EPTResponsibility Mafia!
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
| ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
Palmar is Hitler. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
Policy lynch on Chezinu is dumb idea. He grows on you. Give it time to get used to him. Just woke up. I'll catch up if there's anything to catch up too at work. Player list reminds me of my first game here! | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 20 2011 21:39 GMarshal wrote: quote fail. Lets try again A hydra is an account shared by two players, in this case SamuelLJackson shared by Curu and Sandroba. They are, of course the ideal target for a day one lynch! As they have the issue of being extremely difficult to read, because of the two heads. ##Vote: SamuelLJackson Also, as much as I love Chezinu, is anyone up for either policy lynching him or teaching me how the hell you get a grasp on his alignment? I enjoy his insanity, but its hardly conducive to figuring out his alignment. Just pretend you're reading Dr. Seuss on acid when you read Chez's posts. They won't make anymore sense but they become much more entertaining. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
| ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 20 2011 23:30 Chezinu wrote: Just note: mafia knows how the blue roles are triggered. So I'm guessing half will trigger them on purpose to act normal and the other half play avoidance. This game should get very interesting... muahahaha How do you get that ^ out of this? v On December 20 2011 05:58 Ver wrote: -Mafia will be given a list or some or all of the blue roles in the game but not told how many of each exist in the game. Explain please. Do you possess information the rest of us don't have access too? | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 20 2011 23:57 kitaman27 wrote: The traitor will obviously be trying to alert the mafia to his presence so if we cut down the flavor, its a lot less likely they will be able to slip in a post about the Eggs Benedict they were eating during the Hey Arnold! marathon. Plus it means GMarshal can't hide his fraudulent arguments in a wall of nonsense  Also, ##Vote Liquid`Sheth Or the Mafia are alerting the traitor to them. Could go either way. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 21 2011 05:32 Palmar wrote: rofl wiggles rolled scum again. I'm not alone in seeing that? It's his day 1 post in Eldritch Horror. Only with different names. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
His game filter. It's Cosmic Horror Mafia, not Eldritch Horror. My bad on the name. That's twice in the last day I've got it wrong. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
Cya later. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 21 2011 12:33 LSB wrote: I'm against the Foolishness lynch simply because it's a bad idea to lynch a vet day 1. Typically vets are the ones shot first, so there is a high probability that even if we don't lynch a vet, the vet still won't live to see day 2. What?????? Everybody in this game has been playing here for a minimum of 6 months. Easily. And you're using this as a reason for anything???? Your reasoning is worse than VE's reasons for not lynching Annul in XXXVIII. And those were horrid. ##VOTE: LSB | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
| ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 22 2011 01:44 Palmar wrote: @Chaoser: If I need to say something that fits into one line I'm going to keep posting that. @Jackal58: In theory this town is less dumb than the average TL town... although I'm starting to doubt that now. I'm trying to get GM lynched. How do you like that idea? GM and Mr. Wiggles both give me the willies. LSB does to an extent as well. But LSB is due to his foolish assertion that Foolishness is too good to be lynched. We used that exact same premise to save Annul on day 1 of 48. I can't point to any one thing that GMarshall or Mr.Wiggles have posted that I can point to and say aha. But they both bother me. I supose it's for much the same reason you are bothering me. They both seem to lack that townie drive I see both of them lay with. Oh and GGQ is scummy too. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 22 2011 04:54 Foolishness wrote: He already thought you were suspicious since the start, you can read the rest of his post for the full story, I just took out the relevant parts. What do you think of Palmar Foolishness? You seem to be quite willing to comment on others reasoning to this point while providing none of your own. If you had to vote this very moment who would you vote for and why? Actually you've said damn little this game so far. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 22 2011 05:11 Foolishness wrote: no + Show Spoiler + On December 22 2011 05:04 Jackal58 wrote: What do you think of Palmar Foolishness? You seem to be quite willing to comment on others reasoning to this point while providing none of your own. If you had to vote this very moment who would you vote for and why? Actually you've said damn little this game so far. With regards to Palmar, this is the most important post he's made thus far: + Show Spoiler + On December 21 2011 18:53 Palmar wrote: Are you around for a bit syllo? I really need someone to talk to. Yes I do agree that GM would be a pretty good lynch today. I tried to get him to explain why all he had to offer was policy lynches but he hasn't posted since. I don't think we should be lynching prplhz though, he's marginally more useful than most people in this thread. Did you notice that BloodyC0bbler came into the thread and the one thing he focused on was the RNG idea, something that had been out of the discussion for a long while by then. I still believe it's a good idea if a town would roll with it from the start, but at the point his post is completely irrelevant to the discussion, to the point that this post is basically a huge pile of nothing. We know absolutely nothing about BC from that one post. In addition I've had a problem with L's posting since the very beginning, I don't know if this was how you posted back when he was playing but in today's environment that's almost enough to just lynch him by default. And finally, what do you think about WBG's case on LSB? Do you agree with me that it felt a bit forced, especially the part where he basically flat out accused LSB of being a SK? There's no way any mafia would make a post like that. So are you defending L or Palmar? You say Palmar can't be mafia yet you can justify L's vote on him. I'm confused. I've never played with L before that I can recall but I did play as L in personality mafia. He apparently has issues with Bill Murray. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 22 2011 05:55 wherebugsgo wrote: Jackal, can you explain what makes you suspicious of LSB? Simple. His reason for not wanting to lynch somebody is ludicrous. Particularly in this game. The person he chose as a bad lynch target was Foolishness. Simply because he's a vet. I'm pretty sure I saw Annul receive the same defense day 1 in 48. Ya I know I did. I did it. He has also completely ignored my comment and my vote. You know what? I do the same thing when I'm scum and a single person fos's me or votes me. I ignore it. Why draw attention to it if everybody is ignoring it? I think LSB is scum. He tries to deflect a lynch target with bs reasoning. I think the target he was deflecting from - Foolishness is also scum. Foolishness is not a person that gimps through day one as a townie. GGQ is another that has 1 real post in the game. He stated in that post that he's ok with a the case on Chezinu and would support his lynch. Except there is no case on Chez. Just some early policy lynch talk but he has no votes. Then GGQ says he would support an LSB lynch but the case is really weak but hey I'll kill him anyways but it's a bad idea. Palmar and L are either both townies or both scum. I know Palmar loves to have pissing contests with his scum buddies on day 1. I've been the other half of that duo with him before. And their argument is so fucking inane it's well within the realm of possibility they are both scum. I'm undecided on both as yet. But I'll wager whatever the one flips the other will as well. So ya right now I'd be cool with everybody consolidating their votes on LSB. He should be the first domino to fall for team red. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 22 2011 06:03 SamuelLJackson wrote: Jackal's posts are giving me the exact same careful scum feeling they did in that infamous annul Jack game. Jackal where are you? /Curu I'm here Curu. And no I'm not defending Annul. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
| ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
| ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 22 2011 06:43 wherebugsgo wrote: What about his scum meta? Click his filter. | ||
| ||
