EPTTitanic Mini Mafia!
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Just to be sure, the veteran can practically not be lynched? If he has a majority on him at deadline it'll be like a no-lynch and he'll be confirmed town? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 26 2013 08:05 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: Veteran dies just like anyone else. I suppose I should fix the flavor on that one too. Thanks, flavor got me tripped up with the: night kill = throwing overboard = lynched ^^ Hi Mr Sparrow. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Yeah I'm a real partypooper The town vigi and scum kp are the only two kinds of nightkills and I can't really think of a scenario where the vigi does NOT want to see what his target flipped, meaning the vigi will want to send you the shot as late as possible.... which means scum want to do the same, which creates this weird and silly thing that shouldn't exist, right? What is the advantage in doing this over just having the janitor clean the scum kill that night. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 26 2013 21:12 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: The vig can shoot during day phase too btw Oh, right, "at any time". I suck, thanks for pointing that out | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Also Oats, why do you first define a lurker as the least amount of posts, and then define him as having the least content instead? On July 27 2013 10:01 Oatsmaster wrote: We should lynch the lurker with the least posts. Koshi is clearly not one of them. Clearly. So Paperscraps, why is Day 1 hard to get solid reads as opposed to other days? On July 27 2013 11:35 Oatsmaster wrote: There isnt a difference between lurking and not posting. There is a difference between high effort low post count and low effort low post count. You are aware of WHY people start day1 by claiming to policy lynch lurkers right? We want to force people to post and contribute so we can get a read on them. This doesn't mean we have to follow through on it but if town plays properly none of them will lurk which forces scum to post. It's just a statement you make and then you move on, so move on. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 27 2013 16:07 raynpelikoneet wrote: Clarity do you think Oats is mafia? No reason that I suspect him of being mafia over anyone else atm, no. On July 27 2013 16:23 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am just going to say that i'll be home in around ~10-12 hours so don't waste time on discussing my alignment before i start playing. Oats is most likely town and should be listened to. Enjoy your bday rayn. There's no way you could've left without a blanket statement like "x is town because I said so"? Pretty sure, from what I remember, oats opens every mafia game like this. Mr Firmtofu, why is exarezee looking town to you and why did you feel the need to share this with the class? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
##Vote FirmTofu | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 27 2013 19:11 hzflank wrote: After reading Tofu's filter I am going to have to decline at this point. He actually looks a lot more town in his filter than he does in the thread (or at least my read on him has changed after some rereads of his posts). To me it actually looks like Tofu is trying to open the game up for scum-hunters. I realize that your post is not serious, Clarity, however I would appreciate it if you could tell us if you actually have a reason for a wagon on Tofu. I'm not quite sure what that means. "looks a lot more town in his filter than he does in the thread"? Could you explain? Anyway, disagree completely with your conclusion which you reached a full 7 minutes after I asked (excluding when you actually read my post and made your own) _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ On July 27 2013 09:54 FirmTofu wrote: Yeah, I dunno what you guys are doing fluffing up the thread with fluff and general bullshit but It's be great if we could discuss the game now. FirmTofu would like us all to actually discuss the game, instead of all this fluff that's going on, like everyone talking about the lurker lynch policy! Granted, this post might have been in context with Koshi's 1,2,3 posts, but that was Koshi trying to prove a point. Firmtofu before this point however, did not discuss anything other than lurker lynch policy: + Show Spoiler + On July 27 2013 09:25 FirmTofu wrote: Okay, I'm back on a computer. This comes up every game. How scummy does someone have to be for you to want to lynch them over a lurker? You have to consider that lynching lurkers provides very little information whereas lynching scummy people might tell us a lot about how people are related to one another. On July 27 2013 09:40 FirmTofu wrote: To all of you that are out there... Do you think policy lynching a lurker day 1 is a good idea? Why or why not? On July 27 2013 09:41 FirmTofu wrote: Personally, I think we should use it as a last resort. Lynch a lurker only if 1) Half the town is lurking or 2) All the active people look genuinely helpful/useful and none of them look like good lynches. Shitting on town, regardless of if you're being a hypocrite or not, is something scum love doing. Then there is the useless vote with an easy out, classic scum: On July 27 2013 11:37 FirmTofu wrote: If you're going to wait, then I'm going to have to vote you until you do. ##Vote: exarezee You can't simply say you have scumreads and not explain them. "I am voting for you, and I will keep my vote on you until you do X!" This is not a vote to kill scum, this is a vote to have a vote on someone, and he backs off the moment his demands are met. On July 27 2013 13:31 FirmTofu wrote: ##Unvote I'm not sure that the case on paperscraps has much substance to it, but at least it's something. Not only does he back off the moment he's able to, he's also wishy-washy about the case itself. But the most troubling things I found were his last two posts: On July 27 2013 13:39 FirmTofu wrote: If I had to lynch someone right now, it would be CJS. All of his posts are filled with fluff and he has a random vote on Oats. I'm hating having to decipher all of his wordplay in his posting. Paperscraps would not be a bad lynch for similar reasons. I'm not as convinced as I am for CJS, but suspicion is still there. Right now, exarezee is looking pretty town. Notice how he explains that he's having a hard time reading CJS because of his roleplay, and Paperscraps would be a good lynch too because he's hard to read. That's all well and good, pressure them to be more easier to read, but the mindset is revealed in the part I bolded. He first claims that if he had to lynch someone it would be CJS or Paper because they're currently hard to read, but now he's suddenly saying he's suspicious that they're scum? why? Then he throws a random unsolicited townread into his post, because scum love giving townreads. On July 27 2013 13:41 FirmTofu wrote: I want to hear more from stutters and the people who haven't posted yet. For all we know, the entire mafia team could be in that group of people. This post is the epitome of useless. Instead of focusing on the information we do have, Firm decides to point out that there's no point in scumhunting because for all we know all the people who haven't posted are scum. FirmTofu is pretty likely scum and our best lynch right now. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
I don't believe 7 minutes is enough time to read a page of filter, make sure you understand the context, and reach a conclusion about the persons alignment. Given that you were so quick to respond and I disagreed with your conclusion I called you out on it, if you think that's scummy then call it scummy, if you think that's wrong then call it wrong, but don't say you "didn't like it" because that's just useless for everyone involved. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
There is even a giant ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ inbetween So... what association are you talking about? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 27 2013 20:19 hzflank wrote: The association between Tofu and I. There is no good reason to clutter your case on Tofu with shit against me unless you think there may be an association. The only time I (as town) have ever talked shit about one person in a case against another person is when I thought that they were both scum. I don't really understand what you're doing. I ask for people's opinion on Tofu cause people are being active and I'm working on a case. I get a reply from you saying you think he looks town. So after finishing my case, I quote you, and I say: I DISAGREE BECAUSE ____________ *CASE* Are you feeling attacked? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
You're saying that I, as scum, replied to you in the same post as my case on tofu so that you, as town, would feel enticed to defend tofu? Which accomplishes what? But then you're also saying that I, as scum, did that so that my case would be "less likely to attract votes"? Please explain what the thing is that "makes me look scummy" | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
I understand why you're not supposed to defend it, what baffles me is that you thought I was enticing you to do so. What baffles me more is that you're implying that I, as scum, would do something as innocent as have a reaction to a post AND a case in the same post, so as to entice you to defend someone, which would somehow work towards my scum win? Give our exchange a good long read, think it through, and tell me if you think I'm scum or town, because you've implied both. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 27 2013 21:42 Oatsmaster wrote: Would you lynch a lurker today? Seriously? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 27 2013 21:52 Oatsmaster wrote: What is this wagon crap man. Hmm wheres rayn? Read the thread, also try commenting on current stuff going on in the thread, like for example: What do you think of FirmTofu? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
| ||
