RED Team's Prize

On March 22 2013 10:30 Hapahauli wrote:
I don't think you have to sit-out Moc. "The Game" doesn't follow the banlist.

Also...
/in

I'm overdue for a themed game.

Errr whoops busier this weekend than I thought.

On March 25 2013 04:07 InsertSmurfHere wrote:
/in

On March 25 2013 04:25 InsertSmurfHere wrote:
I highly doubt that all of the people in this town are going to want to policy lynch me just for smurfing.

Don't worry about who I am, worry about how I play. That's the point of this exercise anyway.

On March 26 2013 14:15 Hapahauli wrote:


What makes it scummy as opposed to a stupid townie thing?

On March 26 2013 14:43 Hapahauli wrote:

@ Oats

Explain your "random reads out of nowhere" plz. Especially Smurf.

On March 26 2013 14:54 Acrofales wrote:
However, if he DOES act as a townie, then worst-case, he is scum with a chance of bussing his buddies. I don't mind scum who bus their scumbuddies at all. They're my favourite kind of scum. They then get caught lategame, because they'll have to survive umpteen lynches all by themselves (and if he still hasn't read his role PM, then he has to survive without KP, making it all the easier to catch him)

On March 26 2013 15:13 Acrofales wrote:

USE YOUR BRAIN FOR ONCE. IN. A. MAFIA. GAME. EVER. PLEASE.

We lynch scum. We lynch another scum. We lynch another scum. KP stops. Golly, I wonder who could be the last scum? Maybe that dude who still hasn't read his role PM and therefore doesn't know he should be sending in nightly hits!

Also, if he does read his role PM in time to send in the NKs and you reach 2-1 lylo with someone who looked townie all game and someone who has looked townie, but claimed not to read his role PM, LYNCH THE FUCKING GUY WHO HASN'T READ HIS ROLE PM UNTIL LATE IN THE GAME.

If town has people left who failed to look properly townie alive after a minimum of 5 lynches, in which 3 scum were nailed, then I don't know what to tell you. Townies failed miserably.

On March 26 2013 17:50 Palmar wrote:
I'm ignoring the random spam of questions, but go read his case and then actually read DI's filter.

DI is not surely town, but the reasoning brought up by the smurf is just not correct. There is a difference between DI's filter this game and the ones he brought up. In this game he's offering much more explanations than in the filters provided. Sure he spams a bit too, and he might be scum, having noticed that adding at least some value to the thread may be helpful.

In fact DI is currently in the null territory for me. But that doesn't make smurf's case any less fabricated and untrue. The only common thing in DI's filter in both games are a few spammy one-liners but who cares?

On March 26 2013 18:45 Palmar wrote:


I think it's a big deal and I'm going to ignore your other question.

What I want to understand is why did he write a false case. Is it a mistake? Is it lack of effort? Is it a forced case because he needs to make it look like he's doing something?

Smurf, get in here and be useful.

On March 26 2013 21:17 Acrofales wrote:
Oats, you don't seem your normal talkative self. What's up?

On March 26 2013 09:38 strongandbig wrote:


I am so down with this



aww fuck

calling it right now prp/ryan scum team


this is stupid. dont be stupid.

Anyway ##vote: prplhz

- doesn't sound like normal town prplhz - he's proposing things to try and be helpful
- doesn't follow his own advice
- suspicious interactions with other players

yeah i'm totes down with this.

On March 26 2013 21:34 Dandel Ion wrote:

Absence of towntells is the biggest reason.
Well apart from one really minor one, but that's easy to fake and I already know he's at least rudimentarily aware of it, so I can't read much into that one, realistically.

He's also not doing shit.

And on top of that I looked into his soul and it's red. I drew a picture of that result, too. For TRANSPERANCY

On March 26 2013 21:38 Dandel Ion wrote:

I just said that my reads are serious.
I dunno why you think they are not serious.


I'd like to point to Personality, where I identified the dude as town ~halfway into d1 or so, when I replaced in.
So obviously, my towntells actually work.

On March 26 2013 21:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I have one problem with marv. He pressure voted me early on in the game. When i asked his what's up with the ninja vote, he posted this:

If he really thought i overreacted to prplhz why wouldn't he pressure me more? Was the "what's up with the ninja vote" somekinda secret townie answer i gave?

If i was marv and i thought someone overreacted to something and i was already pressuring him, i would definitely keep the pressure on to try to find more clues about their alignment. Here he just completely drops the issue and changes his vote to a policy target (which i do not see serving any purpose in finding mafia).

On March 26 2013 21:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Of course he is if we find out he is mafia. And even if this was true that's not a reason to give him a free pass to do anything he wants without questioning him until D2.

On March 26 2013 21:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:

No, my point is not a meta read. My point is i don't find how it makes sense from town PoV to do what marv did.
How is it useful to drop a vote on someone who will start contributing either way as the game goes on?

On March 26 2013 21:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes i propose marv starts playing and exlaining his actions.

I can't understand why people think it's not okay to question certain players because they apparently are some fucking mafia gods who can't be lynched on D1, but it's totally okay to drop "policy votes" on players you find to be less competant. Everyone has a same chance of being mafia based on odds itself and noone is above being questioned or being called out on D1. Simple.

On March 26 2013 22:49 Palmar wrote:


Marv hangs just like anyone else on day 1, if he is deserving of it. Stop with this retarded notion of not killing good players day 1. Kill scum day 1.