EPT/in
Bureaucracy Mafia!
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
/in | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On July 10 2012 09:53 kitaman27 wrote: That picture of VE and BH looks suspiciously close to the mafia communication structure! /in My Archon buddy! | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
People are being shy violets right now but I like what probulous has posted thus far. Looking back at PYP insane, Chez tried to look as scummy as possible and people passed it off as "just chez being chez." Looking at his opening post I almost feel like a similar theme is in the offing. It'd be irresponsible to call someone scum after one post but I just want to put this out there, especially since there since foolishness and I are the only other people who were in that game so he may feel he can get away with it again. gotta get out dat FoS: Chezinu | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
What part of FoS is me calling Chez scum? Can you tell me what FoS means? | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On July 16 2012 15:43 Blazinghand wrote: To add to my previous post, which is unreasonably short: That's awfully irresponsible of you, M_Z. Are you FoSing him without calling him scum? Way to take any air whatosever out of your FoS. You're probably worried that you'll be told by your overlords that he's scum with you and you want an excuse not to vote him later. ##unvote ##vote: Meapak_Ziphh lulz didn't scroll. So apparently I need to define FoS. Stands for Finger of Suspicion. Gives a heads up to Chez that his current play isn't working and that he needs to change or it's lynch time. When I vote for someone, I want them to die and will work for that unless significant evidence can convince me otherwise. If you just throw votes around like you (and bugs -_-) are doing, they get the air taken out of them. My post was prompted by remembering Chez's previous gambit I saw him play. Either he continues to play scummy and we kill him, or he shapes up and plays nice. Obviously he could still be scum even if he shapes up but it'll be much harder for him to cause chaos if he's playing nice and we catch him later on. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On July 16 2012 15:09 Q-bert-Z wrote: Walton, are you the Batman? Rest of you: Mafia have an advantage in numbers. We need to find a way to use this against them. They also have a disadvantage in communication, and we need to make sure we exploit that as much as possible. A few ideas coming to mind: Large numbers will make it slightly easier to lynch a mafia, as long as we can keep communication to a minimum with them. They can only send one message a day, so we should try to create an environment that is shifting too much for that message to be useful. Remember, they can't organize and respond to lynches effectively like a normal mafia. hmm this slipped by me. What dearest smurf here seems to be suggesting sounds like a scum heaven. In a constantly shifting environment, scum will never be forced to take a solid position on anything thus allowing them to skate by. While disrupting scum communication is a worthy goal, it's not worth sacrificing a stable town atmosphere to do so. A better method is more along the lines of what probulous suggested; jump on anyone who has sudden and rather odd changes of heart. This is coming up because of your post history so far smurfette... let's not continue down this road k thnx. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On July 16 2012 15:59 Q-bert-Z wrote: You must be new here. I'll be nice then. Chezinu is the definition of amazing play. You must learn to get past the cunning language that he puts forth to veil what he speaks from the unworthy. Just because you speak a different language doesn't mean he's not playing the game. Learn to play his game and you'll find a treasure trove of wisdom and knowledge. He is, after all, Walton. As far as "holding people to their day one reads", I must say I've heard worse things, though not many. Let me ask you this...what is the probubality of our day one reads being any good? Day one reads are the worse reads we're going to get... If you're just gonna troll then I'm fine pushing you off the boat first. You run the risk of being blinded by chez's veil. In your haste to hail him as a speaker of wisdom and knowledge you miss the fact that he has actually played a fairly successful scum game using this tactic. @Probe, do my posts need more fire and brimstone? | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
There's nothing to explain, it's like the second post in the game and it makes a lot of sense. If someone has been going tunnel city on someone else and then next day they completely ignore it I think it's worth lynching into. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
Marvellosity Blazinghand Rastaban Supersoft Scum or town, go. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On July 17 2012 02:10 supersoft wrote: yes of course, but do you think it's worth mentioning? This stuff is common sense. dont you think that these thought are rather thoughts a scumplayer has, because he has to control and plan who he accuses? Could you quote stuff? I didn't realize this was directed at me. I actually do think it's worth pointing out because in a normal game, the only people who suddenly change their minds are DTs who got a red (or green) check. Someone doing an about face is often a good way of lynching scum without having to claim DT. In this game however, it'll be scum doing about faces so I think it's good to get it out there so we don't have to sift through multiple DT claims later in the game. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
Actually yes. You've done this before, I want to know if you're going to go through with it. If you're not, then you were essentially just causing chaos. That's not a very promising mark on your record. So let's get rid of the asshole act and you can sit down and play nice or I'll assume that you were just trolling with the RL shit and I'll give Katina's case a second look. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On July 17 2012 02:31 sandroba wrote: Why in hell are you still talking about this. Isn't there anything more productive for you to comment on? I'm continuing my conversation with supersoft, read the thread. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On July 17 2012 02:42 syllogism wrote: Meapak you never replied to my post here. I don't expect much from the reply, but I do expect something In green | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On July 17 2012 02:43 supersoft wrote: ah I corrected that list for you ;-) *stop going for palmar. All of you. That guy works best if you let him do his job. judge him based on his results not based on his playstyle. + this makes him the most hillarious player so far. We can't afford to lose him. Despite what he'll have you believe, Palmar is not allergic to contributing. Bolded part is extremely retarded, Palmar isn't good enough to justify giving special privileges to. Only player of that caliber in this game is foolishness and even so it'd be nice if he'd make an appearance soonish. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On July 17 2012 03:13 Mattchew wrote: cause you are playing an easy to fake pro-town without actually doing anything pro-town That's bullshit and you know it lol. | ||
| ||
