EPT##Signup
Steamship Liquidia (TL Mafia 46)
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
##Signup | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
@DoctorHelvetica: Simply ignoring every post from WBG is a valid strategy. His reads as town are pretty much all over the place and his logic tends to be kinda weird, and he's actually really effective as a distracting scum, so you don't want to be listening to him anyway. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
I have a personal vendetta against townies who get themselves lynched day 1. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
Here's a pro-tip. We lynch all liars, always, and every fucking time. No exceptions. If someone disagrees he's probably not thinking hard enough, and should re-think before he opens his mouth to spout more bullshit. Or he's scum. Think before you talk. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On November 16 2011 01:56 chaoser wrote: Really? Cause I'm pretty sure in XLIV had tons of people fake claiming and not one of them was lynched =P And look at how that game turned out. LAL is in effect, stop discussing it, we're murdering the fuck out of any asshole with a plan that involves lying for some probably dumb-as-shit reason. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
I will write an alignment analysis on the first three players people ask me to do. Each player can only select one person for me to analyse, and I will provide a post for each subject on what I currently think of their alignment. Go! | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
I'm reading prplhz and chaoser atm | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
##Vote: Coagulation | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
##Unvote: Coagulation ##Vote: chaoser So here's my reasoning chaoser needs to be lynched. First off, we should establish that chaoser is both analytical and critical as town. His play this game starkly contrasts that idea. He is throwing accusations and votes both left and right without actually doing much to back them up. Now, this leads us to think what would make chaoser throw his votes around like this. The only sensible reason to do that as town is to apply pressure, but when you are the one being pressured it's actually not beneficial to do this, because no one is going to listen to you anyway. The optimal town play in this situation is to try as hard as you can to build reputation for people to listen to you for. However, chaoser seems not even slightly interested in raising his status in the game, feeling pretty comfortable being not listened to at all. Something only scum is interested in. On November 16 2011 09:15 chaoser wrote: 1) Deal with my posts being different. This use of "your posts are different" meta is so stupid I'd gladly post completely differently every single game to kill it. Can't tell if you're mafia or stupid >_> Also while the manner in which I post is different, the reasoning behind my posts isn't, (XXXIX) 2) How are my posts "straight up scummy?" ##Vote: Sinani206 I'm so happy I get to vote multiple people This one is particularly interesting. First off, we have to understand how sinani206 works to see if this is legit. Remember, sinani206 hasn't got the greatest track record as town or scum, but he does have his tells like everyone else. This little vote he placed on chaoser seems to be pretty genuine. Like he's not pro enough as scum to realize that doing something like that with his meta as scum is excellent play, and thus the simplest explanation is that sinani206 is town. chaoser should have understood this, yet he directly OMGUS votes sinani206, even gloating about the fact he's voting multiple people. So yes, I think chaoser would be an excellent lynch today. Also, just for future reference: On November 15 2011 22:23 chaoser wrote: We are the 99% I am also green townie <3 LAL is stupid This is chaoser soft-claiming a power-role. No reason to do it unless you're scum. If you can't understand how he's soft-claiming a power role, well... you deserve to be punched. So yeah, let's kill that guy. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
So here's the deal, he's one of the harder people to read. His scumplay is pretty underestimated because of how bad his town play can be at times. He gets away with doing stupid stuff because he does it as town too, and he's not afraid of being cocky and aggressive as scum. His post regarding LAL and policies seems genuine enough, although it was kinda stupid. LAL will be enforced no matter what. But his stance seems to be what he really believes, which is probably what you would do as town. Another thing is that while I think his scum play is good, I don't think he's ballsy enough to put his neck out to argue against an accepted town policy int he way that he's done. Notice that both he and chaoser oppose LAL, but they do it in vastly different ways. I think calling prplhz scum would be very much over the top at the moment. The post he just wrote about me manipulating people is probably the most scummy thing he has done all game, because all it does is to try to detract from my analysis, which otherwise should be pretty beneficial to town. Before that post I would be inclined to end up with something like "leaning town", but I guess he's just a pretty null read at the moment. If you held a gun to my head and asked me if he's scum or town, I'd go with town at the moment. So yeah, we're not killing prplhz. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
That's awesome ##Vote Coagulation ##Vote Drazerk | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On November 17 2011 00:10 hyshes wrote: Eventhough i did like your analysis, i'm kinda confused on why you didn't just post an analysis on people you found suspicious. Don't you care on who you are doing analysis on? Or are you trying to avoid drawing a connection between you and some other persons? btw why are you voting coagulation and drazerk? You made a case against chaoser before voting for him, but not for those two. And nobody else made a case against them. prplhz told me Drazerk is scum Coag because he's always scum and he always lurks. And yeah, that's actually the case, generally it doesn't matter whose posts you read. I am pretty sure no one in this game has gone through everyone's filters and formed an opinion. Most people are likely focusing on somewhere between 2-5 people and mostly ignoring the rest of the game. So as an experiment I allowed random townies to pick which people I should focus on, because that gives the additional benefit of me not entering the analysis biased. I think it's working out well, again I am going to re-iterate: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=12303438 chaoser is scum You all should be voting for him. + Show Spoiler + If you really want to know why I'm voting Drazerk and Coag, read through their filters. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On November 17 2011 00:32 Drazerk wrote: Love you too; ill make my own mind up about chaoser later. That's pretty damn scummy, anyone with half a brain should understand that I have proven without a doubt that chaoser is at least lying, and probably scum. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On November 17 2011 00:39 Drazerk wrote: don't worry I have an Ace plan up my sleeves You keep piling on reasons why you should be lynched. And if that is a softclaim, I'm punching you in the stomach. | ||
| ||
