EPTRockband Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
prplhz could very well be scum. If he is, hapahauli is still town because he is defending him in a townie way. austinmcc is scum. I present the following post as evidence. On September 18 2012 06:55 austinmcc wrote: <3 everyone at all, but you need to look further. He's generally not being killed off for supersexy scumhunting, but because he comes off as very townie and is generating a lot of discussion/activity from others. His early reads, although I haven't read recent games, are not generally a big threat to mafia. I don't know how anyone can munch on pudding. I DO kind of like that observation. It feels almost TOO obvious but...man it's kind of damning. I very much agree with BH's case, but I need to read more. The only problem I have is austin's reaction as I feel like maybe we should just lynch him instead. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On September 18 2012 09:39 iamperfection wrote: he is a big boy. i dont think he will lose sleep over it. Confirms my post above. No scum would say this. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
Will read more attentively later, some of you guys textwall like bosses. Here's my current idea of the thread. I will deny! iamperfection Hapahauli blazinghand Palmar Junglers Zephirdd Mementoss bluelightz prplhz Ange777 mkfuba07 5 carries on your team Marvellosity HiroPro austinmcc | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On September 18 2012 23:48 Ange777 wrote: @Palmar: Why wouldn't scum say this? While I agree with Blazinghand and hapa leaning town, I can't understand how you are giving iamperfection townie points. Because it's posted in such a matter-of-fact-I-don't-need-to-worry kind of way, he just posted another thing that looks good regarding mkfuba's school. he's basically being very straight up, which is townielike. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On September 19 2012 00:17 Zephirdd wrote: Meta. He's shown waaaay too much interest to be scum palmar Nothing in my filter suggests I'm town yet. I've only been confirmed town once so far, but you're not good enough to notice it, so why do you want to be my friend? | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
Do you want to kill marv? austin? Hiro? give me something. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On September 19 2012 01:35 marvellosity wrote: No, it's not convincing, but I found his point about throwing a bunch of new candidates into an already divided town pretty decent. I disagree on GK for the reason I outlined earlier. Do you honestly think that this is a valid point? Should I just hold back my opinions because they don't match what's already going on? screw this, marv is scum. I'll prove it later ##vote marvellosity | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
Also irrelevant because we're lynching marvellosity today. On September 19 2012 05:59 Zephirdd wrote: and finally, his lynch provides nearly zero information "lynch for information" is a thing scum invented to make bad lynches happen. Never think about the "information" a lynch will give you again. Oh, I noticed you went on to vote imperfection who's like confirmed town. Start thinking, unless of course you're scum. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On September 18 2012 06:46 marvellosity wrote: P.S the whole point is that iamp's suggestion wasn't random, so we already have a liar. LAL? Possibly a joke, I wasn't in the game when this was written so I don't know how the mood was in the thread. The random lynch suggestion, while strange, bears no meaning to his alignment. This is important: When I joined the game marv had made exactly one post worth reading. It was a long-winded post but it had very little substance to it, at least for someone I would consider a good player. He basically rehashed the reasons why a case against hapahauli was bad (duh) and then proceeded to vote for a lurker. The point is marv was really, really not doing jack shit in the game until I actually came in and called him out on it. He seems to have really changed things up. He even changed his entire attitude to be more badass. If you don't believe me, read his filter before, and after this post: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16286762 On September 19 2012 01:35 marvellosity wrote: No, it's not convincing, but I found his point about throwing a bunch of new candidates into an already divided town pretty decent. I disagree on GK for the reason I outlined earlier. What I take from this post is that marv for some reason has a problem with me not following whatever trends are already happening in town. The bad thing about replacing in is that you miss a ton of important reactional stuff, the good thing is that you start with a completely unbiased point of view. I decided to post as I read through what had already happened in the game. So, marv's problem is essentially that I had my own point of view. Did you think I wouldn't tell people what I thought about other people in the game? Should I just not call out my reads because they "mess with an already divided town"? It's a real problem when you're actively encouraging people to not read the thread objectively. Unless of course you're scum. On September 19 2012 02:28 marvellosity wrote: Palmar's play so far: 1. lol call 3 people scum for no reason 2. give out townreads to make self look townie (wow I can do this too, does this actually give town credit around here now? I should have known) 3. vote someone for no reason na, piss off Palmar. There is a marked difference between giving townreads for the hell of it, and giving town reads because it's applicable to give townreads. You already know that I hate it when people do the stupid "don't give your town reads" shit. On September 19 2012 05:34 marvellosity wrote: also, I'll answer you on Palmar if you can give me a coherent scum motivation behind my blatant OMGUS gogogo That's not how the game works, if it did you could just OMGUS every time and say "no scum would do that". I take your OMGUS as having almost nothing to do with your alignment, I take your attempt at using it to make you look like town based on that, as very, very indicative of you being scum. On September 19 2012 05:55 Hapahauli wrote: Seasoned players vote like that all the time, and I have yet to connect a mafia-mentality with prplhz. Weak sheeping from a seasoned player can absolutely be null. It's all got to do with how they sheep and why. Not the face-value of just sheeping. We need to kill marv today. Just for effect/emphasis ##Vote marvellosity | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
The attempt to discredit me for nothing other than throwing out ideas and calling it a valid point is terrible. It doesn't help that marv is agreeing with a point made by his previous scumread. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On September 19 2012 18:16 Ange777 wrote: @Blazinghand: Hapa unvoted marv previously and hasn't set his vote on anyone else yet. So we are missing two votes. @Palmar: THIS and I am still not sold on iamperfection's confirmed town status. Just because of the attitude he gave that statement in? How about his awful case on Zeph and the lack of any scum hunting activity from him since? Dude I make calls on little stuff all the time. All these textwalls mean nothing. To be completely fair, that little post I quoted from myself where I first voted marv was reason enough to kill him. I make a case so the derps can understand. Now be a good derp and vote for marv. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
| ||
