EPTDeath Note Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
| ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
/in  | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
| ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
I also think that finishes the list :D | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
On August 30 2012 21:52 marvellosity wrote: which incidentally guarantees you will be wrong Ya lose good hats that way  | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
| ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
| ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
On August 31 2012 11:46 Hapahauli wrote: I disagree. No one here is a newbie, and every competent town player should know that lurking is bad in a 24 hour setup. As far as I'm concerned, if someone is not putting in the effort on their own after committing to such an intense setup, they are anti-town and deserve significant suspicion. I don't want to have to let anyone know. If someone lurks, my "reminder" will be a D1 lynch hammer, and they'll have to claw their way out to survive. Guess I'm going to have to step it up from previous games. I agree though. | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
| ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
On August 31 2012 14:57 Shady Sands wrote: Fair enough. You still haven't posted any reads D1 yet. We're more than 12 hours in. What are your reads? We're actually only about 5 hours into the game atm. | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
I don't feel like BMB's case on Hapa is particularly compelling, but given the point in the game that it was written, that's to be expected. I do find it strange that he mentioned Hapa's discussion of lurker policy, again given the point in the game, since that's all there is to talk about. What should Hapa have been discussing instead? @s&b I thought Hapa's vote on Hopeless was part of the beginning-of-game banter, so I dismissed it. I actually felt the same way as Hopeless, so Hapa's vote seemed more comical than scummy. I found the entire post to be a null tell. And I will try to avoid a no-lynch at all cost. I don't like starting D2 without learning anything at the end of D1. I'll find anyone pushing a no-lynch suspicious. Even with a mislynch on a lurker (no, I'm not hoping for a mislynch), someone has to push for it, and that reveals peoples' motivations. @Hapa You probably slipped that up because I've been so lurky. I'm awake now though :D | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
| ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
| ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
HiroPro's case was convincing. Momentoss seems to be casting a wide net of suspicion without committing to anything. Even his Mr.Zentor vote is just "for now..." He seems indifferent as to who gets lynched. On September 01 2012 02:07 Mementoss wrote: I don't know what else to say to you. I don't think ghost is scum, though I didn't like the way he defended bmb. BMB has been getting constantly talked about and called scum by every second person. I want to give him a chance to respond to the thread. Voting Mr.Zentor is going to make him post something I think is worthy of him showing that he is going to make an attempt at being useful this game. You've officially went from soft defending Zentor to hard defending him, in an aggressive way against me. Guess you voting him at the start of the game was two scum buddy buddying around in the thread? + Show Spoiler + On September 01 2012 01:40 Shady Sands wrote: This post makes absolutely no sense. Momen can you further explain? Who dafuq is momen. I haven't felt like Hapa has been defending Mr.Z at all, but has instead been trying to figure out why Momentoss is voting him instead of any of the other candidates he's mentioned, or even any of the other lurkers. Momentoss then builds this "hard defense" into an associative case where neither of the players involved has flipped (naturally). These claims can be made of anyone who has responded to anything another player has said, and cannot be proven or disproven without a lynch on one of the two involved. In fact, I was lightly involved in the "buddy buddying" around in the beginning, and am now "hard defending" Mr.Z by his logic. Am I next on the scumlist? This line of reasoning may seem like scumhunting but there's nothing to base a read on. ##Vote Momentoss | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
##Vote Mementoss | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
I'll start with why I didn't suspect Shady. Essentially, I find it incredibly difficult to read him this early. He's the player in this game that I have the most experience playing with (most cases against), and his behaviour is incredibly similar to this regardless of his alignment. I've mislynched him for the same reasons I've voted for him when he was scum, and I feel that more information is needed for me to consider him a good lynch. Now onto why I voted for Mementoss. HiroPro's was the first case I found to be actually convincing. Most of the reasoning is covered in my previous post as well as the original HiroPro post. But my biggest concern was when you tried to tie Hapa and Mr.Z together as a scumteam. I now understand your reasoning based on recent posts, but at the time it seemed like you were just throwing together an associative case with no basis (or at least based on very flimsy support). This was suspicious to me because such a case would require a lynch on one of the people involved to even confirm viability. It's like an "accuse two, lynch one free" case. I generally find them scummy because they're almost pure WIFOM until one of the members flip. There is nothing we can do with such a case without lynching one of them first, and I found the reasons for lynching each individual lackluster. Mementoss has since addressed my pressing concerns, so now I have to decide which of the other cases I think is most viable. ##Unvote | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
##Vote Mementoss | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
On September 01 2012 10:23 Hapahauli wrote: Yo dawg, what do you think of HiroPro, and the strong defense being mounted for him so far? I'm not convinced by the case. It may be because I have similar feelings in terms of scumreads as HP, aside from this nagging thought that my suspicions haven't been addressed. On September 01 2012 10:24 Shady Sands wrote: This is just stupid. The only people who swapped off MMToss were you and HP. how could there be scum support? There were more people defending MMToss than the two of us who switched off. I can think of three people who defended Mementoss when he became my strongest scumread. You don't need to be involved in the vote to defend someone against being lynched. | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
| ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
| ||
| ||
