EPT/in
need to kill EchelonTee
TL Mafia LV
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
/in need to kill EchelonTee | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
Also me kita and VE are the templar bros lol | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
Mattchew Pandian Hassybaby phagga grush57 MidnightGladius GG scum, you can resign now + Show Spoiler + I think telling the scum they can resign will be my catchphrase | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
No lol that was a gambit to see if any scum were also interested in resigning based on the assumption there was no more KP  | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
kenpachi is always town. Always | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
Lots of people I don't know in this game, I would run for mayor but there are already a lot of candidates and I'd be happy with both ET and wiggles at the moment. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
I'll wait for your case before I pass judgement but until then I won't be voting for you at all. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
On May 28 2012 06:43 Toadesstern wrote: ok done reading. I think ET is the most likely to flip mafia for these reasons: "reasons" I'd give him a decent chance to flip mafia right now but I'd like to see him posting more because I'm not sure if he's really the best case yet but I find it troublesome that people consider him a good option right now for nothing other than his "I care about noobs"-posts. Dammit toad wtf is with the contradiction? First he's "most likely to flip mafia" then he's "I'm not sure if he's really the best case yet." Here's a tip, if you're gonna analyze someone and you get halfway through and realize "oh shit he's not as scummy as I thought" then do this, save your analysis in a word doc and wait and see what happens. If you continue to get bad vibes then revisit your case, if the person cleans up their act then your second guess turned out to be right. But please don't make cases like this. This case looks to me like you're testing the waters to see who else will jump on an ET lynch. This case just screams neutrality. If ET gets lynched and flips town then no one can point fingers at you, you just link them this post and say "well he looked kinda bad but I didn't think he was the best case." This is just super wishy washy but it also looks as if you're contributing by making "cases" on people. If you're gonna go after someone, then do it with conviction, don't hide behind qualifiers. You didn't help my initial impression of you toad. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
On May 28 2012 08:15 Toadesstern wrote: You just said if I am a lyncher I am perfect for the role, not that I want it but that's what you said. You just said that if I'm a town mason that's awesome as well because I'm town. Those are the 2 options right now. Either way I'm good for the spot, the only thing that makes me bad for that thing is the fact that I don't want it lol. Do you honestly think a mafia would claim like that? Sure I could understand a lyncher but a mafia? or a SK? What do I do once people see I survived more than 1 cycle. Be all like "looool guyses, I'm modconfirmed townie but I chose not to talk to someone" ? And no I can't be RB'ed. Don't dip into wifom like that, it doesn't suit you. Also, why is being mayor so important? If you really are town you should understand why some people may be hesitant to elect you, but at the same time willing to give you pardoner since (as you correctly state), you should be able to confirm yourself by day two. We've pretty much established that pardoner is a dangerous role, dumping it off to you makes a lot of sense because we can then know for sure by day two whether you're scum or not. Your continued pursuit of the mayor role is odd. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
On May 28 2012 12:10 Sinensis wrote: EBWOP: If a mislynch is going to happen, which in all likelyhood it will because that's the nature of day 1 lynches in big games, I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles. Dat attitude... Also dat logic failure. You lynch people for acting scummy, not because they fucked you over in the last game. You threw out a huge red herring there by comparing wiggles to grush. Unless wiggles decides to claim scum, I'd bet every penny I own he won't be lynched today. Why? Because wiggles has been posting clearly, coherently, and in a protown manner. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize wiggles is a bad lynch, we're in no danger of "losing him". You're attempting to policy lynch grush (for the record policy lynches are retarded), because he's bad, not because he's scummy. Nobody wants to policy lynch wiggles, thus comparing grush to someone like wiggles is like comparing apples to oranges. If you want to bring an actual case about why grush is scum then please do, until then both you and blazinghand can drop it. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
On May 28 2012 12:47 Sinensis wrote: That middle paragraph is what it sounds like when a point flies at high speed over someone's head. I have nothing to add other than: DUH. Of course wiggles isn't getting lynched today, because his posting is good. He is an asset to town, the opposite of what grush is. And I'm not going to "drop it." That is my platform. You don't like it, don't vote for me. If I get elected mayor, grush is dying. RE: grush None of those 15 lurkers ruined my last game with poor play. Lurking has nothing to do with why I want you lynched. Right back at you bro. You missed my point entirely. Comparing wiggles to grush is a red herring, if you can't see that then I really can't help you. Also stating If I get elected mayor, grush is dying. is ridiculous. You lynch someone because they're scummy, not because you don't like them. Nobody will be voting Sinensis, thank you in advance for your compliance. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
On May 28 2012 12:57 Sinensis wrote: How about this, you find me a confirmed mafia and I will happily support their lynch instead of grush's. Hear that mafia? Go ahead and reveal yourselves now. -_-... You're being useless right now, why don't you go find some mafia. Seriously bro, if you're not actually interested in scum hunting then you're not helping the town and would thus make a decent d1 lynch. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
On May 28 2012 13:01 Sinensis wrote: I didn't compare them. Don't believe me? I'll show you: I said I would much rather lose grush, A NON-ASSET, than a valuable town asset, LIKE WIGGLES. There isn't a comparison there. Everything you have typed in the last 10 minutes has been unsubstantiated. Thanks. You just quoted the original post which had the red herring, I can't tell if you're dumb or scum. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
On May 28 2012 13:34 Sinensis wrote: Must be dumb then if those are my only two options. So what makes my post a red herring other than that I compared grush and wiggles, which I didn't do in the first place? I found this definition from online webster's, I think it should help you out: [from the practice of drawing a red herring across a trail to confuse hunting dogs] : something that distracts attention from the real issue So what issue are you confusing? Your reason for why grush should die. You call for grush's death and rationalize it by saying that It's better that grush dies than someone useful like wiggles. I called you out and said that wiggles would never die and your comparison between them is a red herring. And please read your own posts, you did compare grush to wiggles: I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles. In English, this is a comparison. It's mind boggling that you're even debating this. I agree with your self diagnosis of dumb, however that doesn't rule out the possibility of scum. | ||
| ||
