EPTDBZ Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
MajuGarzett
Canada635 Posts
| ||
|
MajuGarzett
Canada635 Posts
On July 24 2012 22:47 HiroPro wrote: Eh revealing your power level isnt such a great idea... Gives mafia an idea of who to eliminate. I have a very simple way to ensure that lynches happen the way they should: if you are not voting for the candidate with the most votes, then right before the deadline you must switch your vote to this candidate. Effectively, this then becomes a plurality lynch. That just discourages different viewpoints. How would that be good while trying to scum hunt? | ||
|
MajuGarzett
Canada635 Posts
I agree with heist about themichael's play. He says he just wants to lynch someone randomly. Though he says he would rather lynch for information he is one of the first people to vote before much time has passed and info can be gathered. Also choosing completely randomly is unlikely. He should have at least had some reason for sinensis such as that sinensis had already voted so his lynch would give info. Michael just disregards all logic and votes for whomever he pleases. ##Vote: TheMichael | ||
|
MajuGarzett
Canada635 Posts
On July 26 2012 04:34 MajuGarzett wrote: Sorry for being gone for so long though I feel not being present isn't a good way to decide a vote. I agree with heist about themichael's play. He says he just wants to lynch someone randomly. Though he says he would rather lynch for information he is one of the first people to vote before much time has passed and info can be gathered. Also choosing completely randomly is unlikely. He should have at least had some reason for sinensis such as that sinensis had already voted so his lynch would give info. Michael just disregards all logic and votes for whomever he pleases. ##Vote: TheMichael EBWOP I meant is stupid, I fused it with the thought that he just voted for some town player not making the vote completely random. | ||
|
MajuGarzett
Canada635 Posts
On July 26 2012 06:46 ghost_403 wrote: I'd actually be pretty happy lynching Heist at the moment. Any particular reason for that? I like his vote and he's been active at the very least. | ||
|
MajuGarzett
Canada635 Posts
On July 26 2012 07:32 Mattchew wrote: Kind of. When I first read michaels posts I was like, "wtf could he be more apathetic about this lynch?!" Once I read hiro's explanation he went back to a null tell. I think the fact that Maju's reasoning for voting is purely the fact that he is doesn't like a random lynch and that he thinks michael is scum for that. However, I find a huge contradiction in what Maju is doing to michael. Maju says michaels vote is without logic (even though he attempted to justify it, much better than Maju did) and also clings to a single reason, which is what he says makes michael scum. My main reason for lynching Michael is actually that he says he wants to lynch for information then votes before he gets any information. Also, my vote has to be more logical than his as he claims his vote is random. On July 26 2012 07:22 s0Lstice wrote: firstly, I agree with the defense. I don't think there is a strong meta argument to be made on Maju at the moment. There is just not enough to go on in that regard. I however find his vote on michaelthe pretty suspicious. I think this is a good enough reason to kill him today, honestly. It feels a lot like a scummer latching on to the first blatantly scummy thing a townie does and running with it. His tone when he explained the vote seemed really played up. It's obvious the reasoning is pretty shitty (why not be upfront about it), but he talks it up anyway. Do you agree Matt? So you're saying that I'm scum for wanting to lynch someone who did something scummy? | ||
|
MajuGarzett
Canada635 Posts
And Michael, do you have no other defence than "town is shitty"? You should be lynched for your attitude even if you aren't scum. | ||
| ||
