Gold Rush Micro Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
| ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On August 07 2013 14:34 Mocsta wrote: I believe this game is now full house I look forward to phagga as the low hanging fruit I'm so gonna go bananas on you. Also, this ain't nomination mafia. | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On August 07 2013 15:58 geript wrote: VT Time to insta claim folks why do you want to insta claim? | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
Why do you answer my question with a question? Seriously though, I don't see a reason to instaclaim until you have a decent plan that hinges on claiming. So far I'm not seeing how we benefit of giving out this information. Keep town on a need to know basis. | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
And now you're fishing for my role, nice. | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On August 07 2013 16:12 geript wrote: Here let me spell it out for you because apparently you missed the obvious logic of it: We get 3 unlynchable claims = no worse than 33% win chance We get 1 unlynchabl claim = no worse than 25% win chance, but really since every VT will be able to recognize that only 1 unlynchable claim and therefore limit his scum hunting to 1 of 3 people which gives us good odds to find scum instead of jester We get 2 unlynchable claims = it gets tricky I have a plan for this specifically but it doesn't work if I explain it. As you can see, every situation of claiming is pro town. Not one single bad option. Ok, I have my own thoughts on this for later, but I guess it's worth a try. I'm VT. Which obviously means that at least one of you two is lying. | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
| ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
Should not be that hard to understand. What I think about the plans might influence what other people claim, so I don't want to post it now. | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On August 07 2013 17:23 Mocsta wrote: Hi guys I was going to copy and paste a post from the town/scum guessing game that ibthought was town.. but then figured the best way to claim was as follows + Show Spoiler + this is not alignment indicative..as I have yet to read my role pm Lola I don't get what you want to say. | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
You're joking, right? | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
| ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On August 07 2013 17:38 Mocsta wrote: Hmmm reminds me a lot of palmars game with a jester and no time limit. We have 3 vt claims in geript.oats.phagga so far. clearly someone is lying already. I'm inclined to think phagga 1. He's phagga and. Playing too serious for early game 2. He's phagga and. Hence. The low hanging fruit 3. He's phagga You missed Hapas claim. And when have I ever not played seriously in the early game? I've been called out for being tryhard early game more than once. Ok, this is not what I expected to happen at all, although it makes sense for either not-town role to claim jester. What I'm more surprised is that the unlynchable did not claim yet. I suppose someone is holding back to draw out a fakeclaim? That did not really work though, as we have 4 claimed VTs and a jester now. Oats: Why are you so keen that I'd reveal my thoughts on the plan when geript was holding back on some explanation as well? | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
| ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On August 07 2013 18:24 Mocsta wrote: so I was actually calling u jester lol.... ima horny and green so... everyone has claimed, pls post ya logic Oh. I feel stupid now. basically there were some constellations that would confirm towns (3 claimed unlynchables / 2 claimed jesters / 1 claimed unlynchable), which is why I liked the idea of claiming, but I obviously could not say that back then. | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On August 07 2013 18:59 Mocsta wrote: so basically I held back from contributing to the thread to then spew rhetoric? hmmmm, j3stah, talk to me about the master of cereals do u think oats is town or scum? Uh what? Where did I say I'd hold back with contributing to the thread? I just said I did not want to publish my thoughts on geripts plan at that point, and it should be obvious why. regarding Oats, can't tell yet. I don't see anything alignement-indicative yet. What's your take on him? Also, what do you think of geripts plan? | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On August 07 2013 19:38 Mocsta wrote: (1) Well i find it ironic u held back, yet quoted something akin to Geript plan (2) Oats, hes typically spammy at start but usually has a purpose. I dunno .. from his limited posts so far I feel like hes trying to achieve nothing. Would like to see more from him. (3) I dont like the plan; mainly becuase I dont get it. What do u think of Geript plan? Considering u seem to agere with it?? can yoiu pleaes explain it to me. (1) Perhaps my post was just unclear? What I meant here is that I'm holding my thoughts on geripts plan back. Of course if I then later post them they look like geripts plan, because they are tied to his plan. Well, after he lined it out I thought the plan was ok. I was back then expecting the unlynchable to claim under any circumstance, although I see now why he doesn't (makes more sense to claim D2 if still alive). With that in mind, I expected the claims to give us some lead on who to lynch. At the same time I saw no real downside for town. Hence I thought the plan is worth trying out. Also, as I explained, I hoped that scum and/or jester might make a mistake with claiming, leading to confirmed townies. | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On August 07 2013 20:23 Oatsmaster wrote: 1) geript started it with a plan. within like 5 minutes of the game starting. I dunno, but I feel that its unlikely for scum to do that. 2) He had enough time to post 1 post. Its absolutely useless. I know no one claimed jester, I have no idea what phagga is saying about jester claiming jester or scum claiming jester. NO ONE WOULD DO THAT. Why? Because if you have 2 jesterclaims, you have to look scummier than the real jester. A bit difficult. And the jester will claim if scum claims jester I feel. So no one claims jester. In my usual early game eagerness I missunderstand Mocstas post as a jester claim, which it wasn't. My brain started to | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On August 07 2013 20:25 Oatsmaster wrote: Why were you adverse to claiming at the start phagga? Because I did not see any good reason in doing so. Why give out information if it doesn't benefit town? That's why I asked what geript had in mind. | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
- Only you and geript had claimed at that point. If I would think that geripts plan was harmful, I would still have had a chance to stop the other two from claiming. But it looks kinda stupid if I just claim VT and then tell the others they should not claim for whatever reason. | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
| ||
| ||