EPT[M][N] "SMB" Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
and then we all live in blissful peace and harmony | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
(1) Do you prefer to play as town or scum? (2) What will you be remembered for this game? (3) How do you react to pressure? (4) Is your play usually emotional, or reserved? Joke answers = Totally scum, by the way. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Answer my questions if you want me to answer yours. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 16 2014 16:41 Oatsmaster wrote: twe3k pls why do you do this??? Thrawn, when did you reread this 10 page thread? And what exactly makes Rayn the scummiest guy in the room? Sno is the scummiest to me at the moment. This is what I've found after a read-through of his filter: - His "let's lynch the host" thing, while being a joke, shows a deep lack of desire for actually wanting to find scum. On January 16 2014 09:27 Sn0_Man wrote: Its my first mafia game in monthsssssss PS since when does kush do like reads and shit 15 mins into a mafia game? - His non-committal OMGUS onto kush's light accusations is scummy. He attempts to discredit kush to undermine is argument and divert the attention onto his accuser, which is inherently scummy. On January 16 2014 10:21 Sn0_Man wrote: What how come this never happens in my games? I don't think i've ever lynched scum day 1... Subtly playing the 'inability' card. - His contributions are all incredibly tentative, careful comments that make sure to not outright accuse anyone. He doesn't push/question people, nor does he come to any conclusions in these posts: On January 16 2014 12:12 Sn0_Man wrote: "How to pressure; A guide by Hopeless" 1) Vote ur target 2) Tell them to post seals and abandon thread 3) Flame their play + Show Spoiler [1] + + Show Spoiler [2] + On January 16 2014 11:30 Hopeless1der wrote: this is the part where you post seals and peace out of the thread grack + Show Spoiler [3] + On January 16 2014 11:37 Hopeless1der wrote: because you've self voted and followed up with complete nonsense for no discernible purpose than to make noise. No need for much else  On January 16 2014 10:25 Sn0_Man wrote: I dunno it sounds incredibly stupid to waltz into a thread as scum and blatantly announce that you are lurking and avoiding contributing. Admittedly, still stupid to do as town, but less so. ##vote: Sn0_Man | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 16 2014 17:12 thrawn2112 wrote: Hey Skanjab1s, why are you being silent for all of this? Hey hey I was away way. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 16 2014 18:07 thrawn2112 wrote: What do you think about Oats and Thrawn I think you're almost certainly town, and I'm leaning slightly town on Oats, too. Your interactions feel like town-on-town. What do you think of Sn0? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 16 2014 18:09 Koshi wrote: Mr. Evil Snowman so scummy. Why are you not trolling with Grack Skanjab1s? I'm too busy finding scum. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 16 2014 18:20 thrawn2112 wrote: ##unvote I think what you said here: "- His "let's lynch the host" thing, while being a joke, shows a deep lack of desire for actually wanting to find scum. " is quite possibly the scummiest thing in the thread. A "deep lack of desire," are you serious? That reeks of exaggeration and propaganda based writing. It felt scummy to me, so I put it in the case. And yes, a lack of desire to find scum is, believe it or not, present in scum. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 16 2014 18:44 thrawn2112 wrote: Apart from what I pointed out, what irks me the most about skan's case is that it looks exactly like a scum's "I'm going to read this filter and point out every single 'scumtell' I can" type of case. I don't see any thought process behind the case, it all looks very robotic. (scum going through the motions of writing a case) Nowhere in the case does he stop to consider reasons why sn0man might be town, which is something that townies generally do even if they are experiencing confirmation bias. He obviously read sn0's filter knowing that he wanted to scum-read sn0_man, and wrote a bunch of exxaggerated propaganda to prove his point. That's the way I write cases, I filter people and point out all the scummy things I think they've done. Obviously I don't stop to consider reasons in my case of why snoman might be town. That's not what a case is. A case on why someone is scum is a compilation of their scumminess. Also, I got scum feels from sno's posts, so I filtered him and made the case. It's not that I wanted to scumread him, it's that I already have scumread him. If you believe that the points in my case are "exaggerated propaganda" then please explain how. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Yes, and I still find the things he has done to be quite scummy. Could you please stop ignoring my questions thrawn? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Even though you're halfway across the world and asleep, I hope you feel it, thrawn. I hope you feeeeeeel it. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 16 2014 21:06 raynpelikoneet wrote: Why is that? There is only one answer to that question. No there isn't, there are an infinite number of legit answers to it that are helpful, but anyway this is irrelevant | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 16 2014 23:03 raynpelikoneet wrote: The case is not a case. It's a couple of posts and made up reasons why they are scummy. This doesn't even mean anything, all cases are just posts? And the reasons why he is scummy are entirely legit. Which reasons do you think are "made up"? On January 16 2014 23:05 raynpelikoneet wrote: Also Skanjab1s seems to be deliberately choosing which posts to respond to and which posts not to. Bullshit. I've responded to every single post directed at me. This is a blatant lie. On January 16 2014 23:14 Hopeless1der wrote: skanjab what was the first thing about sn0 that tipped you off that he was totes scum? rayn, any thoughts on grack? It was partly the feels that his "lynch the host" joke gave me, but mainly it was his reaction to kush's accusations that made me think he's scum, and warranted a filter dive. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 16 2014 22:02 Koshi wrote: I hope it is relevant. Otherwise why you ask those questions? I was referring to the arguing about the questions, not the questions themselves. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 16 2014 23:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: Skanjab1s, expand on your case. Tell me why what Sn0 has done is more likely to come from scum than from a townie. That's not clearly seen from your case, why do those things you pointed out come from scum and not from town? Also there is only one important question to you. It's about your questionnaire, which was bad. Sooner or later you need to explain why you decided to do a bad questionnaire which can't possibly help you find mafia. Under that little pressure, (all kush said was "sn0s fluff seems awkward") I don't think town would react in this way. Town is more likely to either (1) Ignore it, (2) ask for elaborations, or (3) omgus aggressively, depending on how the person plays. What Sn0 did was omgus very carefully, in a way that doesn't pressure or question kush, and doesn't help sn0 find out anything about kush's alignment. For the first quote, and the rest of them: The purpose of these posts is not to find scum, but rather, to just mildly paint a person as scummy by throwing out small accusations. That is why these things come from scum and not town. You said I will eventually have to explain what I wanted to find with the questions, which I will do, I'm not going to do that now, as not everyone has answered them. Also, the questionnaire wasn't bad at all, and it can definitely help me find mafia, just because you aren't able to see how doesn't make it bad. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 17 2014 00:06 Hopeless1der wrote: your questionnaire was stupid and a waste of time both to post and respond to. You're stupid and a waste of time both to post and respond to. On January 17 2014 00:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: For someone who has Sn0 as this top suspect and has read Sn0's posts carefully this accusation should not be possible: Like this is what Sn0 says: If someone consideres this as "incredibly tentative, careful comment" then i don't know what to say. So, i stand by my words that Skanjab1s is just making shit up. Literally every one that I quoted was tentative and careful, I wasn't calling that tentative and careful, hence why it wasn't included in the case, dear. What do you think of Hopeless, rayn? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 17 2014 00:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: But you were, because you said all of his contributions.... Why are you changing your story? I don't have a read on Hopeless yet. All of his contributions that I quoted. My story isn't changing at all. | ||
| ||
