Newbie Mini Mafia XIII

On May 09 2012 20:43 Anacletus wrote:


Can't wait

On May 10 2012 23:28 Hyaach wrote:
oh i kept reading it as 24 hour day.
guess its 24 hour night/48 hour day cycle so we still got 1 full day ahead.


##Vote Anacletus

On May 10 2012 23:33 Hyaach wrote:
No edits are allowed.

IMO, i did whatever firmtofu wrote was just a innocent day 1 remark. There is nothing more suspicious about his post than yours actually.

And say "if" he was mafia, what if the mafia decided to throw him under the bus? Not a good way to rule out anything.


I'm also just voting you because there's nothing to discuss here /sarcasm

On May 10 2012 23:49 Hyaach wrote:
i meant i think whatever firmtofu wrote was just a casual remark.


you seem to know a awful lot about how the mafia plans to play their game don't you.

On May 11 2012 04:46 ShiaoPi wrote:


Is that your defense? Seriously?

BroodkingEXE if you believe me scum and starting a scumwagon, I would like to know the reasons how you came to that assumption.

On May 11 2012 05:03 Crossfire99 wrote:
Anacletus, don't think that defending yourself is scummy; it is just good play and everyone should do it. If you know you are town, then defend yourself and prove it. If you are actually town, and go down without a fight, then you have done nothing for us except die.

Also, what does scumwagon mean? I am unfamiliar with the term and don't know what it means.

On May 11 2012 04:56 ShiaoPi wrote:
The thing is you already got a lot of attention, probably the most right now.
I presented you the reasons why I am suspicious of your behaviour, what about trying to explain your thought-process? And for what kind of "evidence" are you waiting? I do not really understand the logic behind waiting for something to happen before defending yourself. The only thing which will give us any kind of evidence is a lynch, since that is still a bit away, I don't get your logic here.

On May 11 2012 05:56 Jailbreaker wrote:
if you dont have much to add, then why post?

On May 11 2012 08:28 Darkfirex5 wrote:
yeah Unforgiving i think i have to put my vote on you, ill wait a little longer before i do so, but just puting your vote on Unforgiven_ve does not seem to have any justification, you're just leaving your vote on someone with no backing/reasoning why, it seems you are trying to draw attention away from explaining yourself. You still seem the guiltiest out of everyone, maybe you should start voicing your opinon on how you are not scummy, rather than place a vote holder and do nothing productive... you're most suspicious to me. I dont know if i will be able to get on before 7 tomorrow so im voting you atm

[b\]##Vote Anacletus

On May 11 2012 09:16 BroodKingEXE wrote:
@Anacletus, What have you been doing? Has the pressure vote brought any information? Scum hunting means analyzing responses to stuff like this, I'm willing to give you the benifit of the doubt if you provide useful information.

On May 11 2012 10:16 Mufaa wrote:


Makes sense, but FYI you didn't actually vote for unforgiven. Instead of unvote you did unvite so I don't think your change will be counted. I figured after getting called out for editing you'd pay closer attention to your posts. For claiming to be pro-town these things(edit & failed voting) do nothing but benefit the mafia through ambiguity if you really are town. So why should we believe you're town if you can't take the extra 30 secs to proof your posts? Why shouldn't we assume the failed vote was you attempting to hide your focus on Tofu while ensuring that when you got called out you had a fallback ready by just saying oops?

On May 11 2012 08:08 BioSC wrote:
Fair enough. I would probably be more suspicious of you if you weren't of me. I wanted to address this because I felt it trivial to discuss when there was more obvious things to consider and talk about.

On May 11 2012 11:45 dahdum wrote:
Here are my reads and yes I know this is partially a rehash of events.


--Scummy List - --
Most To Least

Analectus - No point summarizing so far, chief suspect. Actually votes for himself after attempting to throw his vote away without reason, and says "I never said I was protown". Not acting like town.

Hyaach - Bandwagons, no pressure at all. Urges caution. Scummy.

BioSC - Highly defensive, focuses on Analectus.

Darkfirex5 - Keeps cautioning against bandwagons and voting too early, sounds like scum trying to defend Analectus. Last post says he's voting against Unforgiven but then botches the vote for Analectus?

Crossfire99 - Obsessed with Analectus, doesn't discuss anyone else.

BKE - Not providing reads, only a semi-baseless vote which helped get the game going. Talks about scum will do and urges caution. Scummy.

Jailbreaker - Worried about people pressuring too much, defensive, not contributing reads, promises something soon.


Mufaa - Very few posts but cites RL reason and reiterates basic strategy. Jumps on Analectus for technicality, contributes no reads on anyone else.

Austinmcc - Rightly pressures Analectus for his "i don't have much to add" vote, continues to lay one the pressure but never calls him out as scum or gives any real reads/analysis.


FirmTofu - Defends the bandwagon well, placing reasonable pressure on Analectus. Compared to last game he seems more thoughtful however, so I'm suspicious of that.


ShiaoPi - Jumps on Hyaach, lots of analysis. The huge post is somewhat indicative of a scum play, but I concur with his picks (Analectus/Hyaach) so far.

On May 11 2012 04:05 BroodKingEXE wrote:
@Hyaach Why did you put your vote on Ancletus? You had just as much reasoning as him. That is none.

On May 11 2012 16:08 BroodKingEXE wrote:
Whatever Anacletus is trying to do it isn't town. His response to me is that he doesn't have any information, then he throws a vote at BioSC. Pretty cut and dry.

##Vote Anacletus