EPTPTP IV - Demon's Run
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
GreYMisT full of excuses. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On June 22 2013 05:10 deconduo wrote: We're balancing the roles right now, roles will go out and day will start once we're done. By which he means: We're busy randomly assigning a Batman and Joker role which can't possible be real to mess with you guys  | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
##Vote gonzaw | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
##Lovetap xxSK8rGUy277xx | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On June 22 2013 11:04 Acrofales wrote: I'm home! Haven't read anything yet, but after umpteen scumgames and a fairly longish break, I finally rolled town! Also, in case this plan hasn't been proposed yet, I think everybody should say what character they made the role for. That way, if someone claims, someone else can back that shit up, or act as a lie detector. Or the scum can pick off the players that created their roles and they are free to use it as they wish or modify it with a fake claim. That's silly. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On June 22 2013 11:18 Acrofales wrote: So what? That limits them in who they can kill. Restricting scum is a good thing. You scum yourself? lol it doesn't limit who the scum can kill. Scum can kill whoever they want, but with your plan, they're not shooting blind. I don't even understand how your plan makes sense. Why can't we server as lie detectors after the claim, without all sharing who we made the role for? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On June 22 2013 11:59 Acrofales wrote: Only way Kita is retarded enough to do this is that he is either in xxx's scumteam or made the lovetap role. Just throwing that out there. Oh, and ##vote Kitaman27 On June 23 2013 02:27 Acrofales wrote: As for who I have suspicions about? I've mentioned them in my filter. SnB: I expect more from him. WoS: for fumbling over the tryhard pants. Zephirdd: for being angry at people for not posting anything useful while not posting anything useful. Slight pings on my scumdar: Kurumi: for being D1 Kurumi BC: for being D1 BC and coming up with a pretty bogus artificial reason for being against my plan. Xatalos: for seeming insincere in his early tryhard posts. FOS Acro for claiming to believe that I'm either scum or the xxx role creator and then proceeding to leave me off his list of suspicions. Makes me question whether or not his reads or real. I also think enough people have shot down his bad role claim idea that he doesn't need to continue pushing it. He is sharing enough opinions though that I don't want to lynch him yet though. Does anyone remember off the top of their head what was the game where tnkted (?) had that role where he had to get people to respond to his ## power in the thread? I had thought it was PTP 1, but apparently not. I don't like skater or WoS lynches right now. ##Vote Austin I think austin would be a good person to consider right now. He commented on a role plan that had already been beaten to death and that's about it. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:48 Dandel Ion wrote: how do you know he doesn't have to post in the thread? Because he didn't? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:53 Dandel Ion wrote: you must have missed where he claimed the fake shot which may as well have been a requirement for the fake shot too bad it was fake If it's fake I revoke my town read because he's wasting our time by saying its real. On June 23 2013 05:53 Acrofales wrote: He posted that thing in bold about Jack the Ripper. But he also never did something like ##shoot skater. He said that he is not Jack the Ripper, so any role cop that returns jack on him means he is instantly dead. I don't think a scum BC would take an unnecessary risk by lying without any clear reward. We could also have the role creator of Jack the Ripper claim to confirm whether or not his role works like that, but that doesn't work in the case of a scum buddy who created the role of BC creating it himself. On June 23 2013 05:54 WaveofShadow wrote: I don't like this post, kita. You worry me. You don't consider the fact at all that he did this knowing that one of his scumteam created the role or something? The real reasoning behind what BC did with the little information we got is very easy to obfuscate and you only consider the towny implications. And as someone just mentioned, how do you know he didn't have to post what he did about jack the ripper in the thread? It's possible his scum buddy created the role, but any investigative check on BC that returns Jack the Ripper means he dies without question. I addressed the scum implications in the post, explaining that the target would be a poor use of an extremely powerful role like a scum day vig. I don't know that the Jack the Ripper statement wasn't the day vig trigger, but it lacks a target, unless you count the quote. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On June 22 2013 07:42 Dandel Ion wrote: Look at austin. He's a dog person. that must mean he's town. You howver are a cat person. JUSTIFY THIS BULLSHIT On June 23 2013 07:10 Dandel Ion wrote: :333333 DANDEL POSTING CAT FACES!!!! | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Catching up right now and will post my thoughts in a bit. | ||
| ||
