EPTLooney Lynching Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
gl | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
edit: whoops should be green lol | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On October 10 2012 11:07 Hopeless1der wrote: I am unfamiliar with this policy. Please elaborate. It's a policy based upon him making posts like the following where his posts are thick with scummy justifications/ reasoning but he doesn't care because he likes having a "scummy meta." His play relies on him intentionally playing into the fact that he has a scummy meta and that's bs. On October 10 2012 19:48 kushm4sta wrote: voting momentoss because he's afk and I know his reads are bad voting original because austin has contributed way more already and he's known as a good player voting dauod because of his weird joke that made no sense... alien invaders what? bad reasons? yes subject to change? definintely | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On October 10 2012 20:02 prplhz wrote:Is EchelonTee trying to vote for Hopeless1der? I think he was saying that he's not going to actually vote until he's figured out exactly how he wants to spend all of his votes. The reasoning being that it'll make it easier on the cohosts. That's a nice sentiment and all and no offense to the mods, but that statement did sound a little scummy. But did you think it looked scummy? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
 ratio. Is there anything else you find scummy about ET because that "slip" doesn't look like anywhere near a good enough reason to vote for him. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On October 10 2012 20:42 Mementoss wrote:Than realizes shit, if I don't ask about this in the thread, it will come back to haunt me cause it will look even worse. + Show Spoiler + @ET 9 to 3 would 3x as many votes BTW That's the only part of it that makes me suspicious of ET. Asking for a specific scum/town ratio is stupid because a mod will never give you the answer so it doesn't seem like a question someone would ask unless they have ulterior motives behind asking the question. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On October 10 2012 20:02 prplhz wrote: Big plans almost always fail but it's often a pretty good idea to talk about them anyway. Is EchelonTee trying to vote for Hopeless1der? I like Djodref's posting and I don't like da0ud's posting. Well, as much as you can like and dislike stuff 2 pages into the game. In any case I'm going to vote for da0ud right now. He's only gonna get one vote from me (for now) because that's enough to put him in next round. da0ud x1 He asks that question about ET... it looks like he asking a question in order to cast some suspicion on ET but he doesn't say why he thinks ET's vote was suspicious. And as for his vote for da0ud, he spends more time giving justifications for the vote than reasons why he's suspicious of da0ud. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On October 11 2012 06:15 prplhz wrote: Also, I wanted to ask you about kushm4sta because it seemed that you had a pretty good read on him in that last newbie game he just played. What do you want to know? So far he's playing pretty similarly to his weird/scummy town meta. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On October 11 2012 06:54 kushm4sta wrote: haha what? in what newbie game did thrawn have a good read on me? lol I think he might have been talking about the game I cohosted in which I already knew your alignment... but yeah I was kinda confused about what answer he wanted from the question too | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On October 11 2012 06:56 prplhz wrote: I want to know what his alignment is. What the hell does this mean? "pretty similar weird scummy town meta", seriously? Can you elaborate a bit? Ok when kush is town, he reads as scum. He says stuff that would get anyone else lynched, but he gets away with it but it's part of his meta. Therefore he can be difficult to read. There is 1 difference between his scum meta and his town meta, and that's that when he's scum there's a lot of forced emotion and unnecessary aggressiveness in his posts. When he's town he's generally more laid back. So far I'm seeing the "scummy town kush" rather than the "scummy scum kush." | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
Djo why did you vote mememtoss? So far out of the two of them I'd rather see da0ud go through, just because he hasn't done anything at all except make weird "jokes" that may not even be jokes. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
Does unvoting working like normal? Just ##Unvote in the voting thread or something? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On October 11 2012 08:12 kushm4sta wrote: Thrawn did you read my point about how it's a scum mentality to say that byes are at a "disadvantage"? vote daoud IMO! I really dont want to overrule other people's votes by voting more than once. Yeah but it's so little to go off of and I don't think that alone would make him a better choice than djodref. Something strikes me as odd about djod's play so far this game. In his last game (town) he was this super happy friendly cutie townie, and his posts in this game seem way more thought out or crafted. So there's Du0ud who has post almost next to nothing, but his first post was strange and mostly useless. You say there was mafia mentality behind it, but I'm not buying that that argument is as strong as you're making it out to be. Then there's djodref.... I'm want to know why he voted memento. It looked like it might have been some type of lurker vote but there were other lurker candidates to choose from. Also as I think austin or someone else pointed out, it was weird the way he called out some people for things and not others. For example he came in saying he agreed with my post where I talked about voting policy but then he turns around and says he is suspicious of people who talk about vote policy because "the more time we discuss about the rules we should use, the less time we have for scumhunting. It's also a golden opportunity for the mafia to look like they are participating while discussing the rules." It looked like he's trying too hard to find suspicious things to point out and that is what scum have to do. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On October 11 2012 08:43 Djodref wrote: Regarding the discussion about the lynch mechanics, it was the only thing which really happened in the thread when I've checked it first. I didn't like it at all. So I got suspicious of the players encouraging this discussion. What else are people supposed to talk about at the beginning of the game? | ||
| ||
