EPT/in :D
White Flag Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
/in :D | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
On October 24 2013 00:20 E00e wrote: /out On October 24 2013 00:30 Pandain wrote: /in Dammit, too slow. | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
| ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
I've gone and confused myself... | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
Excellent... excellent. | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
| ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
On November 01 2013 01:33 Oatsmaster wrote: I really dont like that vote from JJD. He seems to want to vote Hzflank because other people also think he is scummy, caring more about the appearance of the vote more than voting for scum, as well as incidental totally useless stuff like Would scum, knowingly voting for someone to look good, openly state that they're placing the vote because many others appear willing to do so? | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
On November 01 2013 02:30 Stutters695 wrote: What do you think of hzflank Fuba? Actually, I think I'm going to vote for him. He's talked quite a bit, but always ends with a noncommittal statement. He kind of narrates the thread, but doesn't give a conclusion. As far as his involvement in the rng debate, the apparent inconsistency in his position is the most concerning thing to me, though I'm not even sure there is one. I think rng-ing would be bad play, so advocating for it or opposing it are pretty null. I agree with jjd that he appears to be supporting it in one post, then the next one appears to be agreeing with the first. However, I guess it could be interpreted the way hzflank says he meant it, so overall that just makes me lean slight scum on him. Altogether, I feel pretty confident with a vote on hzflank. ##Vote: hzflank | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
On November 01 2013 09:51 hzflank wrote: This seems to have flown under the radar: You say that you are not sure whether the most concerning thing actually exists. You feel pretty confident with a vote on someone that you only lean slightly scum on. I would say that you decided on where to park your vote before you decided on the reasons for it. ##vote: mkfuba07 dat omgus On November 01 2013 03:09 mkfuba07 wrote: Actually, I think I'm going to vote for him. He's talked quite a bit, but always ends with a noncommittal statement. He kind of narrates the thread, but doesn't give a conclusion. As far as his involvement in the rng debate, the apparent inconsistency in his position is the most concerning thing to me, though I'm not even sure there is one. I think rng-ing would be bad play, so advocating for it or opposing it are pretty null. I agree with jjd that he appears to be supporting it in one post, then the next one appears to be agreeing with the first. However, I guess it could be interpreted the way hzflank says he meant it, so overall that just makes me lean slight scum on him. Altogether, I feel pretty confident with a vote on hzflank. ##Vote: hzflank My main issue with hzflank has always been that while he was posting a lot, he wasn't coming to conclusions. He was throwing accusatory statements around, then ending with the equivalent of "... but I don't know if he's scum or not." It gets suspicions out there but insulates him from the consequences of a mislynch. My entire second paragraph was there because I'd spent a bit of time thinking about the rng discussion, and came to the conclusion that it made me only lean slightly scum on him. I often get bitched out for my first posts not being related to the ongoing discussion, and didn't want to sidetrack the thread by not commenting on the silly rng discussion that took over up to that point. So long-story-short, my main reason for finding him scummy was that he was posting in a scummy manner, and my thoughts on him haven't changed a lot since then. | ||
| ||
