Fuck taking care of kids, listening to the podcast made me want to play. I'll find time.
RED Team's Prize
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
Fuck taking care of kids, listening to the podcast made me want to play. I'll find time. | ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
I have concluded that Grackaroni is scum. Please lynch him. ##Vote Grackaroni | ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
Yeah you have a funny hat and you're scum. | ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
On March 26 2013 10:58 Keirathi wrote: What is there to explain? He randomly voted for someone for no reason, so I did too. No you didn't, in fact this sentence cannot possibly be true, since the latter part "so I did too" implies that you voted based on my vote, and thus you have a reason, which contradicts your first sentence that claims there is no reason to either vote. | ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
1. Prove my innocence 2. Establish my reign 3. Get Grack lynched. 1. I am not scum because I am so nice and helpful and I am thinking so hard about this game please don't lynch me please I'm not scum really. 2. I am basically the mayor of this town, however, do feel free to add ##Vote Palmar for Mayor!! to your posts. It is not only a chance for you to celebrate my greatness, but also for me to see who my loyal citizens are. 3. Grackaroni is scum because of the observant and non-conclusive style of this post: On March 26 2013 09:31 Grackaroni wrote: Well I don't like Sinani including it in his reasoning for OO's question being scummy. he's using the fact that OO didn't read his role PM (which should be a null tell) to say that he thinks OO is scum. He seems to have absolutely no direction with this post, simply saying this for the sake of saying it without directly addressing either party. He's providing a summary with no conclusion of the situation, and specifically avoids talking to the players, just about them. And that's a wrap. Well played Palmar. | ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
Why isn't everyone sheeping me yet? | ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
DI is not surely town, but the reasoning brought up by the smurf is just not correct. There is a difference between DI's filter this game and the ones he brought up. In this game he's offering much more explanations than in the filters provided. Sure he spams a bit too, and he might be scum, having noticed that adding at least some value to the thread may be helpful. In fact DI is currently in the null territory for me. But that doesn't make smurf's case any less fabricated and untrue. The only common thing in DI's filter in both games are a few spammy one-liners but who cares? | ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
On March 26 2013 18:25 Oatsmaster wrote: Yeah ok so smurfs case is bad. Big deal. What do you think about SnB's case on prplhz then? I think it's a big deal and I'm going to ignore your other question. What I want to understand is why did he write a false case. Is it a mistake? Is it lack of effort? Is it a forced case because he needs to make it look like he's doing something? Smurf, get in here and be useful. | ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
On March 26 2013 21:01 Grackaroni wrote: Well your mostly just commenting on me... hypocrite! you're* Also how is that hypocritical? It's discriminative, but not hypocritical. | ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
On March 26 2013 21:07 Grackaroni wrote: Yeah I saw that but I didn't want to triple post You accuse me of not taking a stance in the thread BUT you only make one stance in the thread AND it's ON the person who hasn't taken a stance in the thread! Without me you've got no stance! but enough of this because it is pointless. Actually I also took a stance towards smurf's case on DI. | ||
| ||