EPTAfter last game's anticlimactic ending I hope we put up a better showing.
Newbie Mini Mafia XLVIII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
After last game's anticlimactic ending I hope we put up a better showing. | ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
I'll be in and out through the night to check and see if we're gonna start today. | ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
| ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
Considering the game was supposed to start a few hours ago I think you're both being very hasty here. Wait and the scummy players will expose themselves. | ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
| ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
| ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
On September 25 2013 14:39 Jayte wrote: It's game time. Mafia, put your hands up now. Since he joined the game this is his sole contribution. Meh...not trying to contribute, just posting to say he posted. On September 25 2013 22:55 MLuneth wrote: Question: Can the town roleblocker block like a town vigilante / maf roleblocker roleblock maf? This is an odd question. Feels like someone trying to role call falsely in order to be above suspicion. Why not pm your coach or a mod? Mluneth's other post since joining + Show Spoiler + On September 25 2013 22:51 MLuneth wrote: Hey guys, let try and keep the jokes down a little, it just ends up clogging up the thread, something that just helps mafia. In terms of policy lynching a lurker on d1(and in general), I'm against it simply because it lets maf chill (as they know how we will act) rather then being on their toes and hopefully making mistakes that we can punish. As for my idea on on lurkers, I think pressure is key as there is really no reason for town to avoid discussion. Anyway, greetings from Australia  It's early but those are my impressions upon going through everyone's posts individually. | ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
As I said yesterday, I don't want to jump on people too quickly and start a band wagon. We don't know their time zones or when they're available to rebuttal. They're just two people to watch because their initial comments seemed a bit off to me. Mluneth's first post was very in-line with the conversation going on at the time. Still, his question was odd. | ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
| ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
I want to see Blurry participating more but until he does I'm assuming he's trying to fly under the radar as scum. He has 3.5 hours to redeem himself. | ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
His first post was good but not enough to give any read. I really hope he contributes something soon because his lack of participation is hurting the game and his chances of surviving the lynch. + Show Spoiler [playerboy345] + He's been active in trying to move discussion forward throughout the game. Feels okay to me for now. + Show Spoiler [heavenz] + heavenz willingness to question people's reads puts him out there more than he may want at this point if he was scum. Again, seems all right to keep around for now. He's contributing and trying to force slips out of people. + Show Spoiler [onlywonderboy] + owb I've read most of your LOL material. You can write and critically think. WHAT did you like about playerboy's analysis in particular? What are your opinions on the other twelve players in this game? I'm not liking the read I'm getting here. + Show Spoiler [stormtemplar] + stormtemplar is looking scummy to me. He writes a lot and yet says nothing. He's basically said he agrees zaragon might be town, he doesn't know about playerboy and death to all lurkers while telling others to contribute more to the thread. He's trying to misdirect and confuse discussion rather than forwarding it which I do not care for. + Show Spoiler [Zaragon] + Zaragon has been making similar reads to my own throughout the game and pushing for strong participation. He definitely feels more town than many others in the game. His willingness to focus on particular people could mean he's trying to get attention away from himself and the rest of the mafia but for now it's too early to say. I give him the benefit of the doubt. + Show Spoiler [Balla24] + Balla24 reads fairly town. He's been agreeing with heavenz and Zaragon whom I also like for the town. I could be getting fooled here and there are two mafia in their threesome. For now, there's better options to lynch though. + Show Spoiler [xIvanJ is useless] + One outta 13 aint too bad boys. Hopefully our replacement can play. + Show Spoiler [Jayte] + Could be lurking as a mafia. I just can't read him from the level of content he's put out. + Show Spoiler [MLuneth] + I want to call this guy scum from my gut. I really, really want to do it. But re-reading his posts just make me think he's a bit hasty and not scum at all. There are grammatical errors, shortened words and that half written post he managed to post. I dunno, he doesn't feel like mafia at this point in the game. + Show Spoiler [BajaBlood] + Hasn't said a lot. Could be leaning mafia, but he's okay for now. + Show Spoiler [bereft] + I know he said he'd be busy but why is no one mentioning his inactivity? Still, not the best candidate for a lynch. Okay here's my summation. Blurry, bereft (who did say he would be busy), Jayte and xIvanJ are inactive. I still think we should look for a better lynch candidate for today. I like zaragon, balla24 and heavenz contribution but I might be getting fooled because they seem to agree quite often. But hell, they're reasonable opinions. Time to see where people cast their votes. I've read through stormtemplar's posts multiple times now. He literally says nothing in them. Firstly, I hardly think the "Lurker topic" was irrelevant. It was the discussion starter and what was going on in the thread at the time. I hardly think you can throw that away as, rather undercutting your point about my lack of contribution. Clogging conversation after being accused of being scum. However, as to your point about me just joining Zaragon on playerboy, no, not at all. As a matter of fact, I'm not really feeling zaragon's read on him. I'm not getting solid town vibes out of him at all. He's contributed rather minimally. (7 of his posts are 1-2 lines with maybe a quote.) I disagree and he's just trying to change the focus away from himself. Until he puts up a better defense of himself #vote stormtemplar | ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
| ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
Currently xIvanJ, Blurry and Jayte all have one vote. I stand by the fact that voting them off TODAY is the correct decision. stormtemplar has shown scummy behavior and those three could still be town and contribute to the game. In three days I'm cool with voting them off if they're not active or they look like scum. But unless stormtemplar successfully defends himself in the next two hours I'm advocating that we lynch him. | ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
| ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
Also, yeah, it's better to talk about something irrelevant right now than it is to just not talk about anything at all. He said this on day one. Fine, good, we should be discussing something. But it seems like he's stuck with that logic throughout his entire posting history. If he is not scum he's definitely not helping the town out in any of his posts. He reiterates what other people have said, and says vaguely I agree or disagree. He makes no opinions of his own and kind of rambles about inactive players. I want to know what he really thinks or why I should feel otherwise. | ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
Is it possible to move future voting deadlines ahead two hours? I think quite a few people are at work during this time. I'm not familiar with the specifics on policies such as this one. Thanks. | ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
Myrzeth...I dunno he just plays oddly. | ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
| ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
| ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
##unvote ##Vote MLuneth | ||
| ||
