EPTTeam Melee Mini Mafia - Couples Therapy
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 02 2011 23:05 GMarshal wrote: We will be team asdji2342!8ladfgsdafuipgkhasfhas324ioasdjsfa*uias!dsd464fuidsfuios*d--dsasdhkfasoifh3465jeru!p2osdfashjkghdjkasd2432ghasdiourgra*siaop44sd!fsdha949-?*, pronounced "john" (I joke, I joke, we still need to come up with a name) oh what? i wanted that teamname!!! - just wanted to wait for greys agree on that :-[ | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
S&G Consulting GbR looks quite prefessional. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
definition: two or more people who want to achieve one or more goals and agree on doing that together form a GbR. translation would be company constituded under civil law in fact, grey and i are a gbr :D | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
)=:/ | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
if you're town, save all your conversations with your teampartner. if you're getting lynched, these conversations may provide something that speaks in favor of you. I know scum will do that, too now... BUT it's a lot of work to fake logs. and why should we be gentle with these guys?! | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 03 2011 12:00 chaoser wrote: I really hope you're kidding about this. I'm 100% serious about my point. Are we really going to try to exploit every single mechanic in place in a game to try to avoid the actual point of a mafia game which is to analyze and use scum hunting skills? Not to mention this doesn't even work. Look at Kita escaping lynch for a hilarious amount of days because of his "PM convo" with Radfield. It took me two days of setup to finally convince people that he was mafia and should be voted for. yes okay i agree. my "plan" is a bit lame. it's a process that uses the game mechanics in an unfair way. but i guess, posting the logs to avoid a lynch will happen anyway, unless it's forbidden. no further discussion needed. (do the extra work, scummers!) okay next point is GM accusing team Viking. Prplhz is from denmark and hes no anglistic expert. i dont mind some minor mistakes and i do them, too. i know you say he's doing that interpunctuation mistakes on purpose, and you say that a townie has no reason to be hard to understand. i think however, that scum has no reason to be hard to understand, too. therefor... @wbg: who is the scummiest team in your eyes right now? | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 03 2011 19:11 prplhz wrote: About the new rule: this is pretty cool but chaoser still has to answer for why he didn't want additional content put into the thread back when it was allowed. More content equals more material for analysis, it's not like more content equals autoconfirm. to be fair i dont think chaoser is lazy scum who doesnt want to fake logs. i think he wants to play mafia by analyzing and discussing instead of abusing the mechanics of an online mafiagame. he made that pretty clear. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 03 2011 23:04 GMarshal wrote: Which means no one ever kills him. What was the last game you remember where he was lynched, despite spouting nonesense? Same theory behind muddling your speech pasterns, it makes people less likely to pay attention to you, that way you trade pull for survivability . If you can't understand why that is beneficial to mafia then I can't help you. As I said, town strives for clarity and transparency. Scum do the opposite. yes okay. you're right in general. i was more focussed on this individial case with prplhz and i didnt get the feeling that he did that on purpose. that doesnt mean i think he's protown in general. i am going to filter our viking team now and after that i'll reread chaosers partner hyshes. i wann compare his play in this game to his play in snmm. lets what we can get. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
team kitaredff your vote is still on gm right? you still keep that vote on him? | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
as townie in xlv he confused me, as scum in pypi he annoyed me - now i know him so i wouldnt be confused but pleased if he'd annoy the scummers. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
@wbg yoep i just wanted to make sure you post something. i never judge good players based on their previous games. this works for sinani who always lurks/afk but not for the majority of the players in this game. and here we are dear @prplhz: your analysis of me is ridiculous poorly thrown together. first of all, ofc i do agree with some people. thats completely normal. scum does that and town does it, too. i am not trying to make friends. i did that in a PM game and i talked off topic things with these people. i also tried to mirror my townplay as best as i could so this meta argument is completely useless. your assumption that i didnt read the thread is absolutely baseless. Bad logic, bad arguments to discredit me wont help you. you contributed nothing except a whole lot of empty text. @nolynch discussion: USELESS right now. If we're going to lynch a dude that suddently appears to be extremely green we may come back to that. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 04 2011 07:15 kitaman27 wrote: I'd like to hear from Katzeleute and Crofty in particular about who they find suspicious at the moment. oh yeah especially katzeleute. i am not convinced at all that chaoser is scum. i know it's wifom but i kind of liked his reaction to my plan to abuse the game mechanics. my impression is, that it was an honest reaction. idk if the scumchaoser would have attacked this plan like this... we'll see... | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
he's a traditional lurker. Completely useless if town. every game the same "playstyle". | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 04 2011 07:48 iGrok wrote: Reason 1 Reason 2 + Show Spoiler + Lol. For Sandroba, particularly posts # 4, 6, and 12. hmmm all we get out of this no lynch discussion is wifom thats the problem. however sandro is very passive in general. he doesnt attack anyone except chaoser who's already under wbgs fire... meh | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 04 2011 08:01 hyshes wrote: I don't see how referring to another game says something? huh? @iGrok: well you're right about sandro. Grey wants to vote him. i kind of agree with that. this behaviour of not attacking anyone and talking about general strategies is indeed pretty scummy. on the other hand you suddenly appeared and magically found a good lynchtarget. i want to see sandros response! | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
Same thing with GM... | ||
| ||
