EPTIM BACK BROS :D
Hero Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
IM BACK BROS :D | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
Firstly, thrawn. What I find suspicious about him is that first, he only answers questions when pressured, this is an example of trying not to give information to town and because he has a bunch of one-liners in his filter. Also, shall we take a look at his vote? Oh, it's on WBG, why is it on WBG??? He says that WBG has rubbed him the scummiest out of all the responses, but I think his vote is justified, and thrawn's point is not. Because WBG says because his vote (at the time on thrawn) is because of LALiars, which is possibly true because we don't know thrawn's alignment and his intentions in doing that (although thrawn has explained why he claimed Miller, but in his explanation "It first was mostly a joke but it was also intended to jumpstart discussion", wait what? He's trying to shed a good light to his mostly bad action) Second, jaybrundage: On December 10 2012 10:32 jaybrundage wrote: You tried to brush off bears vote. And then when the whole thread is asking you to explain you dont give an answer. Ok heres my thought of process. IF you dont wanna get lynched today your gonna have to try harder then that. If your a town player then your gonna have to put some effort in your defense because as it is I could totally see my self lynching you. I dont wanna start an early easy bandwagon. But your making a pretty good case for your self why your scum. It has been said by clarity already but how I think it is, it's a attempt to avoid pressure, also the sentence after: Does he give a bloody explanation on why thrawn is making a good case why he's scum? nope (so where's the info we can discuss bro?). On December 10 2012 10:37 jaybrundage wrote: Dude... Its not whether we believe you. Your lying simple. Not a single persons believes your claim its about why are you lying. For no damn reason. And what purpose would town have to do that. It only makes sense from a mafia perspective Piggybacking other people's opinion and not giving one's own: Not giving information to the discussion. Also, lastly, I don't understand why he keeps pressuring thrawn for a response, is thrawn's response so pivotal to him? This along with clarity's case, I will vote jaybrundage. ##vote: jaybrundage So on my simple one post suspicions: On December 10 2012 12:47 wherebugsgo wrote: alrighty. I've concluded from the current events that there's an 80% preliminary chance that Palmar is scum. Therefore I'm voting him, at least until he comes back and proves me otherwise. ##unvote ##vote Palmar Why, everyone knows that chances suck balls in mafia correct? This is as same as lying to be frank (does he know more than we do? Does he know more shit so he can base his 80% chance that Palmar is scum? Is this just an attempt to get a good town player d34d through the lynch?) On December 10 2012 14:11 debears wrote: Clarity in particular I like this part That's not even the issue. How am I putting anyone in a compromising decision about whether or not to believe the claim when millers aren't even self aware? I don't understand what accusation you're trying to make, it makes no sense in the context of what the OP has to say about millers. Dude... Its not whether we believe you. Your lying simple. Not a single persons believes your claim its about why are you lying. For no damn reason. And what purpose would town have to do that. It only makes sense from a mafia perspective[/QUOTE] He says: 1) There's no town mindset in saying it 2) There's a lot of scum mindset Yet, he keeps warning thrawn he'll get lynch if he keeps it up. And the wishy-washiness despite having said the above [/QUOTE] "Hey he found it but I'll explain this thing he found!" Doesn't bother to read jaybrundage's filter, but simply describes what jay said in his post. Okay game time. Gonna drop my vote off in the voting thread | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On December 10 2012 13:07 Adam4167 wrote: In fact, why are you not voting me dabears? You say you don't like me (I assume this means you think i'm scum?), you find my lack of vote strange and that my reactions feel forced. Why make a case like this if you aren't going to follow it with a vote? ##Vote: dabears This caught my eye in Adam's filter, someone says "Oh Adam might be scum" he went into insta defensive mode, then he didn't address the accusation but only followed up with a counter vote. Seems strange? | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On December 11 2012 22:03 Vivax wrote: Hey Bluelightz, did you read? Adam got accused by dabears of not voting the guy he was questioning. Meanwhile, dabears didn't vote Adam while accusing him of this, thus making himself guilty of the same "mistake". Adam notices it, and 1. votes for him since it's what he wanted 2. Says it's suspicious that dabears himself didn't vote for Adam. Is voting necessary when one has suspicions on someone? No. It's up to them when they vote. | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
By many do you mean only you? Aaaand I don't see any "The case on Adam is bad" in clarity's filter..? | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On December 11 2012 22:09 Vivax wrote: By saying that you're actually defending Adam against dabears first accusations. Dunno if you even realize that. I'm defending dabears first accusation. | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
Also, dabear if you could explain/join this talk it would be nice. | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
Woops. By that I mean he has more posts on thrawn then a simple point on someone | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On December 12 2012 00:38 Vivax wrote: BLUELIGHTZZZZ, I need to know what you think of Palmar! He's townie, from the contributions he has produced and his activeness. | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
##Vote: Adam4167 Because of Palmar's case and my own reasons. I believe this is the most helpful vote I can put in before I sleep as I have school so can't be here @ the deadline. | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On December 12 2012 01:42 marvellosity wrote: BL, do you still think jay is the scummiest? Losing confidence in his lynch, so I switched to Adam because it will probably be the lynch (barring any new cases while I sleep) and because of the reasons I have listed. | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On December 11 2012 21:58 Bluelightz wrote: On Adam, This caught my eye in Adam's filter, someone says "Oh Adam might be scum" he went into insta defensive mode, then he didn't address the accusation but only followed up with a counter vote. Seems strange? | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On December 12 2012 01:45 Clarity_nl wrote: Are you losing confidence in his lynch or are you losing confidence that he is scum? scumuuu and lynch because of his active defence of himself and the new cases. | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On December 12 2012 01:50 Clarity_nl wrote: See, here's the problem with that explanation, that post is so vaguely worded it's hard to derive anything from it. You just threw our random suspicion.... "oh you guys this looks kinda weird, dunno!" You never said it looked scummy or townie or why. Please explain why you think he's scum other than the reasons Palmar gave. 1. Overreaction (or whatever you will call it) on thrawn's miller claim (Trying to make the most out of an easy way to lynch someone is scummy no?) 2. My above reason because to me it looks scummy because he's being very caution about himself. 3. On December 11 2012 22:58 Adam4167 wrote: + Show Spoiler + On December 11 2012 19:12 Palmar wrote: I don't understand what that "scumslip" is either. I think I explained in the video why I don't like Adam's first post: Basically, it's a legit question, but it's very easy to just click on someone's profile, go to posts and find recent games. Maybe Adam's just being lazy, but this post reeks of him trying to convey to the thread that he's going to be actively looking at people. Again, I'm working on the assumption Adam isn't dumb. It's pretty clear what thrawn is doing, and trying to wonder about it is dumb and pointless. Adam is lingering way too much on a silly stunt pulled by a random person, and asking all the wrong questions. Again, he's coming on with this idea that thrawn's actions require extensive analysis, it's very clear (to me at least) what thrawn is doing, and either it means he's scum and fucked up, or he's town and has a terrible plan-idea-thing. I concluded the latter to be the case, but adam seems really confused by something so elementary. Not putting shit in the voting thread is not scummy at all, and hardly worth talking about. I don't know why Adam keeps obsessing about irrelevant things this game. Also "I'll be watching him closely today." made me laugh. It's just how he's saying it that gets my lynchfinger all twitchy. --- In addition to this Adam calls debears out for not voting him, which is yet another thing I find fairly irrelevant, the action of voting adds or relieves no pressure at all in this game, it's the mind behind it that does. Everything Adam has done and said this game feels careful, calculated and often irrelevant and inconclusive. He should be the lynch for today. I've already defended mostly this same case from dabears, so I'm not going to go over it all again. How is playing carefully and calculated alignment indicative at all? You may have found my line of questioning irrelevant, but I didn't, hence why I did it. Vivax, can you expand on your thoughts on VE and Thrawn and why did you drop pursuit of them so suddenly? dodges a case by saying "this same case by debears" rather than responding to it (taking every opportunity to defend is in my opinion a townie thing because the townie actively seeks to prevent a mislynch, unlike here). | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
Point number one: "Because he will probably the lynch" your explanation "Oooh red font will make the reader totally understand that this point is scummy for no reason at all that I have explained :D" Point number two: "Something about sheeping" Uhh, the point I pointed out was indeed strange, and in my opinion, scummy. Does it take red font for someone to understand that a point is scummy? I gave this note out because one, I based my Adam vote on this and the existing cases, and two because this helps push my target (Adam). On December 12 2012 09:49 Clarity_nl wrote: Adam where's your crumb? ##Vote Adam4167 You are clearly sheeping too clarity. | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On December 12 2012 20:39 Palmar wrote: Hey bluelightz, you down for killing bugs tomorrow? I'm fine if there's a consensus on bugs. | ||
| ||
