EPTNormal Mini Mafia I
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
 | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
@prplz how do you suggest we get people to talk? D1 discussion is always a lulz fest; having something to go on is better than nothing. Like BC's mason plan in TL Mafia L. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
On February 02 2012 13:40 Nisani201 wrote: Well this setup is pretty basic, all of the roles are roles that we've played with before. The mason thing in L was a big topic because that kind of role isn't very common (to my knowledge). My point isn't about role discussion; it's that even if talking about a plan can muddle up the thread somewhat (read: town palmar lynched), it ultimately forces people to take hardline stances and what not. People are starting to talk now so whatevs | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
On February 02 2012 14:31 Vilonis wrote: One thing is clear, we must force the traitors among us to speak! This is good. Need people to talk to get reads. On February 02 2012 13:52 Timeaisis wrote: Agreed. But if someone remains silent for too long we may have no choice but to choose them. This is bad. If someone just hasn't said anything, then they're on chopping black to get modkilled. If someone does something suspicious then sort of drifts off with weak defense, THAT is something to look at, but you don't just lynch inactives. They are rarely mafia. unless it's a huge game. AKA lynch all lurkers is bad | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
mobile phone postinggg | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
FoS: Timeaisis see? like that! | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
On February 03 2012 08:22 Vilonis wrote: [/green]What is FoS: Player ] http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Finger_of_Suspicion It's not an official thing, but carries more weight than empty words. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
On February 03 2012 08:22 Vilonis wrote: What is FoS: Player http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Finger_of_Suspicion It's not an official thing, but carries more weight than empty words. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
On February 03 2012 02:28 Timeaisis wrote: Yeah, that may be true. Those who start the bandwagon are seeming a little more scummy to me right now. Bluelightz voted for Sinensis but unvoted before people started pointing fingers (except for him). That leaves prplhz who pretty much started the "lynch Sinensis" thing. So right now I'm leaning between voting for prplhz or Sinensis, because they both seem a little suspicious. On another note, Sinensis has 4 votes (if I counted correctly), I mean unless people retract in the next couple posts. Still not voting yet, though... So you think Sinensis is supicious for... you don't mention why actually, alright whatever. But you are suspicious of prplhz for starting a motion against someone you find supicious? Should you not be supportive of this move? As far as I'm concernced, prplhz and Sinensis are on opposite sides, at least ideologically if not red/green. Don't see how you can be suspicous of both when you posted this. On February 03 2012 03:31 Timeaisis wrote: Well prphlz and you are tied for most suspicious in my mind. Just saying. Ok, you still are against them, ok consistency at least- On February 03 2012 06:20 Timeaisis wrote: Right now, Sentinel and prphlz are my two. Especially since Sentinel seems to be more active of late, mderg's recent post, and Sinensis' recent find on prplhz (which I think is pretty reasonable). But since we have a vote rolling for Sentinel, that's the way I'm going. ##Vote: [UoN]Sentinel Wait what da faq? 3 hours later you're on sentinel. But why? Oh right, there's a vote rolling on sentinel, that's your "reasoning". You realize, this is commonly known as bandwagoning. Care to consolidate your opinions? | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
On February 03 2012 09:43 Timeaisis wrote: I'm simply trying to move this along, because both prplhz and Sentinel have seemed hositle and or scummy in the past 3-4 posts. prplhz hasn't posted since his attack on sinensis. how is he being hostile and or scummy? On February 03 2012 09:43 Timeaisis wrote: And you're defense of Sentinel is starting to make you look like you know something the rest of us don't... Wtf? I'm pointing out your flippity floppity, not defending sentinel. idgaf about sentinel; however you're sowing chaos in thread. Your tone in this sentence: you're putting on airs as if you're exposing something underhanded I am doing, when in reality, you're just trying to discredit me with nothing. I was thinking that you were just newbie townie, your filter is full of stuff like this: On February 02 2012 13:17 Timeaisis wrote: I haven't played any games myself, but I've read a couple of threads and understand more or less how it works. Of course, that doesn't mean I'm any good.  Talking about being new over and over is a weak scum tell; giving yourself an excuse for bad reasoning/lack of actual analysis is scummy, but new players are often just that: new. But to emphasize your noobiness then start advancing bandwagons while having a curious lack of logic or initiative? you're newbie scum. ##Vote Timeaisis | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
On February 03 2012 11:55 Timeaisis wrote: I didn't realize saying it once was "over and over", but OK. Whatever you say. On February 02 2012 12:57 Timeaisis wrote: Hey everyone, I'm new at this so don't go too hard on me, but I think I'll reserve my vote until we get a clear understanding of who is in our midst. . directly stating On February 02 2012 13:17 Timeaisis wrote: I haven't played any games myself, but I've read a couple of threads and understand more or less how it works. Of course, that doesn't mean I'm any good. restating badness On February 02 2012 14:42 Timeaisis wrote: OK, good to know. So basically, if someone speaks once and then is silent, that's a sign. But sounds like inactives are gonna get killed anyway. Good to know. this is a tone thing; emphasizing your lack of knowledge you could, you know, respond to every part of my posts. | ||
| ||
