Parallel World Mafia: Chaos of GreY

On December 13 2012 13:41 slOosh wrote:
What do you guys make of marv's ##worship?

On December 13 2012 12:37 Dienosore wrote:


That is one of the reasons, yes. I've also factored in Marv's meta read on him and how Fool handled it. Also, he hasn't really denied being scum, just sort of has been deflecting the issue by arguing with folks.

Also, my maps show that Fool has absolutely no support from anyone on either world. In fact, he even has some negative vibes from Sandro and Yomato, both of whom I consider to be playing fairly towny at this point.


Now that I've tilted my hand, it's your turn to explain your reason for voting for him.

On December 14 2012 06:44 austinmcc wrote:

I'm fine leaning away from marv atm. That takes us to

randombum
dienosore
kenpachi

Kenpachi feels like the "nobody else looks scummy" option. At the very least, I don't want us voting him now and leaving votes there when we've somewhat wasted today. So I'm most interested in randombum and dienosore.

Random HAS been reading thread, or was yesterday, but...in terms of what has happened during half this cycle, he's been MIA. He was commenting yesterday, on the swaps, on marv/foolishness/palmar, but then poof. Way less commentary when things started picking up with clarity's swaps and my objection. The change in reading/activity can be explained by any number of things, but ... I'm no longer sure that I want to stick him way on the side of "reading thread" after participation today. If that makes any sense. His reaction to clarity's swap, that clarity "screwed things up" is WEIRD. randombum was voting, and is voting, PALMAR. clarity didn't mess with randombum's vote, so I don't know what clarity could have screwed up. That phrase is...odd. Real odd.

slOosh, thoughts on that post in particular?


dienosore I'm waiting on, but he seems to be sheeping a thought process from some guy he's never explained his read on, and in doing so is voting a guy he says he is voting now as a way of "taking potshots at the scummiest looking lurkers." He's not explained yet WHY kenpachi is "the scummiest looking," unless less people talking about someone = scumminess in dienosore's mind. That troubles me.


I would prefer lynching into one of these two today over kenpachi I think? Right now the more I look at them, the more I keep disliking little things.

On December 14 2012 07:07 marvellosity wrote:


I just got to this. Why the fuck didn't you include me?

This makes me quite suspicious

On December 14 2012 07:31 marvellosity wrote:
who cares if it's dumb, don't make yourself a policy lynch with the way you play is the answer.