EPTTL Mafia LV
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 25 2012 04:17 strongandbig wrote: Naive and paranoid mean "always rolls innocent" and "always rolls guilty" right? yes | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
 | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I've been semi-following the thread, I'll give it a good read this evening and with any luck have something useful to post. Although I'm already doing better than my predecessor. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 30 2012 00:45 jaj22 wrote: I can't get my head around the idea of someone signing up for a game with a premeditated plan to tunnel the crap out of one player and ignore the actual game. He never even said anything in the postgame of LIV. I'll just have to file him under "strange things that townies do". On this whole issue generally. I think you really have to have been in LIV to understand the sentiments of many. BH and I weren't in the original signups for this game precisely because of LIV (yes, we both didn't sign up to this game on the original list because of how LIV played out). So I find Sinensis' actions really quite understandable. There have been plenty of people in this thread saying things along the lines of "but OMG, there's no such THING as anti-town town!". I had subscribed to that myself, but LIV shook my faith in this. And I was the scum taking advantage of it for god's sakes. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I'd have probably voted Wiggles day 1, his posting has been clear and makes sense. I don't quite get the level of flak he got for lynching Sinensis, and for a tonne of people to vote him in as mayor, then going into a lynch candidate is decidely weird. Especially don't like supersoft's accusations on the subject, as he only got vocal about the lynch after it happened. super's posting style also pisses me off. Toad we're leaving to day 2, although he can shut the hell up about being confirmed town, because it's annoying. Lurkers are annoying. Zealos is scummy. For reference, I made a meta based attack on him in Magic: + Show Spoiler + On May 26 2012 00:12 marvellosity wrote: I would like to add a bit of meta case to my argument against Zealos. Where he was scum in SNMM X he was aggressive from the get go. He was townie in LIV and although he got mod-killed early and made practically no posts, there was one post that stands out. Conciliatory. Constructive. Non-abrasive - even when he's having a go at Palmar, he's actually trying to get him to post more usefully. To the part in bold: he's not willing to make a vote there and then. He wants to think about it, and make a strong read before committing to a vote. Compare to this game. 1st post: 2nd post: Another vote: Another post: I've posted 4 quotes here. He immediately votes on VE and then immediately switches to Acrofales. He later switches to Mouldy, with an excuse for deferring his scum hunt until later. Just for emphasis, compare to his attitude as town in LIV: It doesn't add up. So it makes sense that he is well aware of how he posts at the moment after I attacked him for it very recently. It looks like he was trying to make posts at the start that look like 'townie' Zealos meta (see in the spoiler how I pointed him out as more conciliatory etc as town). However, what I didn't need to post in MTG as it wasn't my point, was that as townie he is also confident and forthright in his reads. He has done none of that. I don't mind much a wishywashy starting post, but when it's followed by more wishywashyness and no content, it starts to look scummy. I liked a lot VE's point a couple of pages ago referring to "why would you want to vig me, I'm townie". As he pointed out that is a defence that is not a defence. Currently looking like a good lynch. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 30 2012 06:00 VisceraEyes wrote: Marvel: State of the Game. Go. Read my filter: Go. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I already said I was happy to see what happens with the Toad claim thing day 2. I also made a comment on supersoft (i.e. not being vocal about sinensis before the lynch). As far as getting a read on supersoft goes, I believe he'll make his alignment clearer during day 2. He's combative but I don't see him as being good at hiding his motivations. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 30 2012 06:16 VisceraEyes wrote: Marvel, the correct response is "my thoughts are X and Y and Z"...my question of you wasn't an accusation, so there's no need to get defensive. Saying things like "I already said" and "I made a comment" are very defensive when all I wanted was your input. :/ Much like Magic you are reading my responses as defensive when they were not. I'm just baffled you are asking questions I have already stated clear opinions on or at least alluded to. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I answered it in any case. | ||
| ||
