EPTOn January 29 2014 10:51 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
/in
/in
let's start!
[I][T][M] Vengeful Mini Mafia!
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
let's start! | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 03 2014 15:11 yamato77 wrote: Disregard earlier PMs, we will be rerolling the roles. what.... whattttttt.... | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:02 iamperfection wrote: Who else is town? That's a terrible question, we want to know who ISN'T town. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
always lynch the people that claim mafia, you've played enough voice to know that's at least 80% correct! ##vote artanis | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:14 iamperfection wrote: But if your saying he knows this why would he do it? because it's a scum default mindset! they think we know they always do it so they do it again to bluff but really, they're always scum! Artanis also claims jester exclusively as town. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:17 marvellosity wrote: Lynch all liars? In that case you are either telling the truth with your mafia claim and we should lynch you Or you are lying, and we should lynch you because of your own policy well done you. SNAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP. Well that's gg. -1 scum down | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:19 WaveofShadow wrote: So close. I was so damn close, and then reroll. Anyway, ##vote: marv 'cause policy. We can't have someone of your apparent unlynchability running around these parts so it will be my job to draw any and all attention to you as necessary. artanis already claimed scum | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:21 iamperfection wrote: Are you being serious holy? of course not | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:23 WaveofShadow wrote: Also I'd be totally in favour of lynching scumclainers. There does seem to be some truth to holy's 'case,k though the only examle I can think of was ## maybe? Ill look when I'm not on my phone. I don't get it? There's some truth to my case but you can only think of 1 example? Those 2 things are contradicting statements. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:33 iamperfection wrote: Wait lynched people don't flip that seems backwards it's not, however, there are a few simple solutions to this that we can do! 1. Whoever we lynch we tell them who to shoot. That way if the person follows with our consensus then they are most likely town. If they don't then you can most likely attribute the shot to scum. This option allows a scum to hide by shooting a towny though. 2.We lynch our 2nd top scum suspect and then get him to shoot our first top scum suspect thus revealing a flip on our intended target. I'm sure there are other ways just those are the 2 we have tended to use on voice | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:38 Artanis[Xp] wrote: What's the difference between 1 and 2? In 1 we don't get to see the alignment of our top suspect and things could fuck up because he wouldn't flip and if we tell him to shoot someone who is town he would do it as scum anyway. In number 2 we can get our suspect shot and revealed while proving if the 2nd suspect is also town or scum while doing it. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:43 Artanis[Xp] wrote: But aren't they both just the same option with the only difference being that in option 2 we're going with our second strongest scumspect instead of our strongest? It's the same strategy, just a different lynch target. .......................thereby a different strategy............? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:51 DarthPunk wrote: I have to admit. The VERY first thing I thought of when I heard you were playing was just shooting you for the fun of it. Now, compare this with every first post in games where he has been scum. On October 04 2012 10:12 DarthPunk wrote: LOL. Just read the day post. ##Vote: Marvellosity On September 04 2012 08:44 DarthPunk wrote: Things seem to have progressed quickly. I thought I would post to let you guys know I had popped into the thread. I look forward to playing with you all. (especially my XXIV alum.) On July 27 2012 09:25 DarthPunk wrote: Hi Guys! Very excited to finally be playing. I slept in, so at the moment it is ~10:20 my time which is AEST if you ever want to check. The deadlines are at 6am my time so I will probably be inactive for a few hours after each and before because I will be asleep. Depending on the situation beforehand I can/will stay up for them but I really don't want that to be a regular thing. OK now that is out of the way I am going to go back and actually read what has happened in the thread since I went to sleep LOL. GLHF <3<3<3. On November 01 2012 12:16 DarthPunk wrote: Sup Guys. Just caught up with the thread. So I have a town read on Kush, Unless he has put a great deal of effort into shifting his meta he is playing his town meta this game. So unless something drastic changes I guess that this is the first time I will not be gunning for you buddy. ^_^ If you are a miller you should claim. But I will be wary of such a claim as there have been times in the past in which an uncontested miller claim day one has sealed the win for scum. So we should exercise our judgement on such claims rather than put blind faith on their townieness. From my first read through Release is looking suspicious. Firstly he is tunnelling townie kush, although he may be unaware of kush's meta he has a scum read over something which is at worst a null tell. Secondly his posting feels off somehow this post in particular is scummy as shit. So after acknowledging that this post is a distraction from the suspicions on himself he attempts to create a tangent discussion on policy. And he proposes a lynch all liars policy that he talks about for a good deal and then decides he is against? It was fluffy and served to distract the thread from pursuing him. Claiming that you are not doing that does not cause it to be untrue, rather it speaks as if he was guilty of doing EXACTLY THAT. On June 21 2013 12:54 DarthPunk wrote: LOL you guys are so silly. Only person I would want to lynch is oats for wanting to lynch cora. On March 14 2013 23:23 DarthPunk wrote: Hi Guys <3 I haven't read the thread at all so I am going to go start doing that. The meta evidence is incredibly overwhelming, look at the super similarities between each opening post and this one here! Conclusive evidence that DP is in fact playing to his scum meta. ##Unvote ##Vote DarthPunk + Show Spoiler + you don't even need to check his town game openers, that would just be overkill at this point | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 09:08 DarthPunk wrote: I am going to assume you are trying to troll me holyflare because you are pushing all my buttons right now. Troll...? No? I quite clearly meta'd you and you are playing identically to your scum meta. Now, shoot artanis the other claimed scum when you die. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:29 Holyflare wrote: I don't get it? There's some truth to my case but you can only think of 1 example? Those 2 things are contradicting statements. Wave I still want you to address this. | ||
| ||
