A simple yes or no would have sufficed, a 12:47 video to answer a quick question seems a bit excessive.

Unless the time is showing up correctly and you're just trying to distract me until role PMs go out?

Clearly a conspiracy. I vote we policy lynch release.

JingleHell

United States11308 Posts

July 04 2012 02:15 GMT

#44

On July 04 2012 11:10 Radfield wrote:
My apologies everyone!!

Got a little tied up here!

Ahh. The infamous Woman - The only special power that can, unlimited times per day or night, roleblock anyone, including the host. Or so I assume.

JingleHell

United States11308 Posts

July 04 2012 02:17 GMT

#46

I take it the host has forgotten that one of the greens is actually a miller, which is a stealth attach to a VT?

JingleHell

United States11308 Posts

July 04 2012 02:36 GMT

#51

No, really, I thought the usual method with the miller was just attach that role secretly to a VT, which would mean it's still a 12 player format? Am I just confused?

JingleHell

United States11308 Posts

July 04 2012 02:44 GMT

#56

Sounds good to me.

JingleHell

United States11308 Posts

July 04 2012 21:43 GMT

#69

So, since Lazer already opened with the pre-requisite long-winded "Please don't lynch me" post, I'd feel silly making a similar one, so instead, I'm going to open by asking Evulrabbitz why his name references a sex toy. After that question, of course, it suddenly feels awkward, but unless he can answer it well, FoS Evulrabbitz

JingleHell

United States11308 Posts

July 04 2012 21:51 GMT

#71

Ok, if you don't know, I kind of feel obliged not to tell you, just to be honest.

FoS is Finger of Suspicion. It means I have my eye on you.

Also, does anyone else find it scummy that a male geek is trying to say he doesn't understand a reference to a widely popularized sex toy?

JingleHell

United States11308 Posts

July 04 2012 22:07 GMT

#77

On July 05 2012 07:01 Evulrabbitz wrote:
Considering I have used this nickname over the course of several years am I the only one who finds it suspicious that JingleHell is the first the reference it to a sex toy? Does that not tell us about what kind of shady traits said person might have in his core personality. Definitely not trustworthy.

Trust me you don't want to try and figure it out from work. It's not some scary thing, but I sincerely doubt any place referring to it is something you should open at work.

As for core personality traits, what in the hell would those have to do with being scum or not? Trying to direct attention at me based on the person behind the randomized role is ridiculous. It's almost as ridiculous as pointing suspicion at someone based on their username, which I have discovered is an excellent method for getting people to start talking, which is decidedly beneficial to the town.

JingleHell

United States11308 Posts

July 04 2012 22:12 GMT

#80

On July 05 2012 07:09 The_Zen_Man wrote:
Hey guys, this will be my third game. I learned a lot from my previous game, and hope i can play better now.

I will be going to sleep now, but more post will come tomorrow.

Btw, i tried googling for evulrabbitz sex toy, but nothing came up.

You're not creative enough. It's not quite that direct of a correlation.

JingleHell

United States11308 Posts

July 04 2012 22:27 GMT

#84

I had hoped that with the blatant comments about it being totally different, I wouldn't need to say it was sarcasm. I just want people talking. It's working.

And no, you're on the right track, but you've got some extra letters there.

JingleHell

United States11308 Posts

July 04 2012 22:32 GMT

#87

On July 05 2012 07:30 Hopeless1der wrote:
I think Jingle's got us covered with the perverted sex toy discussions.

It's really not that perverted of a toy. What do you people take me for? This isn't like the chainsaw thing in Eurotrip, damn.

However, now I'm going to add an FoS Hopeless for jumping on the bandwagon of hinting that I'm some sort of perv with a complete throwaway post.

JingleHell

United States11308 Posts

July 04 2012 22:42 GMT

#90

I think we should policy lynch anyone who doesn't recognize veiled innuendo. And Hopeless, I'm awaiting your defense.

JingleHell

United States11308 Posts

July 04 2012 22:56 GMT

#98

Well, Hopeless, since you're at least talking, I don't think you're scum yet. However, if day1 lurkers start causing trouble, I'm all for just throwing the dice and lynching one just to make a clear point.

Also, just as wonky meta, compared to your D1 play in XIX, I'm pretty sure you're town here. You're not afraid of prolific D1 posting, among other things.

Actually, I'm VERY suspicious about YourHarry's lightning fast vote. Could be a throwaway effort to get a bandwagon started, since D1 voting is nonsense in newbie games. In the case of a mislynch, it would be easy to argue away.

JingleHell

United States11308 Posts

July 04 2012 22:58 GMT

#99

##Vote YourHarry

JingleHell

United States11308 Posts

July 04 2012 23:05 GMT

#101

EBWOP: And Harry, don't try to turn my logic around on me, my vote was based on your suspicious vote.

Your quote on Hopeless wasn't what I'd call a real reason to vote for someone who's at least being active, and not particularly suspicious.

Voting for him that way makes you look scummy, considering you've said nothing of real substance yet.

JingleHell

United States11308 Posts

July 04 2012 23:07 GMT

#103

And no, I don't play on mafiascum. But the vote against Hopeless looks like an effort to kick off the D1 bandwagon, since you hadn't contributed anything of substance prior, he hadn't said anything worth attacking, and if we're going to risk a bandwagon mislynch, we should at least aim it at a lurker who's passively a detriment, or based on scummy behavior. Like yours.