those posts can say it was meant seriously or as a joke afterwards, whatever they prefer and is most comfortable for them in the moment they have to explain it. Didn't see this but whatever. Got my eye on you. | ||
| ||
