EPTHammer Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
And just so we are clear The best thing in death is To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of NOOOBS! | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On January 20 2012 00:55 Hesmyrr wrote: ARGHH I wanted to get one mini-game in before mid terms start but it's no flip T_T Whats wrong with no flip more challenge :D | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Ok i got Node to join now you guys have to find other people to join | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On January 20 2012 13:08 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: He dropped out earlier, read his filter He went /in then /out then back /in again we need One more | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On January 24 2012 10:09 Mattchew wrote: Probably an isolated incidence with the voting system of this game Oh yea thats a good point. I wonder if you dont see the points then its completely possible that the lynch with out the majority of people could win the lynch that would be kinda comical tbh | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On January 25 2012 08:40 VisceraEyes wrote: >amused berating of puerile shenanigans here< Good Grief | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On January 26 2012 12:24 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: Alright, let's keep it simple and trade one vote each night to the person below us on the list, and last person gives one VP to the top person? That way we all stay at 3 and everything's fair. Yea this makes a lot of sense. This way we know where the voting power is at. And we also can ensure that we dont have a mafia loading all there votes on one person. To sway a lynch. I dont see any reasons against. (Withholding of course later in the game when we are positive someones mafia then dont trade to that guy.) Does anyone have any objections to this plan? I'm all for it. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On January 26 2012 18:28 prplhz wrote: Everybody should give away as many votes as they can every day. This is a good idea because it will prevent scum from eliminating voting power through night kills, and voting power will only get eliminated through the lynch which is more likely to hit scum than night kills. I think this is a bad idea. Trading away votes like that makes it so that the scum can easily manipulate the vote and when one of there teammates can swing the lynch by putting a crap ton of there votes on a one guy. Think about it this way if all the mafia put there votes on one person then we can have about eight votes on one guy. If they all pool there votes and then that's not including any townies that might happen to put there votes on the mafia votebag. This one person has huge potential to sway the lynch and ensure that the mafia can lead the lynch to a townie with out all piling there votes and revealing themselves. The Sentinal Method gives us the ability to have each townie be accountable for his votes. Also importantly for us to know the power behind each vote. And to make sure to give us no surprises. If we are allowed to trade haphazardly then the scum can use there vote bag to hammer the vote if we get close to lynching a townie. @Palmar Putting everyone's votes on you is a terrible idea. I'm not even sure why you are mentioning it. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Saying that four people trading together will be obvious is not so true imo. We cant even tell who they are trading to if they lie about it. I like town circles most because we have the control If they choice to kill a player so that the mafia would come out with an extra vote. Then we ofc should scrutinize that player. And it would be down rigth foolish for mafia to do the same thing a second time. They gain a single vote or maybe two votes for what possible reveling half there scum team. I dont think the mafia are that dumb. However. If we dont go with the vote circles. Then i believe that we should announce who we are giving our vote too. It helps gives us transparency and the ability to caught scum in scummy behavior or even lies. The vote circle seems like a good idea tho. Palmar if you think the the person above you or below is town will you be part of our town circle  | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
So that leaves us with the Pick your Vote and justify it the next day plan. Thats fine. I do see some of Palmar's points more choices mafia have to make. I still think that the mafia might have a really good scum player who may appear town. But that just a risk we are going to have to take. Also i would prefer to give 1 vote rather then 2 just because there's less risk involved but giving away what number of votes is up to the players discretion. About who to lynch yet im honestly not sure yet I dont support the Sentinel lynch tho. I think his first plan of circle trading was fine and pro town. Gonna go read thru some filters | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
im voting for WBG because i do think he would go for the Free Trade Voting plan. It makes the most sense. The more opportunities mafia has to mess up the more likely we can get one to mess up. I know WBG is a smart player and i do like prplhz argument against him. It makes alot of sense. I know WBG is smart and he should be smart enough to see the better plan. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
| ||
