EPTGL all ^.^
Normal Mini Mafia III
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
GL all ^.^ | ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
On August 15 2012 07:55 Probulous wrote: Hi there  I assume this is also your first game of mafia. Don't be intimidated, we won't bite much. As with DJ I would highly recommend you read the stickied threads and the guides. It is also a useful to skim through a few games just to get the feel of how things run. Echoing marvel, if you are transparent and post frequently you'll do fine. Good luck! No worries, I have played mafia before. Just first time with a thread-like format is all. ^.^ | ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
| ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
| ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
#FoS marvellosity | ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
btw- Was at work and just got a new phone so I was setting up, plus full time student(no web blocks=sweetness ^.^). | ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
What i gathered is that you claim to 'sheep' and yet you yourself have done nothing else but provide one liners and start nothing but chaos. If it makes you feel any better #Vote marvellosity | ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
On August 22 2012 22:01 Palmar wrote: Kville it's not an unreasonable thing to do by marv to cast his vote on you, when at the time you had simply not posted in the thread. While it doesn't absolve marv of being mafia, that vote says absolutely nothing about Marv's alignment, and you seem to have decided not to dig any further into his play in the game. In fact, any reasonable townie would realize that there's nothing about "being first" that increases marv's chances of being scum. Why did you only consider him? You're not dumb enough to think the mafia team would decide to all vote randomly like that, are you? Why did you not even mention the other people going after you? Of course no team mobs will ever vote together, but one does need to set fire to the match. Sandy Shades wasn't in my window until I posted which is why i never mentioned him although i will be looking into him and jing will give intent and info. about his reasoning, doesn't mean he is off the list but its better than just shooting in the dark. | ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
On August 22 2012 23:47 marvellosity wrote: Fairly happy with where my vote stands at the moment, given Kville's responses having come into the game (he decided to ignore my question, too). Bluelightz, you can't come into this game all eager because of the playerlist and then go "he's suspicious, but now he's not" and disappear again. Step it up. Shady I don't like because of how he twisted Obvious' post. But he's active and I'm wary of mislynching him because he has a tendency for some foot-in-mouth action. I'm quite suspicious of talis; a lot of his posts have this... touchy-feely-careful feel to them. " Actually to be completely honest", "this suggestion felt to me", "which is how I initially read it", and The question of what i thought of talis and obvious? Well i can't say much about talis but his posts do seem a little sketchy aslways as obvious. My top three suspects seem to be : talis obvious shady I'll post more about these three later when i get home from my classes. Until then ##Unvote | ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
shady talis obvious marv Does that fit your taste? | ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
On August 23 2012 01:08 Shady Sands wrote: That's strange. Shouldn't the town response be to build a solid case on someone instead of posting rainchecked analysis? You are correct. There should be a solid case, which is where my mistake was given such little time given at this moment i cannot post one right now which is why I provided much little information about what i gathered about my suspects Which is the sole reason why I withdrew my vote. Does not mean he is off my radar, | ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
On August 23 2012 01:30 Shady Sands wrote: So basically you're pretending to agree with me to make me think we are on the same page even though you logically claim to be on the opposite side from me. AKA appeasing me and sweeping it under the rug, just like you did with Marv. No your still a scum and i plan to prove it. | ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
On August 23 2012 01:32 Shady Sands wrote: This makes no sense. How does "leader lemming" = scum? Also, you're twisting Marv's efforts to spark discussion here--a perfectly townish action--into scummy play. Why? Spark discussion about what? More meanlingless accusations? I stopped a useless random day 1 lynch. It would have been a waste if it had gone any further. It takes one scum to light the match. He was a leader of followers, does it mean that those followers can be scum to? Possibly and we will just might we will see. | ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
| ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
Reason im not scum in order by my filter -I was thrown under bus becuase i was supposed lurker -Tried to counter the vote and suspected marv based on his recent one liners and random lynch on me -All i tired to do was end the accusations on me -Turned heads towards shady based on filters between VE and shady even more so since the recent ones came out. -obvious filters seem out of ordinary as well same as marvs Im not a scum just quick reaction responses becuase of the scenario and place i was at (school). If anything im liking VEs choice and the way he is basing his decisions. | ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
If you read his filters from the start he does nothing but the old attack and demand with no feedback himself. Examples So you're basically saying everyone who is against random lynch gets to randomly vote for one person from people who are for random lynch? While we're at it, how about a clear statement from you on lynching lurkers vs rando-voting vs whatever other idea you have... instead of fingering people for yoda-speak and rando-voting He asks but never gives. Everything you respond to becomes his juice to attack a player. What are your input about the lurkers that are still yet to be? such as lvdr when this was posted On August 22 2012 07:33 Lvdr wrote: I support lynching lurkers. Just as a tidbit, I've never been mafia on here, but I decided that if I was: I would accuse a random player in the manner of Shady D1. All you gave was This post doesn't smell right. Then you attack and twist Obvious with this right after This doesn't smell right either. + Show Spoiler + ]First you say: Lurker lynches good backup Then you say: Easy lynches bad Then you say: Not good to do lurker lynches just yet. Then you make a non-sequitur attempt at humor. So basically if we shouldn't go for lurker lynches, and we shouldn't call out the guy who is obviously scummy, then what, exactly, should we be doing? After he finally found a bandwagon becuase i was claimed to be a lurker he attacked me with this ## Vote: Kville All aboard the midnight express... to hell. + Show Spoiler + Note how Kville switches from this: On August 22 2012 21:42 Kville wrote: Lemmings will be lemmings and you just happend to be the one in front. What i gathered is that you claim to 'sheep' and yet you yourself have done nothing else but provide one liners and start nothing but chaos. If it makes you feel any better #Vote marvellosity to this: On August 23 2012 01:02 Kville wrote: Show nested quote + The question of what i thought of talis and obvious? Well i can't say much about talis but his posts do seem a little sketchy aslways as obvious. My top three suspects seem to be : talis obvious shady I'll post more about these three later when i get home from my classes. Until then ##Unvote In the span of 3 posts. That's pretty wierd. Marv goes from being a vote to being not even in his top 3. With no justification on any of his reads except a rain check. He lurked me until the time came to attack when i made my statement. He now knows that since i am at a corner he can keep piling the bandwagon and keep attacking until the lynch comes and he will find others to attack and go back to strike again. Its not clean becuase i messed up on the tags but thats my take on shady. | ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
hmm that is interesting Im going to check into that aswell. | ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
On August 23 2012 21:27 Shady Sands wrote: ebwop: the first vote on KV was a rando vote. but i'm still sticking with it because of how much better the case on him has gotten. In other words, I'm easier to target and lynch for a scum. | ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
But lets look at the case: Obviously i'm just a bad townie. Who more to target than someone who blantantly messed upon entering. Scums only seek easy targets, which is why he never attacks VE becuase he is strong and will be almost impossible to attack during the day. I already made my name and he will use it until he completely seals the deal. | ||
|
Kville
United States173 Posts
So KV constantly arguing he's a bad townie is a null tell in my opinion, 1. I never argured about being a bad townie until now? On the other hand, if he built a case on something other than OMGUS, he might be able to persuade me. 2. I'm not trying to persuade you that i'm not a scum so it's irrevelant to provide any information to what you say. Why would I tell anything to a scum to further, inorder plant onto someone else? That is just helping you target someone. Your falling apart now Bro. ##Vote Shady Sands | ||
| ||
