EPTWill be active for sure this time
TL Mafia LXIV: The Restart
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
Will be active for sure this time | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On January 14 2014 13:20 thrawn2112 wrote: Town Butcher You are a regular townie, however your occupation leaves you with bloodstained hands each night so you show up red to detective checks. You are not self-aware Wanted to nerf town? Its likely cause I raged about self aware millers to him in pms. There is no reason for a miller to be self aware as it removes the purpose of the role -_- | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On January 14 2014 13:48 bumatlarge wrote: psh you have to see your alignment before you know that  haha alignment had nothing to do with it. I had just made a ton of plans all at once. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
Dont vote for VE or BH. Both clearly cannot be trusted in power. Look at the last few games of bh performances (you know that guy isnt strong enough to lead). As for VE, experience dictates hes too easily manipulated in PM style games. Neither of them would make good choices to lead our town. Instead we should be voting for someone far more reliable. Vote for me, the majestically powerful BC. I, if elected, will shank GGtemplar for being insanely scum. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On January 27 2014 02:29 VisceraEyes wrote: BC I may agree with you with regard to GGTemplar, but I want to hear your reasoning for thinking he's scum. I also think that BH is scum for a specific, PM related reason that I'm not willing to share with the group, but I will say that he's not floating my boat in the thread either. active blue hunting while not posting a ton of contributions. His support of kush early is just wtf in my opinion as well and no sensible person would do. Also pope your post was clearly crafted as you said have all contributed quite a bit as well but something about these people’s early reasoning does not sit well with me. Maybe they’re scum hunting with their comments but the interactions just don’t scream town for me. I am just not particularly excited about what these people have to say. At the time of your post I had one post, made less than an hour before your post. Skanj had like 2 posts, and storr has like 4-5. None of us have contributed quite a bit. Its clearly a post made in retardation and it was crafted with next to no real thought behind it. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On January 27 2014 02:41 Oatsmaster wrote: oh god why are there so many pages full of incomprehensible scribblings??? ? ? BC are you scum? You seem like scum. scum? No, I found the fuckup in your giant post. There is no way that in one post from two players you can claim we both posted quite a lot. Simple straight up fact. You clearly had a list of people that you divided into different categories with bullshit justifications. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On January 27 2014 02:41 Skanjab1s wrote: I like you BC, lets be friends. But, ohwait, why did you make that lovely campaign post but then not vote for yourself? Why would you do that to me BC Why Why would I need to auto vote myself? If the thread wants me as mayor they should vote me in, plain and simple. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On January 27 2014 03:41 QuantumPope wrote: I generalized to be concise. Long posts that doesn't seem to say anything, for instance the one I am quoting, doesn't really do anything for town. I could write a 2000 word post going into specifics of various individuals in the thread but I find it posts like that only hinder town. Your personal attacks on my character also seem to be unsubstantiated so I'd love for you could please elaborate on the following: I don't see the problem with supporting kush? I happen to be a very sensible person but if you could happen to enlighten me as to why this is a bad read it would be greatly appreciated. You try to discredit my reads...with no counter argument and by calling me retarded. Want to elaborate? Your post was crafted. It was vague, included 0 reads. The "bad" people were listed with flawed reasoning that you had for placing them there, etc... You only provided "full" reads on your town reads when asked and they were shoddy. Also anyone who has experienced games with kush should know fully where I am coming from. Its no secret that he trolls a fuck ton and randomly vanishes or just does random shit. Getting a town read on him is fine, putting him in power is not. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On January 27 2014 04:13 QuantumPope wrote: I appreciate a post like this much more than your previous one. You lack of personal attacks and actually trying to give me a read is helpful instead of trying to play on my emotions. That post was to have town start speaking about my reads and have me explain them further. By doing this it allows town to gather information on why you pinged that person and shows interaction. You decided to personally attack me without trying to think why someone would post like that and read my scummy for it. You also seemed to be grasping at straws when I felt like I gave good arguments to my reasoning. If you are into specific reads so much why have given none and been tunneling on my posting style instead of asking questions to have me elaborate? Especially if you don't like some of those reads. As for kush: I have never supported him. I'm trying to see where you got that?I'll let this first day let me get a better read and I have taken your words into consideration but my read on him has not changed. He is not being town read, nor is he someone I want in power. Overall I think I've defeated a lot of the pressure brought towards me but I'd love to see what more people think of my reads. I thought it would be the best way to get my reads out early on in a quick and easy way. As to questioning other people's reads I tend to like that play but I found it too aggressive for my liking. playing to ones emotions typically gets far more informative answers | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On January 27 2014 05:22 Blazinghand wrote: you could even argue that a vet is the worst choice since a vet will look town regardless of alignment Prettty sure I have been seen fairly easily as scum in recent times. I dont tend to fool people past day 3 when im scum. Usually not even that long. Also I am loving the people stepping out to try and prevent me from being elected. Also I haven't stated who I will 100% lynch. You know why? Because not even 24 hours has passed in this game. Committing to a lynch with that little information is something no player should ever be doing at this stage. Give it another 12-18 hours and sure. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
Vet bias is silly. If someone is experienced, you trust that they are capable of doing what is required you support them. If a rookie is making a shite ton more sense than the vet and they get the support thats where it lands. But at the end of the day it comes down to the posts. Trying to undermine someones support on a faulty basis is just silly. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On January 27 2014 06:22 Skanjab1s wrote: I don't think it's necessarily scummy to bluehunt in PM's. It's something scum COULD do, but town could do it just the same, and with many different motives. It's not very indicative in my opinion. Town has no reason to bluehunt. If someone claims to you thats one thing, but purposely trying to out roles is fucking retarded as town. People just leaking who has what role to just anyone happens all the damn time in pm games. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On January 27 2014 06:45 GGTeMpLaR wrote: I didn't really have huge expectations that many people would instantly trust me and answer but it didn't hurt to try though, that is unless everyone reads me scum for trying. Dude if you were confirmed town looking for blue claims I wouldn't care. Cause hey confirmed town, makes sense. However to start a game with "are you vanilla or do you have a role" is retardedly fishy. The sad fact is people are dumb enough to answer that claim, or lie to you completely and make you believe shit just cause they dont trust you or cause they are scum. Your action while potentially having a good outcome if you are town, the way you went about it is fishy as fuck. The fact you haven't really backed down from that though makes me think your just misguided town. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
I still dislike pope Mocsta has things to answer to BH has a things to answer to | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On January 27 2014 07:38 kushm4sta wrote: i guess mocsta fake claimed mason with alaka in the thread theres more to it than that actually. | ||
| ||
