Really Small Mafia

On January 10 2014 06:26 Giggletummy wrote:
I don't like that artanis is content to just play dog. There's no real rush on the day, but whereas you messed around and tried to get other people to mess around (townie), artanis is content to do nothing more than mess around. I don't count the non-me bark as not messing around. He also has 2 brackets in his name, and we have 2 scum.

On January 10 2014 02:16 Derrida wrote:
No idea what's going on at the moment.

On January 10 2014 05:09 Derrida wrote:
^ Agreed, I am disliking this amount of fluff. We need to get back to reads. What do you guys think about Artanis playing along with the Scooby Doo scheme?

On January 10 2014 12:56 Derrida wrote:
I am town you noobs, unvote me.

On January 10 2014 15:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I have read.
##Vote: GGTeMpLaR

Derrida is a pretty pretty town. Holyflare most likely town for realising it.

On January 10 2014 16:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I'm pretty sure you're not.
p.r.e.t.t.y counter has reached 4.

On January 10 2014 16:27 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Why i think GGTeMpLaR is mafia:

These posts:



First of all, he is accusing Holyflare of promoting shitting up the thread. This is a completely inaccurate accusation. Holyflare's intentions are still unclear, so him doing what he did is a null-tell.

Second, nobody is forced to play along with Holyflare's Scooby-doo game if they do not want to. But GGTeMpLaR himself enters the van. He is himself promoting the "shitting up the thread" that Holyflare can't possibly stop because Holyflare is not responsible for other people's actions.

- GGTeMpLaR calls Holyflare scummy for shitting up the thread -> but the joins the shitting up the thread instead of stopping him.
- GGTeMpLaR says Holyflare is responsible for shitting up the thread when nobody is forced to play the game. If someone is responsible for shitting up the thread it's all the people who +1 Holyflare's game, not Holyflare.
- Both of above are incorrect logic and looks like GGTeMpLaR is just trying to find an easy target rather than find people's motives behind their actions.

On January 10 2014 16:53 Holyflare wrote:
Also the fact that he quite literally stated:



that I am his "scum tell" (odd choice of words???) but then within the NEXT POST has contradicted himself to say that:



all the posts and actions done by myself so far are in fact a "null tell", this was before I had even posted half of what I had posted now!!! However, he completely drops off of me and I'm now actually a townie



because I ignored him and continued to spam... All in the meanwhile he has made a semi-case on Derrridadadada the total towny+++ and voted him without discussing with his vote target or anyone else in an IML game. Unacceptable!




I hesitate to vote right now (do we even have a time limit in this game..?) because the quest to save scooby doo MUST be completed.

On January 10 2014 17:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So you first thought Holyflare was posting fluff (when you didn't even know his intentions behind his post about the minigame), then you called him scummy for it, and then you joined the minigame which gives him a "permission" to continue this scummy behavior. That is townie exactly how?

If you thought his posts are fluff and he is mafia trying to hide behind shitposting why did you not tell him to cut the crap instead on +1'ing his crap?

Also who is your top scumread and why?

On January 10 2014 17:12 GGTeMpLaR wrote:


First, I made an educated guess about his intentions when I scumread him. Under the assumption that HolyFlare is scum, I think my guess about his intentions made perfect sense.

Second, I pointed out before I don't care if people are going to troll as long as they are going to give concrete reads and play the game as well (hence why I actually approved of Artanis even though he was acting like a dog - he gave a solid scumread that lined up with my thoughts and quoted the same post I had issue with, even going so far as bolding the significant portion of the quote). My entering the van was not fluff or spam, it was a little "ok, I'll humor you if you insist on this" under the main body of my accusation and explanation of my read. I tried to meet him halfway by tossing him a bone in the hopes that he would give something concrete.

I never accused HolyFlare for posts he didn't make or said he was solely responsible for shitting up the thread. Over half the game was making null-read troll posts that filled the thread with filler. I accused HolyFlare for assuming he was a townie looking for clues when all he was doing was asking other people to "look for clues" without giving any actual reads himself. If you call what I was doing "shitting up the thread" then I don't know how to play this game.

You're 100% wrong to say Holyflare isn't responsible. Anyone who posts fluff is responsible for themselves posting fluff. Other people were giving reads at least while trolling. HolyFlare literally didn't give a single read until we made him tired of writing scooby doo paragraphs.

I find your accusation of me and the logic behind it weak and I think you've entirely misrepresented a lot of what I said.

Also, I would still love to know how you have a town-read on Derrida when he hasn't even properly responded to the thread.

On January 10 2014 17:28 Holyflare wrote:
Also, templar, you are clearly not reading my posts if you are insinuating that I am making everyone else do all the work by "looking for clues". I AM SCOOBY DOO THE KIDNAPPED CHARACTER. Where do you think these clues are coming from? I post fluff and magically clues appear? No. That is clearly not the case.

Why don't you save scooby and velma instead for now.

On January 10 2014 17:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So you are basically accusing Derrida of the same thing you did?
Calling HF's minigame fluff and useless and then +1'ing it.