Bastard Mafia

On April 09 2012 08:23 layabout wrote:
/confirm
please vig bluelightz

On April 10 2012 20:28 Drazerk wrote:
Assuming the game is balanced is a really really bad idea

On April 10 2012 21:24 Jackal58 wrote:
Has this game started?
I mean like officially.

On April 11 2012 00:38 GreYMisT wrote:
The day ends today, and so far we have 3 votes on 3 different people. I believe my vote makes the most sense at the moment given the information we have assuming nothing.

On April 10 2012 22:24 Sbrubbles wrote:


How about repeating the joke about killing you twice after the PMs were sent out then later claiming his job is to do the opposite? Sounds like he just made it up, based on his "kill bluelightz" shenanigans, just to add it to his massclaim argument.

On April 11 2012 00:29 Macheji wrote:
Ok i'll just say that layabout had made atleast 3 posts about killing bluelightz ( one of the reasons was "for the lols" ). Now he claims he needs him alive.... i mean , a mistake is a mistake, but making 3 posts about killing him and giving 4+ reasons ( all unrelated to this game ) for this and then turning 180' is weird. He also wanted to kill shrubbles.
I would propose that if we are to lynch somebody, until this moment, he seems like the best choice. But i am keeping an open mind until the time to vote does come.

On April 11 2012 00:55 GreYMisT wrote:
Sop you condemn Macheji for "sheeping other people's reasons about layabout" and yet you list only other peoples reasons.

Interesting.

On April 11 2012 19:18 Macheji wrote:
@ Cyber_Cheese . This is the first time i play this game, just tought i have to make a defence after bluelightz "attacked" me. Maybe cuz of excitement, to talk , interact or something. But the first one was really legit, right after he accused me. The second one was because i used some arguments somebody else used before me ( so that my new added details can be understood easier ) and i felt like bluelightz will have another go at me. I just wanted to make my intentions clear. If argumenting my posts and actions when someone accuses me on various reasons is "suspect", and "incriminating" then i don't really know how to act in such a situation . Hmm, it's weird cuz i'm defending myself right now, tought proving innocence would be easier ... between a rock and a hard place huh...

On April 11 2012 05:40 Macheji wrote:
Oh and before bluelightz starts accusing me of sheeping or whatever it's called again. I know i used Drazerk's point. I added some details so other people don't have to start checking all the forums for the times. I also said it to show you guys what determined me to cast my vote and to reply to layabout's

On April 11 2012 20:49 VisceraEyes wrote:
Yeah, I'm good with a Cyber_Cheese lynch. Playing the newbie card is one thing, but not as a sole basis for a lynch. I think Macheji responded fine to C_C's accusation, and the fact that C_C is still pushing it is coming off as scummy to me.

##Vote: Cyber_Cheese

On April 10 2012 14:48 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
Hey, strongandbig, why are you obsessed with the sleeper cell agents?
Furthermore, why would you try using code, when you have the anonymous message at your disposal?