EPT+ Show Spoiler +
bugs will not modkill me
Fruity Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
has risk.nuke rolled scum yet? | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 14 2013 07:38 Zessionar wrote: ##vote: risk.nuke he has a 26,66 % chance to flip scum. kinda silly since tl town's dont random lynch | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 15 2013 00:54 Hopeless1der wrote: I voted for you because I find YOU suspicious, and I felt Vivax was going to jump all over me for not voting because he's pigheaded that way. + Show Spoiler + On February 15 2013 00:20 Vivax wrote: Show me these false accusations and exaggerated conclusions please. COMING RIGHT UP, SIR! On February 14 2013 21:28 Vivax wrote: If you look at the posting timeline between 09:17 and 11:03, Zessionar sticks out. Would you need explanation for what grush said? Is there a followup by Zess? Does this look like a useful question? No. Missing Response Here? (See spoiler) + Show Spoiler + On February 14 2013 11:00 WeWinMafia wrote: funny. And here I thought we already had some of those guys. Oh there it is Again, pointless question, no followup in front of obvious troll votes by grush and Oo. 2 questions while lurking in a 2 hour timeline, no generation of discussion whatsoever, no aggression, but looks serious about what he's doing. Zess posted at 09:17, not WWM. Inconsequential in the grand scheme except it was a driving point about how he had 2 hours to do things, and didn't do things. The timestamps are even in the post you quoted. You completely ignored the followup to grush. It wasn't terrific, but it was there, and to me looks more trolly than serious, contrary to your last sentence. Certainly, a difference in opinion, but when you willfully exclude information to suit your read, it looks scummy. I asked you to verify your standpoint by revisiting the filters you so haphazardly dove, and instead you've spit in my face. However, I know you can be an abrasive player. Which is why I went out of my way to point out that I know you'd already answered the question I asked. I still wanted it answered again. The lapse in you reading Zess as WWM's filter might explain why you were confused, instead of pushing a scummy read with no backing. Why would this worry you if your town? | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 15 2013 01:19 sandroba wrote: @laya hopeless looks quite townie to me so far, why focus on him with your overwhelming activity? i basically never post between 2:00am and 4pm GMT because i am asleep/doing work Hopeless1der jumps on zessionar immediately after zessionar says why he voted for risk and despite how aggressive he is in his attacks i don't feel like Hopeless1der justify's himself. It's as if he just wanted somebody to attack so he could get a vote down. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 15 2013 01:51 yamato77 wrote: Marv I would say looks quite town, yes. I don't know about risk, but the fact that he's looking at Zess is encouraging. I do think Zess is likely mafia at this point. His attempts at "scum hunting" are truly pathetic. In future could you less vague when you call someone scum? | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + I'm also ill and doing work TT | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
yamato is willing to call zessionar scum and vote for him but he continues to post without backing up his vote even when asked. ##vote yamato77 | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
He also jumps from "Zess being stupid with that vote" to "I do think Zess is likely mafia at this point. His attempts at "scum hunting" are truly pathetic. + Show Spoiler + On February 15 2013 00:33 yamato77 wrote: I've never seen syllo and sandro in the game at the same time, yet I'm supposed to know they're all buddy buddy all the time? Zess being stupid with that vote. Why are you trying to accuse me over questioning syllo's intentions? + Show Spoiler + On February 15 2013 01:51 yamato77 wrote: Marv I would say looks quite town, yes. I don't know about risk, but the fact that he's looking at Zess is encouraging. I do think Zess is likely mafia at this point. His attempts at "scum hunting" are truly pathetic. Suddenly zess being "stupid" has become zess is "bad" and "is mafia" because of this. The criticism is the same in both cases but the conclusion changes. When asked to clarify why zess is scum he describes his scumhunting as "careless" which tend to be a townie trait. And that he shows a "disregard for justification" which he himself has also shown.+ Show Spoiler + On February 15 2013 02:00 yamato77 wrote: I'm attacking how he is scum hunting, which is carelessly and with no regard for justification. I think yamato felt that he could safely put his vote on zessionar following (Artanis[Xp] and Hopeless1der) because he had been the center of discussion. He was not prepared to back it up because he has no good reasons and because he is mafia and wants to get his vote down and hide from attention. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
on day1... ... (non european-time zoners should pause and feel shame at this point) ... I am not satisfied with yamato's response. he write a lot but he says very little: + Show Spoiler + On February 15 2013 16:20 yamato77 wrote: Let me walk you through my thought process on Zess, since that seems to be what people think I'm not explaining. When someone starts the game as he did, voting a player under "random" pretensions, I immediately am inclined to think they're mafia. It's a very dumb way to look like you're playing around and being funny with the rest of town, when in reality you're starting what sometimes becomes a trend, establishing an early atmosphere of voting people on a whim, for almost no reason at all. It is in these types of environments that mafia thrive. And indeed, it did turn into a trend as soon as he threw his vote on me for something completely townie, and barely justifying it. How is me trying to figure out people's alignments scummy? To be clear, when I "insinuated" that Mattchew/Syllo were mafia, I was in the process of attempting to get information that would lead me toward their alignment. i consider the possibility that they are mafia, because in some way, what they're doing could come from a mafia perspective. In fact, since that time, the information I've been able to ascertain has told me the opposite, they seem town. Why does he want to paint me scum so quick for this? And indeed, when I indirectly ask about his read, he says he hasn't called me scum. What sense does this make? If anything, it only serves to strengthen my bias against him, that he's not playing to figure out my alignment, he's playing to stir shit up with me and fuck off with his reads. His other "reads" have been very noncommittal, especially with regards to Marv, where he says he "agrees with Toad" (who has voted for Marv) and then lists a whole bunch of reasons he isn't jumping on it. Waiting for the opportune moment, I presume? Perhaps I haven't really explained myself thoroughly up to this point, but when you look at him from my perspective, Zess' play makes no sense for a townie. The fact that he's continued to be spammy and contentless since my early vote on him only serves to steel my resolve. Dude is mafia. I don't know how he as a player thinks but i do know that as mafia it is quite tempting to attack things that you feel are bad instead of things that look scummy. His 2 paragraph serves no real purpose, its a defense against an accusation that nobody really remembers. His 3rd paragraph is more or less "zess tries to paint me scum"-> "zess is trying to throw me off my game"-> "zess is scum" The main reason he provides is that zessionar is "spammy and contentless", but that is no longer the case and is not what i would typically expect mafia play to look like when the thread has been so quiet at times and when zess had no meta based expectations for posting. So yamato still looks bad his vote is still suspicious and you should still vote to kill him + Show Spoiler + I also didn't see it as a wagon since i didn't notice the zess and vivax votes, but please don't let that term cause you to dismiss him as someone we shouldn't be lynching. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 16 2013 04:26 HiroPro wrote: layabout, what is your opinion on marvellosity? marvellosity's posts feel like they are coming from a town perspective and he has picked up a number of things that i have. He is not a viable or sensible lynch so it doesn't really matter. I asked why he had given up on Hopeless1der since at the moment Hopeless1der appears to be riding thread momentum and placing his vote accordingly. + Show Spoiler + sorry for the delayed response i was at dinner.+ Show Spoiler + catered halls be crazy+ Show Spoiler + did you miss the spoilers?+ Show Spoiler + because i did | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
i know artanis made a post but i personally found it unconvincing and it wasn't the cause of the votes. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
| ||
