EPTgreymist's brother, actually got an account lol
Normal Mini Mafia II
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
greymist's brother, actually got an account lol | ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
If we dont find something to talk about then we won't find out Whoes scum. Policies for lynching is as good a topic as any | ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
On July 06 2012 11:58 Zephirdd wrote: Good, so what's your opinion on the common policy lynches (lurkers, liars, specific players)?  (for the record, I pretty much agree with MrZentor) Basically I just say all that lynch all liers lynch all lurkers etc. But yea it's sircumstantual, I mean im not gonna just condem someone just because he breaks a rule period. | ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
On July 06 2012 12:38 Bluelightz wrote: Questions! Mr. SloOsh Dr.wiggl3s has not done anything yet why are you voting him? Why do you agree? Why is policy lynches good as any other topic? What do you mean in this post? Policies are stuff that are enforced (for example A lurks and because we are doing Lynch All Lurkers we lynch A correct)? As response to your first question on me. I don't know what to tell you. I figure that lynching policy is just a good conversation starter. It gets people talking and it helps scum hunt In response to the second. what I ment was that I believe that we can't just kill someone without stopping to think about it first if he broke a policy. 99 percent of the time I'll be for it but I like to think about it a little bit before I just vote lynch | ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
On July 07 2012 00:19 Zephirdd wrote: Also I want to hear from MsZontar, drwiggl3s, sloosh, Dangeresque77. They all posted nothing. Sloosh, you showed a different play on movie star. The other three, I want your opinions on everything that happened so far and you find relevant; Don't stay shut without words. sorry ive been asleep anyways heres what i think so far i would be ok to vote for prplhz but im not totally convinced that hes scum. then again it would help to jst go ahead and lynch one person to give us a starting ground 1. from a town perspective. prplhz has been poking and prodding marvelosity and others. marv primely if he is town he could be just tring to get people to react to being accused and see what they do. a good way of scum hunting 2. if he is mafia. he is trying to throw random suspicion around as to slow down the process of finding scum and make everyone vote for someone different either way. he hasn't really contributed to anything except to confuse people also im a little suspicious of Sinensis. like others have said his posts sound suspicious. i think we need to here more from him before we decide on anything | ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
On July 07 2012 02:15 marvellosity wrote: I mean... I guess I have to respond :/ Pre-game and ingame ARE NOT THE SAME THING. Cooey. More inquisitive? Why don't you look at my filter and see how many questions I've asked? I just read your filter Yes 90% of what you say is a question This is not a good thing Mafia ask this many questions. You know why? Because by asking a question you are skirting around what you think about it And allowing others to answer it for you You get out of ever having to voice your opinion If someone ever held you to your posts you would be able to say "I was just asking a question that's not my point of view" Questions are always nice but you just seem suspicious to me. What would really be nice if instead of asking "don't you think x is scummy" You would just say"x is scummy for these reasons" | ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
On July 07 2012 05:57 marvellosity wrote: Previous to this post there was some blablabla posts. Reasonably to be expected at the start of day 1. But this post... ah, I don't know where to begin with how it wiffle waffles (big sister of wishy washy). He spends quite a long time talking about prplhz, but to what conclusion? He's confusing. The first sentence is a real cracker: "I would be ok to vote prplhz" - excellent! "but I'm not totally convinced he's scum" - oh... why you ok to vote him :< "then again it would help to just go ahead and lynch one person to get us started" - what??... that's not why we lynch people. So he's happy to vote prplhz just because... he's ok with getting anyone lynched to start the game. He then proceeds to call prplhz going "lol u scum" a "good way of scumhunting." Really? :/ I mean, really?? :/ Tacked on the end of the post is the little bit about Sinensis. It feels like he's just put that there to, ya know, say something else. "like others have said, his posts sound suspicious". Well, Zentor said he sounded cautious. Dangeresque does NOT provide his own opinion here, he's just casting the doubt of others on to Sinensis. Overall just a post of such astonishing nothingness. Very scummy. First off. Don't take what I said out of context. 1. In my first post I clearly stated my position on prplhz. Scummy but not confirmed mafia. By the way scum hunting is the exact reason why we lynch people. 2. Call me crazy but it looks like him going "Marv you scum lol" worked. He got you to respond. I'm not saying he's town but it's a good way to see how people respond Don't say that all I posted was nothingness. Read it then tell me what I was saying. I was posting my views on two people. How is saying "sinesis post sound suspicious" saying nothing? I am clearly saying that I think he is a little bit suspicious Overal my opinion is as follows. Very scummy- no one at the moment for me Scummy- prplhz and marvellosity Prplhz for previous reasons Marv for the way that he just accuses Only people who accuses him and of how he explodes in his posts Kinda suspicious- sinesis How's that for " posting my opinion" | ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
Now that you bring it up it would make sense for Marv and prplhz to be on the scum team. They both throw a little suspicion at eachother without any real arguments. If I Had to gues right now I would say Marv and prplhz are scum team. This is me making a clear opinion. | ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
sorry for seeming wishy washy in my previous posts as some people have called me. i didnt think that i had enough information on people to really commit to calling someone mafia also someone said that i was defending prplhz. when did i defend him? ok down to my actual point after i put marvel on my maybe scum list i found it interesting that he spent the next 5 pages trying to convince people that im scum. there is no reason to just ask people for my opinion so many different times unless you are hopping for someone to say something bad about me. On July 07 2012 08:14 marvellosity wrote: I wasn't appealing to authority, I was being condescending. But you're both right, that's not very productive. re: your answer slOosh, yea that's cool. As I FoSed him, what do people think of Dangeresque? On July 07 2012 08:23 marvellosity wrote: wiggles - dangeresque, thoughts now On July 07 2012 08:23 marvellosity wrote: as in, your thoughts on dangeresque. On July 07 2012 08:30 marvellosity wrote: Zeph - NSH. wiggles, all he said on Sinensis is that he was 'suspicious' how is this a 'good point' ? saying someone is suspicious is not a 'good point', it's not a point at all because it's completely unexplained. How do you not understand this? I've posted on Dangeresque. Do you read the thread? throwing around suspicion at the guy who is accusing you is mafia play. On July 07 2012 08:45 marvellosity wrote: There's prplhz's behaviour, the cases made on him and the discussions surrounding it there's mszontar's bizarre attack on me there's sinensis' lurking / absence there's slOosh's ninja vote/explanation/views on anything there's dangeresque being weird there's you posting a lot BUT SAYING NOTHING there's plenty going on bro. i love how you just accuse people like this. you call me out for saying that someone is suspicious without giving much of a reason(i agrea with you however. i did not give a point when i said it. but sadly that was not my intention. i was simply saying that i was going to keep my eyes on that guy. not that he is mafia) and then you post this. accusation dont help anyone if you dont give your reasons as to why it is scummy. "dangeresque being wierd" does not help any one | ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
##Vote: Sinensis Like Ve said this is by far the best case at the moment He contradicts himself. He's overly defensive and he doesn't have any meaningful cases. Basically he only seems to cause havoc | ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
I could defenantly see prplhz being mafia. I'd like to see him post some more before I commit though Hers had quite a bit of pressure on him sense day one and his only response to the attacks was " I don't know how you want me to defend myself". He claims that he's had like 100 games. Seems like someone with that much experience should have a better answere He's defenantly on my mafia watch list | ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
He does really seem to only try and delay scumm hunting Why do you guys think the case on him is stronger than sinensis or vice versa? | ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
##Vote:drwiggl3s Your right his play does seem uncontrasted to his lvl After ive thought about it Wiggles is being more destructive than sinensis. If I'm right we need two more to vote on drwiggles for the lynch | ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
| ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
| ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
| ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
On July 08 2012 13:14 Sinensis wrote: No, I don't think so. I think if NSH wanted as easy mislynch, like you probably did, he would have just voted me... like you did. So your implying that me and NSH are part of a scum team? We would have to be a really horrible scum team If we were scum and wanted an "easy misslynch" why would we switch? You already had 4 votes And scum wouldn't have changed their vote to someone who they knew was town | ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
On July 09 2012 00:45 Zephirdd wrote: His and D77's votes were right next to each other. VE show no reasoning on wiggl3s vote. D77, use this moment to reply to what I said over there. Zeph you mean you're case on Ve or what you said about me? Whatever I'll do both 1. On one hand Marv is right. Someone does have to be in the middle On the other hand like you said he has been there for most of his votes It would be easy to pass this off as him being an unagressive player, but he was first for voting prplhz I'd like to here what prplhz thinks of him now sense earlier he was tunneling him pretty hard His recent play defenantly seems scummy. Especially because of the reasons for his votes. He never really gave any reasons. Seems like he is trying not to be able to be held to his opinion 2. Ok Im not really sure what to tell you about our votes being together I just switched from sinensis ( who has gotten a lot more aggressive and in my opinion scummy since the day ended) mostly because of what NSH was saying. At the time I had thought that sin had about the same chance as wiggles for being scum but I switched because wiggles was the person that we were actually going to be able to lynch. Id say our votes being together is nothing more than coincidence | ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
What I ment by "being more destructive" was thaf I felt as though wiggles had been delaying scum hunting more than sinensis who only really hardcore defended himself and prplhz | ||
|
Dangeresque77
United States65 Posts
On July 09 2012 06:01 MrZentor wrote: Sinensis, Marv, VE Is that really your scum team ATM??? Seems unlikely Both Marv and Ve did not bit for sinensis in the end but that's not really a strong case Please explain your reasoning | ||
| ||
